The daily wire

Terrorists infiltrate our borders while we focus abroad.

Our Leaders’ ⁢Misplaced Priorities

The Danger of Neglecting Our Own Borders

Most of the attention, at the moment, is⁢ focused on events overseas. This is understandable, ⁢to some extent, as the current⁣ conflict in the Middle East is obviously very important and has far-reaching implications. The⁣ problem is that, first of all, our own leaders do not appear to be focusing on the right things. Namely, they ‍should be focusing on‍ doing everything they possibly ⁢can​ to avoid World‍ War III. But they seem entirely ⁤uninterested in avoiding a global⁢ conflict. If anything, they are motivated ⁣in the‍ opposite direction.⁣ Many ⁢of them seem to want a ​world war. And if they want ⁣it, they‌ will get it.

Second, as ​our gaze is directed at events⁢ thousands of​ miles⁤ away, our own country finds itself in an increasingly dire situation.​ We may soon have​ Middle​ East style⁤ chaos in this country, thanks to our own⁢ undefended, unprotected borders. In fact, I probably ⁣shouldn’t ‍use‍ the word “may.” It will happen. We ‍are inviting it. ‌And I’ll explain what⁢ I⁣ mean.

First,⁣ however,⁤ let’s go ‌back to one of the biggest lessons from 9/11, which​ is that hindsight ‍bias gets‌ people killed. Here’s how a lot of people ‍thought prior to 9/11. They figured, well, no terrorist has hijacked a U.S.‌ commercial aircraft, anywhere‌ in the world, for well over a⁤ decade. They ⁣certainly have never flown them⁣ into buildings. Therefore, ‍it’s crazy to worry about⁤ any terror group hijacking planes and flying them into buildings.

WATCH: The Matt⁣ Walsh ⁢Show

Pretty much​ everyone in aviation ​thought like that. In fact, just months before⁣ 9/11, the‌ leader of ​a major pilot safety association publicly opposed the idea of reinforced cockpit doors. He⁢ said, ‌“Even if you make a‍ vault out of‍ the door, if they ​have a‌ noose around my flight attendant’s neck, ​I’m going to​ open the ‍door.”​ The 9/11 Commission put that quote in their ​report because the pilot’s attitude reflected FAA guidance at the time, which stated that airplane crews should do whatever hijackers want, because there’s no⁢ way‍ they’d grab the⁤ controls and ⁣turn the plane into a missile.

The moment terrorists hijacked ‍four commercial airliners, and flew ⁤three of them into buildings and one of them into the ground, everyone on ‍the planet immediately‌ understood​ how​ wrong‌ the old way of thinking was. You don’t discount the risk‌ of a‍ particular type of terrorist attack ⁤by saying it hasn’t happened yet. Instead, you look ‍for vulnerabilities in⁤ the existing system of defenses we ⁣have, because ⁤obviously, the terrorists are ⁣doing the same⁣ thing. That was supposedly settled after 9/11.

But ⁤apparently‌ it’s not settled anymore, at ​least not in⁢ Washington. Last month, Republicans on the ⁣House ‌Judiciary Committee held a hearing to investigate⁤ how an operative with ties to ISIS had managed to smuggle more than a dozen migrants from Uzbekistan into the United⁢ States through the southern border. The FBI‌ still has no idea exactly ⁣how many Uzbekistanis this ISIS ⁢smuggler allowed into this country, nor ​do they have any way to ‌track them all‍ down — which isn’t surprising⁤ given that this past​ fiscal year, there were more⁣ illegal crossings at the​ border than at any other time in the history‌ of this country.

How are Democrats’ preferred “immigration experts” responding to this ​development?

Here’s‍ a clip from last month’s House Judiciary Committee hearing, in‍ which a vice president at the libertarian Cato Institute explains that Republicans are fearmongering about the border. Why? Because illegal ⁣migrants haven’t conducted any terrorist⁤ attacks​ yet.‌ Watch:

He’s using pre-9/11⁣ logic, and Democrats are nodding along. Terrorists haven’t used the wide-open southern⁤ border to conduct a large-scale terrorist attack so far. Therefore, you’re paranoid for thinking it’s‌ a⁤ possibility. That’s the idea. Pretty much every Democrat in Congress endorses that view. Which is kind of like leaving the door of your house wide open at night while‌ you go ‍to sleep ⁢based on the logic⁤ that⁢ you’ve never ⁣been the victim of a home invasion robbery before. It ⁢hasn’t happened ‍yet, and ​therefore will never happen, and therefore ⁢there’s‌ no reason ⁣to do anything to prevent it from happening.

This is how ⁢they’re responding to the news that ISIS is‍ bringing in migrants​ from Uzbekistan⁤ who are completely unvetted. That’s despite the ​fact that Uzbekistan has a long history of exporting terrorists⁢ to this country. On Halloween night in 2017, for example, a 29-year-old Uzbek migrant (here‌ on a visa and later became a legal ⁢permanent resident) drove⁣ a ⁢truck into pedestrians and cyclists in Manhattan, killing‍ eight of them and wounding many more. That attack followed the sentencing of another​ Uzbek migrant, also here on a visa, who⁣ was found ⁤guilty of terrorism charges‌ for planning to bomb ‌Coney Island.

Democrats (and libertarians, apparently) want you to ignore all of this, because those Uzbekistani ‍terrorists didn’t⁤ arrive⁢ through the southern border. They came ⁢on ‌a plane.⁤ Therefore,⁢ they’re ‌saying, ⁢you have no reason to worry about border security.

It’s a totally nonsensical ⁤approach, but that’s what they’re going with. Republicans, for the most part, want you ⁢to‍ focus on Ukraine and the Middle East. ​Mitch McConnell, who is somehow‌ still in office, says Ukraine is our top‌ priority.

As a result of​ this bipartisan consensus in Washington — this ⁤decision⁢ to focus on every other ‌border except ‌our own — there’s now a very ⁣real risk that ‌Americans will die. As CNN reported,

The episode [involving the ISIS smuggler] was so alarming that ⁤an ‍urgent ​classified intelligence report ‌was circulated to President Joe Biden’s top Cabinet officials in ‍their ⁤morning briefing book. For​ some counterterrorism officials, it shows that the US is deeply vulnerable to the possibility that ⁣terrorists could sneak across the southern border ⁣by​ hiding amid the surge ⁣of migrants entering ⁤the ⁢country in search of asylum.

To be⁢ clear, the Biden⁢ administration isn’t simply ignoring this problem, they’re facilitating it. After 9/11, the U.S. government started using a category called “Special Interest Aliens” ⁤to flag migrants coming from countries that promote terrorism, such ‍as Uzbekistan. The idea was to be transparent ‍with Americans about who exactly is coming into this country, and from where. But the Biden administration has decided to hide that data.

At the same hearing, Todd Bensman of the Center for Immigration Studies also⁤ testified. He told⁤ lawmakers that, “The⁤ Biden ‍administration has taken steps ⁤to obscure the numbers of special interest aliens from the ⁢US public, ending routine reporting of these ‘apprehensions by nationality.’” Indeed, on the Border Patrol website,⁣ they don’t list the⁤ number of special interest migrants coming from the vast majority⁣ of Muslim countries. They don’t want you to ‌know how many people‍ ISIS could be bringing to this country from places like Uzbekistan.

But many of ‍those numbers have leaked anyway. ⁣And Todd Bensman​ told ⁤the House Judiciary Committee what they show. It turns out that our southern border ‍is so⁣ overwhelmed with migrants ⁤that we’re not able ‌to effectively screen special interest aliens at all. Watch:

Those numbers don’t even seem possible. Between October 2022⁣ and August 2023 — that’s less than a⁤ year’s time — more than 75,000 special interest aliens were encountered by Border Patrol. Before the current border crisis, the number of ⁢special interest⁤ aliens encountered by Border Patrol officials⁢ was closer to 3,000. And these⁢ are just the migrants ⁢that​ were “encountered.” The actual number of special interest aliens arriving at our border is far⁤ larger.

And again, ⁢these are just‍ the people coming from countries that the U.S. government ​believes are a high risk of terrorism. We’re also importing the ⁣rest ‌of the Third ‍World, too,​ without any vetting whatsoever. Along with⁢ de-policing, ​that’s leading to drastic increases in violent crime rates in this country. We’re not taking ⁣in families or stable households. We’re taking in mostly young men with‌ no ties to this country and very little to⁢ lose. And⁣ in response, a lot ⁢more migrants are ‍coming our way.

This was the scene in Mexico recently, as yet another large group of migrants, apparently from Haiti, broke through barriers at a refugee office:

You can see the crowd for yourself. When Democrats talk about illegal immigrants, they want you to imagine mothers with ⁤young children fleeing⁢ poverty and oppression. The huddled masses yearning to breathe free, ‌they tell us.⁣ Because they‍ think a poem engraved on a large statue carries ​the weight‌ of law​ and should actually determine our immigration policy. But this does not really​ describe a great ‌number of the immigrants pouring across the ‍border. There are some mothers with young children.

But what you just saw in the video were⁤ a bunch of young, military-aged males. The sorts of‌ people​ who could be of ‌use in their own countries. They⁤ could be trying to ⁢improve their own homes, fighting to ‍make their own​ countries ⁣prosperous — or at least livable — but instead they come here. And not always with the best of intentions.

This is what happens when politicians promise⁤ free healthcare to illegal ​aliens, as⁤ every Democratic Party‌ presidential candidate⁤ did in the last election.

This is what ⁤happens ‍when the president⁣ of the United States announces his​ commitment to⁣ making America less ‍white, and decides to ‍defame any Border Patrol officer who tries⁣ to enforce the ‌law.

This is what happens ‍when we are more concerned with ⁤other country’s​ borders than our own.

And this is why people from Haiti,‍ and so many other countries, are heading for ⁤the U.S. border, which is not ‍even remotely secure.

ISIS sees this happening. Every terrorist organization⁣ on the‍ planet sees ⁢it happening. They saw the atrocities​ that Hamas was just able to commit⁣ against Israel, which has one of the⁢ most closely‌ surveilled⁢ and guarded borders⁢ on the entire ‍planet. There is no doubt that they’re looking ⁢at our ⁢open border as an opportunity to commit similar ⁢acts ​of ⁢barbarism⁤ in⁤ this country.

Courtesy ​of ISIS, ⁢there’s reason to ‍believe that many of these terrorists are already ⁤here. We can either respond by closing ‍and⁣ militarizing ​the border and beginning mass deportations, or we can prepare ourselves⁢ for the inevitable.

There ⁣will be an attack. ⁣The Left ​will⁣ pretend to re-learn the lessons of⁢ 9/11 all over again. And American​ citizens — who are⁣ the only citizens our leaders are supposed‌ to protect ‌and defend — will die as⁢ a result.

CLICK HERE TO‍ GET THE DAILY WIRE APP

How ‌has neglecting our own borders impacted the‌ security and safety of our country, beyond just the threat ⁢of‌ terrorism?

Ory of producing terrorists and has been a ‍source of ⁤concern for international security agencies. But⁤ according to Democrats, we shouldn’t worry because nothing bad has happened yet. It’s a dangerous mindset that puts our country at risk.

The​ problem with neglecting our own borders⁣ is that it leaves us vulnerable to all sorts of threats, not just⁣ terrorism. Drug smuggling, human trafficking,‍ and the​ spread of infectious⁢ diseases ‌are just a few examples. Our leaders should prioritize securing our borders ​and implementing effective immigration policies that ⁤protect the interests and safety of our citizens.

It’s not about being anti-immigrant or isolationist, ​but rather about ensuring ⁢that those who come into ⁢our country do so legally and that we have the resources and​ systems ‍in place to properly vet and screen individuals. It’s about maintaining the rule of law and national security. Ignoring these issues and ‌turning a⁢ blind eye to the ‌potential consequences is ‍a⁣ grave mistake.

Furthermore, ‌the focus⁤ on events overseas needs⁢ to be balanced⁢ with a strong focus on domestic issues. While it’s important to address global conflicts and support our allies, we cannot neglect the ‍needs ‍and concerns of ⁤our own citizens. Our leaders should be‌ prioritizing issues such as healthcare, education, ⁣infrastructure, and the ‍economy. It’s their duty to ensure the well-being and prosperity of the American ⁢people.

In conclusion, our leaders’ misplaced priorities, particularly their neglect of ‍our own borders, pose a great danger to our country. We cannot afford to be complacent or naive about the risks that exist. It’s time for our leaders ‍to shift their focus, take responsibility, and prioritize the safety ⁣and⁢ well-being of our nation. ‍Only then⁤ can we truly thrive⁣ as a country and protect​ our ‌interests‌ for generations ‍to come.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker