The epoch times

Florida’s water issues and solutions serve as a national model.

When the city of Lake ‌Mary tested its ⁤public wells in 2014, ​it made a startling discovery. The Florida community of 17,000 had ⁣elevated levels of‍ 1,4-dioxane in its water, ​a chemical that the EPA says can cause kidney and liver failure or cancer from prolonged exposure.

While reducing pumping at specific wells ‍with⁣ the highest measurements of the chemical solvent lowered levels of 1,4-dioxane going into Lake Mary homes to what is ⁢considered “safe” by both the EPA and ‌the Florida Department of Health (DOH), former public works director, Bruce Paster, was concerned for the future. What if‍ the ⁣levels of 1,4-dioxane increased again, and suddenly, ⁢residents‍ and public health officials demanded‌ a comprehensive ‍solution for the 3 million gallons‌ of drinking‌ water pumping ​into the city ⁤daily?

For Lake Mary residents, the city blamed the companies liable for the crisis. The chemical plume originated at ‌the Siemans-Stromberg hazardous waste site ⁣at 400 Rinehart ‍Road, Seminole County, which, according‌ to DOH‍ paperwork, used chlorinated solvents until the early 1980s. Over the years, three companies were ‍associated with the site—General Dynamics, MONI Holdings, and​ Siemens—all required to collectively pay for Lake Mary’s new water treatment plant.

This agreement gave Lake Mary‍ a unique opportunity, according to Public Works Director Danielle Koury.⁤ Unlike most‌ municipal ​water utilities forced to ​find the most practical solution at the lowest⁤ affordable cost, Lake Mary made a⁣ deal with the three responsible companies to‌ create the best possible water ‍treatment system that money‍ could buy. The cost was roughly $40 million, according to Ms. Koury.

Instead of‍ only using granulated activated ‌carbon (GAC) to filter its groundwater ‍contaminants—which is essentially high-grade charcoal—Lake Mary adopted an approach known as “advanced oxidation,” which completely⁤ “destroys” 1,4-dioxane by ripping the molecules to shreds, leaving no byproduct whatsoever, according⁢ to Ms. Koury.

She said the solution is ideal because “We are ⁢essentially destroying the ⁣chemical, not just removing it from the ⁤water that‍ you’re‌ drinking. ‌So, like with ⁢reverse⁢ osmosis and carbon filters,‌ the chemical is being absorbed into either a membrane or that carbon. What do you do with the ⁣membrane or the leftover? You’re removing ⁤the chemical; what do you⁢ do with the⁢ waste that is still present?

A map of Lake Mary’s⁣ water service area. (Courtesy of Lake ⁢Mary)

Advanced oxidation combines ⁣the power⁢ of strong⁣ ultraviolet lights with‌ the corrosive powers of hydrogen ​peroxide to create what’s known​ as a hydroxyl radical, a molecule with the capability of tearing apart ​certain chemicals ⁢and​ rendering⁢ them inert, such as 1,4-dioxane. The UV⁢ lights ⁤are similar ⁢to the ones ⁣used in‌ air sanitation⁤ products but much stronger. While store-bought hydrogen peroxide’s strength is‌ only 3 percent, the peroxide used by Lake Mary is 50 percent ​and nearly 17 times stronger.

According​ to NASA,‌ hydroxyl‌ radicals naturally occur in the atmosphere and act like a‍ “detergent in the air” ⁣as they ‌break down harmful gases, such as methane. One study found that hydroxyl⁣ molecules⁣ can also naturally ​degrade ‍acids,‍ alcohols, aldehydes, aromatics, amines, ethers, ketones, ‍and other chemical contaminants.

For 1,4-dioxane, public health ⁣officials nationwide ‌are ‍facing similar⁣ issues ⁢to Lake Mary. The solvent was found in⁢ shallow groundwater in Waterworks Park in Ann Arbor, Michigan, in 2016 ​after it migrated from a plume⁢ that originated at the former Gelman Sciences property. While the chemical’s levels were not‌ high enough ⁢to result in vapor exposure from‌ running water indoors, some public⁢ health officials feared ramifications of long-term exposure to the solvent.

Officials found 1,4-dioxane‍ in Pittsboro, ‌North Carolina’s drinking water in 2021. Initial tests confirmed that levels of 1,4-dioxane were​ more ⁢than double the amount considered to be safe, according ⁤to ​officials. The⁢ town⁢ stopped drawing as much water from Haw River, which had high ⁢measurements of the chemical, ​in hopes ⁤that ‍it would reduce the 1,4-dioxane​ to a safe threshold. Despite those attempts, the amount of 1,4-dioxane in the‍ town’s water was slightly higher than what the EPA deems safe.

Lake Mary’s solution to its 1,4-dioxane groundwater⁢ contamination is comprehensive and advanced and​ could potentially destroy other common chemical contaminants such ⁣as vinyl chloride, according to⁤ Ms.⁣ Koury. However, every chemical ​exposed to advanced oxidation‌ would need to be studied extensively ⁢first.‍ And that will⁤ depend on every⁤ municipality’s water source, she said.

Ms. Koury pointed⁣ out the issue of different contaminants coming ⁢from water sources that ⁤could be adjacent. Other wells could contain bromide, which ⁣turns into a⁢ highly dangerous chemical known ⁢as bromate​ when exposed to advanced oxidation.

Dr. Steven J. Duranceau, Professor of Environmental Engineering at the University of Central Florida and Director of‍ the⁤ Environmental Systems Engineering Institute, echoed these concerns. According⁣ to Dr. Duranceau, advanced oxidation⁣ not only presents issues when ⁢groundwater contains bromide but is not the ⁢only solution for removing​ 1,4-dioxane specifically.

He co-authored a paper on using a “nanofiltration⁤ membrane process” to remove the solvent from exposed groundwater, akin to a super-dense filter with ​a tiny micron count. However, ‌according to Dr. Duranceau, ‌GAC is also effective at removing 1,4-dioxane; it is ​not as comprehensive as advanced oxidation because there is waste when replacing the carbon that filters the chemical.

Dr. Steven ⁣J. ⁤Duranceau, Professor⁣ of Environmental Engineering at the ⁣University of Central Florida and​ Director‌ of the Environmental Systems Engineering Institute. (Courtesy of the University of Central Florida)

Many‍ residents ‍expressed frustrations ⁣with Lake Mary, even though Dr. Duranceau ⁣emphasizes that chemicals like 1,4-dioxane were previously unregulated by the EPA.

“If ​it was me that found out, I’d be thankful⁤ that Lake Mary went ahead above and beyond to protect their citizens​ through the ⁤public water system. You know, kudos to them for going and making an organization ​help them deal with a contamination issue that​ wasn’t ⁢even regulated,” he said.

Additionally, Lake Mary’s woes with 1,4-dioxane are just a small‌ part of Florida’s decades-long struggles‌ with⁤ groundwater contamination.

Creating Safe Drinking Water

“You’re talking about a complex natural water system that has one or more contaminants ⁣in it because of industrialization,” Dr. Duranceau said.

Sometimes,⁢ officials trace ​those contaminants to leaking gasoline tanks‌ underneath old gas stations, which can release ‌a chemical ‍known as TCE into the⁣ surrounding groundwater. While water treatment plants can remove TCE through aeration techniques, just ​one ounce of gasoline is required to contaminate millions of gallons of water, according to Dr. Duranceau.

He said ⁢that water wells in Florida also test positive​ for chemicals like ‌benzene and xylene. Some chemicals found in wells are ⁤regulated at low levels, and others are not. All regulated chemicals in drinking water are defined ⁢by the ‌Safe Drinking Water⁢ Act.

“The drinking water laws, the​ United States Environmental Protection Agency’s ‌Safe Drinking Water Act is the most complex, comprehensive legislation ever enacted by any society, in the history⁢ of the world, to protect people’s exposure ‌in ⁢a public system to an involuntary exposure to ‌contaminants in the ⁣water system,” Dr. Duranceau said.

The Safe Drinking Water Act was ⁣passed in 1974 to “protect public health by regulating the nation’s public drinking water supply,” according to‌ the EPA.‍ It‍ was amended in 1986‍ and ​1996, allowing the EPA to “set national health-based standards for drinking water ‌to protect against both naturally-occurring and man-made contaminants that may be found in water.” Federal and state governments collaborate to ensure safety regarding the‌ public’s access to drinking water.

The⁢ Environmental Protection Agency headquarters in‍ Washington, on March 23, 2023. (Richard Moore/The Epoch Times)

For ⁣many⁣ municipalities faced with chemical contaminants in their groundwater, using activated carbon (GAC) is typically enough, as long as the carbon media is replaced as⁣ needed,⁤ Dr. Duranceau said. However, he noted a past public health crisis in‍ Hawaii when countless residents bought GAC systems ⁤for their homes ⁤to rid their water of chlorine, which is an essential disinfectant⁢ in ​most public water⁤ systems.

According to Dr. Duranceau, many residents were not replacing the carbon ⁢in their GAC systems, which led⁢ to rampant bacterial growth within their home water filtration equipment. An ⁢“itchy water”⁣ outbreak resulted that residents blamed ⁢on their municipal ⁣water utility, when in fact, ‍it was the ​residents doing it to themselves, he said.

Natural disasters can complicate public water safety as well.

After the​ August 2023 fires in Maui, Hawaii, devastated public and private land—destroying ​countless homes and businesses—the heat from the flames also damaged municipal⁣ water lines. Public ⁣health officials warned residents that ‌filters were insufficient and that there was no “way ‌to make ‌ [the water] safe.” ⁢The fire⁢ caused‌ pressure loss in water ⁢lines, which let‍ toxic chemicals, metals, and bacteria seep‍ inside. Sometimes, simple breaches to the pipes⁢ can result in waste runoff mixing with public drinking water. Flames can ⁣also melt plastic liners inside ‌pipes, resulting in ‌toxic fumes ‌flowing through water lines.

These pipes can​ be a huge source of contamination, according to officials. Historically, the lines that carry ‌water from wells or water sources to treatment facilities and out to homes‍ and businesses‍ were not always constructed⁤ from materials that are now deemed “safe.” ‌Lead was used in water lines throughout the United States for‌ years, especially ⁣in industrial areas like the Northern Midwest.

National Lead ​Crisis

According to ​a study from the​ National‌ Library⁤ of Medicine, health officials recognized the link between lead pipes and lead poisoning as far back as⁢ the late 1800s. Cities and towns began restricting the use of lead pipes by the‍ 1920s. However, the lead industry, championed by the Lead Industries Association (LIA), lobbied against this pushback of lead plumbing. ⁣The ‍LIA sent representatives to “speak with plumbers’ associations, local water ⁢authorities, architects, and federal officials.”

The National Library of Medicine charged the LIA with publishing articles and books that “extolled the advantages of lead over other⁣ materials and gave practical advice on the⁤ installation and repair of lead pipes. The⁤ LIA’s activities over ​several decades, therefore, contributed to the present-day public health and economic ⁤cost ⁣of lead water pipes,” according to the study.

“Lead affects the nervous system‌ in ‍adults and children. Long-term exposure may lead to muscle weakness, kidney damage, high blood pressure, reproductive problems in‌ both men and⁤ women, and​ miscarriage,” according to a Florida Department of‍ Health fact sheet.

One of the states most​ affected by⁣ lead pipe poisoning is Michigan.‍ State officials tried to save money ​in 2013​ by redirecting the city of ⁢Flint’s water from the Detroit ⁤River⁣ to ⁤the local Flint River for the‍ city’s 100,000 residents.

Even ‌though the move was intended to be temporary until officials could connect to Lake Huron, residents almost immediately started​ complaining about the city’s water’s taste, smell, and brown color. Some experienced​ rashes and hair loss before a group of doctors measured increased lead levels in children’s blood and urged the city to stop drawing water from the Flint River.

U.S. ​Surgeon General Vivek Murthy inspects a bottle of water that contains water from ⁢Flint resident Tia Simpson’s tap at her home​ on Flint’s south side, in Mich., on Feb.​ 16, 2015. (Jake May/The Flint Journal-MLive.com via AP)

The river​ was exposed to industrial⁤ and unofficial waste disposal ⁢for ‍decades, which included ⁢treated and untreated refuse from carriage and ⁢car factories, meat ‍packaging plants, and⁤ lumber and paper mills, among others, according to the National Resource Defense Council⁣ (NRDC). ⁣Flint’s waste-treatment plant⁣ also expelled raw​ sewage into the ⁢river and ⁤toxic chemicals ​leeching from⁢ nearby landfills. There are rumors⁣ that the Flint River caught on fire twice, according to the NRDC.

Decades of chemical​ runoff‌ made the Flint River’s water highly corrosive, and the lack of proper treatment of that water before it was sent through aging lead water lines beneath Flint resulted in lead leaching into the city’s‍ drinking water, ⁣according to the NRDC.

Michigan Gov. Rick ‍Snyder announced in 2015 that the‍ state would spend $1 million to buy water filters and test the‍ water in Flint public schools. The ensuing years saw ‌Mr. Snyder distribute bottled water and filters to Flint residents while ⁤asking the Obama administration for federal aid and a major disaster declaration. While⁣ investigators⁢ unraveled the threads of ⁢blame and⁣ eventually charged several state and local officials for the‍ disaster—and then acquitted all but one⁤ official—Michigan ended bottled water distribution in 2018 after⁢ saying ⁢the city’s tap ‍water ⁤had ⁢improved.

At least 95 percent of the city’s⁤ old lead water lines ​have been replaced with modern infrastructure, according ​to a report from the University of Southern‍ California’s‍ Keck ‌School of⁣ Medicine. Additionally, the city⁣ reached six years of compliance with federal water⁤ standards in January 2022.

New water ‍pipes awaiting installation⁤ in Flint, Michigan on Feb. 19. (Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)

While Flint residents now have access to‌ clean drinking water, those living in Benton Harbor, Michigan,​ faced a similar lead crisis in 2021.⁢ The city’s ⁣water tested positive for elevated lead⁢ levels three years⁤ in a row,⁣ prompting ‌Gov. Gretchen Whitmer‍ to​ allocate⁢ millions of dollars​ to replace ⁤the city’s lead water lines within 18 months. An investigation by the EPA found issues so dire with the city’s water treatment facility that the regulatory body‌ recommended⁤ the city forfeit the plant’s ownership.

Unlike Flint, Benton Harbor draws its water from Lake Michigan, considered a clean water ‌source. But like⁢ Flint, Benton Harbor’s⁢ lead came from the pipes underneath the city, not the water source itself.

Lead Pipes in Florida?

In April, the EPA released a preliminary survey of lead​ pipes‍ nationwide to determine how to allocate billions ⁢in money from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law set aside‌ for ⁤lead pipe replacements in each state. The full survey will base allocations on the ⁤number of lead pipes ‌a state contains.

Florida ‍was at ‍the top with an estimated 1.16 million​ lead pipes. ‌States like Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania are more often associated with extensive lead pipe use. Illinois ‌was​ second⁤ on⁣ the list, followed by Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and ⁢New⁤ York.

The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) was surprised by Florida’s ranking and Texas’s⁣ measurement of ‌650,000 lead pipes. The EDF found numerous flaws with the EPA’s April survey. ‌It reached ⁤out‍ to the six Florida municipalities alleged to contain the most lead lines—Pinellas County, Jacksonville, Fort⁤ Lauderdale, Cocoa,​ Hillsborough County, and Pasco ‍County—and all but one responded with confusion over⁢ the source of the EPA’s data.

Pinellas County, Florida (Screenshot/Googlemaps)

Some utilities said they⁤ were just beginning their inventories of lead water lines ahead​ of the EPA’s October 2024 deadline,‍ while others do‌ not remember being surveyed by the EPA in the‍ first place, according to the EDF.

The environmental‍ group ​gave Florida a new estimate of 100,000 ⁤lead water lines instead of the EPA’s 1.16 million. ⁤This estimate would reduce the​ Sunshine State’s lead line infrastructure‌ allocation from $225 million to the $28⁤ million baseline, the EDF⁢ said.

The Florida‍ Department of‌ Environment Protection (FDEP) did not ​respond to requests⁤ for comment.

Brian Miller, spokesperson for FDEP, ⁤shared similar concerns with the EPA’s findings‍ in a statement to the Associated Press.

“Once these lead line surveys are completed, it is expected⁤ that the actual extent of facilities with lead service lines ‍documented in Florida will be ⁣significantly less than ​what was⁢ estimated by the EPA,” he said.

Highest Quality Water at the Lowest ⁢Affordable Cost

State‌ officials⁢ found lead in several schools’ drinking water⁤ in 2019,⁣ prompting bipartisan action from the Florida legislature. It drafted‍ a⁤ bill to put water filters in all schools built before 1986, when the state‌ started using other metals in its water lines.

Whether a community’s drinking water is‍ exposed⁢ to carcinogenic chemicals like ⁤1,4-dioxane or neurotoxic metals like lead, activated carbon filters—or GACs—are viable⁢ treatment methods,⁣ according to the EPA.

Dr. ‍Duranceau expressed a similar sentiment—unless there are other complex ⁤factors or contaminants ‍in a public ​water source, “Granular activated ⁢carbon is‍ the best ⁤available technology​ for​ those types of contaminants.”

GACs can be used in water treatment plants and bought for homes and businesses for added filtration to tap water.

Activated carbon/charcoal is used to make‍ GAC filters. ‌(Jacob Burg/The Epoch Times)

The solution‍ to water contamination is not always the most expensive and elaborate treatment setup. Sometimes,⁣ it is as simple as changing the‍ source of a‍ municipality’s drinking water, which is what Lake Mary did when it stopped drawing ⁤water from a well that‌ tested‌ positive for‍ 1,4-dioxane ⁤at levels far higher than any other⁤ wells in ‍the area,⁢ according to Ms. ⁣Koury. ⁤This move is also what Flint had ​to do after their initial⁢ change in⁢ water sourcing resulted in a ⁤national crisis.

According‌ to Dr.‌ Duranceau, every community and private water source—whether it is a well for a single⁤ home, school, or business—will require a water treatment plan that reflects ‍the specific contaminants within its​ water. There is no single solution that works across ⁣the board in every location.

“People​ don’t realize what’s involved in‍ getting⁢ water‌ from a water plant ⁢to your tap safely so you don’t die,” Dr. Duranceau ⁤said. “You want to produce the highest quality ⁤water ⁤at the lowest affordable⁤ cost.”

The‌ Associated Press contributed to this report.


" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker