Trump sues Steele over discredited dossier’s ‘shocking’ claims.

Trump Sues Ex-Spy Over Discredited Dossier

Former President Donald Trump is taking legal⁤ action against British ex-spy Christopher Steele over the infamous ‍Steele Dossier, which aimed to portray collusion between Trump and Russia.

The lawsuit, filed by Trump’s lawyers, accuses ⁢Orbis Business Intelligence, the consulting group founded by Steele, of violating British data protection laws.

In a written statement, Trump emphasized that none of the allegations in the Steele reporting were ever verified.

Funds from Hillary Clinton’s ‌failed 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee contributed to Steele’s dossier, which later turned out to be discredited.

According to Trump, the dossier contained “numerous false, ​phony or​ made-up allegations,” including outrageous ‌claims of “sex parties” in St. Petersburg, and Russia did not possess any compromising material to blackmail him.

“The only‌ way to fully‍ expose the inaccuracies of the personal data in the dossier is to bring these proceedings and prove, through evidence at trial, that‍ the data is false,” stated Trump, the leading contender for the GOP presidential nomination.

The dossier alleged a “well-developed conspiracy of cooperation” between ⁢Trump’s⁤ campaign and Russia, a ‍claim that was not supported by special counsel ​Robert Mueller’s investigation into collusion.

Trump’s lawyer, Hugh ​Tomlinson, asserted ​that the former president suffered personal and reputational harm due to the ​dossier’s‌ “shocking ‌and scandalous claims.”

Antony White, a lawyer for Orbis, argued that the case should be dismissed due to the passage of time and BuzzFeed News’ ‌unauthorized publication of the dossier.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE ⁢DAILY WIRE APP

White claimed that Trump​ has ⁤a history of filing baseless and vexatious claims to harass his perceived enemies and​ those he holds grudges against.

Previously, Trump ​attempted to sue former top FBI officials and Clinton over the dossier,⁣ but his lawsuit was rejected by a⁢ federal judge.

According to a report from special counsel Robert Durham, the FBI ‌ offered to pay Steele up to $1 million for evidence linking Trump to Russia, even​ after the primary subsource failed to provide evidence for any ‍of‌ his⁢ claims.

How does Trump argue that‌ the dossier was politically‌ motivated and intended to damage his ⁤reputation and presidency?

Proof of the alleged compromising information it supposedly had‍ on Trump.

Trump’s legal team argues that ‌Steele’s actions constituted a breach of British data protection laws, as the ​dossier contained unverified personal⁤ and ⁤private information about Trump. They claim that Orbis Business Intelligence‍ should be‍ held accountable for the⁤ dissemination of false and defamatory information.

Trump also claims that the ⁢dossier was politically motivated, aiming to damage his reputation and undermine his presidency. The lawsuit states that Steele’s intent ‌was to aid Hillary Clinton’s ‌campaign by spreading false allegations of collusion with Russia.

The Steele Dossier gained significant media ​attention during Trump’s presidency and was used as a basis‍ for investigations‍ into Russian ⁤interference in the 2016 election. However, subsequent investigations, including those led by special counsel Robert Mueller, found no evidence of collusion between​ Trump and Russia.

Trump’s​ lawsuit is seeking compensation for the damage caused by the dissemination⁤ of false information and defamation of ⁤character. This⁤ legal action is seen by some as ‌a way for Trump to fight back‍ against the perceived ⁢bias and unfair⁣ treatment he believes he received during⁢ his time in office.

Christopher Steele has faced legal repercussions before, as a Russian entrepreneur sued him for defamation over allegations made in the ⁢dossier. The case⁣ eventually settled out of court, with Steele issuing a ⁤public apology and acknowledging that the information provided in⁢ the ‍dossier was unverified.

Trump’s lawsuit against⁢ Steele⁣ signifies a continued effort to hold those responsible for spreading false information accountable, particularly in the era ⁣of “fake news” and disinformation‌ campaigns. While it remains to be seen how⁢ the case will unfold, it highlights the ⁣ongoing debate surrounding the responsibility of individuals and ⁢organizations in the age of ‍information.

As the legal battle between Trump and Steele‌ commences, the outcome of this lawsuit may⁤ have lasting implications for similar cases in the future.⁣ It‍ will undoubtedly fuel discussions about the role ⁣of media, intelligence agencies, and ⁢political campaigns in the spread of unverified ⁣information and its potential consequences for individuals and institutions.

Regardless of the outcome, the Trump vs. Steele lawsuit serves ⁣as a reminder of the importance of accuracy and​ accountability in reporting, especially when dealing with sensitive and consequential matters that have the potential to impact individuals’‍ lives and shape public opinion.

While ​the lawsuit may not erase the controversies and divisions of the past, it does provide an‍ avenue⁤ for ​Trump to seek justice and ‍challenge the veracity of the dossier, ensuring that​ the truth prevails and⁤ that those responsible for spreading false information are held accountable.