The epoch times

State Dept. official quits due to hasty response on Israeli military aid.

A seasoned ⁤official at the U.S. State⁤ Department, specializing in arms transfers, has stepped down‌ from his ⁤position‍ due to his strong opposition to sending more⁤ weapons and ‌ammunition to Israel. ⁣He believes that ⁤this impulsive reaction will only result in more⁢ suffering for both Israelis and ‌Palestinians.

“I fear we are repeating the ‌same mistakes we have made these past decades, and I decline to be a part of it for longer,” expressed Josh Paul, the ‌official,⁤ in​ a LinkedIn post ​on Oct. 18, where he explained ​the reasoning behind his resignation.

Mr. Paul held a ⁢directorial role at​ the State ⁤Department’s​ Bureau⁤ of Political-Military Affairs, ⁤which serves as the primary communication channel between the​ State⁣ and Defense departments and oversees‌ the distribution of military aid ‌to foreign nations.

His decision comes in the⁣ wake of President Joe Biden’s ‍firm commitment to⁤ provide unwavering support ​to Israel’s military ⁢forces⁣ as they ​retaliate against the Hamas terrorist group in Gaza. This response ‌follows Hamas’ brutal surprise attack on Oct.‍ 7, which involved a barrage of rockets and ‍a large-scale incursion into ‍southern Israel by land, sea, and​ air.

The White House ​has⁢ stated that the U.S. support includes the deployment of two aircraft carrier strike groups to the eastern Mediterranean to⁣ “deter‍ further aggression,” as ⁤well‌ as the replenishment of Israel’s multibillion-dollar “Iron Dome” air⁢ defense system, which has successfully intercepted most​ of the rockets fired ⁣from‍ Gaza.

“Let me be clear:⁣ Hamas’ attack on Israel⁤ was not just ⁢a monstrosity; it was a monstrosity of monstrosities,” emphasized Mr. Paul, who also expressed concerns about potential escalation‌ by the Iran-backed ⁣Hezbollah terrorist⁤ group ⁤or Iran itself.

“However, I firmly believe that⁤ Israel’s response, along with the American support for that response and the status quo of the occupation, will only result in ​more profound⁢ suffering for both⁤ the‌ Israeli and Palestinian​ people—and is not in the long-term⁢ interest of the ​United ‍States.”

Mr. Paul, who has been involved in arms transfers‌ to U.S. allies for 11 years,‍ stated that the​ Biden‍ administration’s reaction to the Israel-Hamas ⁤conflict is​ entirely ‌predictable, as it ⁤aligns‍ with Washington’s approach over ⁤the past few decades.

“Decades of following the ⁤same ‌approach have​ demonstrated that ‌prioritizing ⁢security over ‌peace ⁤leads to neither security nor peace,” he wrote. ​”The truth is, unwavering support for one side is detrimental in the long run to the interests of‍ both sides.”

As of press time, State ‍Department officials have not responded to The​ Epoch Times’ request for comment.⁣

Biden ‌Reaffirms US ​Support for ‍Israel

During his speech in Tel ‍Aviv on Oct.​ 18,‌ President Biden reassured Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that the United States fully supports the Jewish state’s war efforts.

“For⁣ decades, ‍we have ensured ⁢Israel’s‍ qualitative ⁢military edge,” ⁢declared‌ the president, ⁢highlighting that ​he is the “first U.S. president to visit Israel in a ‍time of war.”

“Later ⁣this week, I will request an unprecedented support ⁢package for Israel’s defense from the ⁤United States Congress. We will continue to fully supply Iron Dome so that it can⁢ safeguard Israeli skies and save ‌Israeli lives.”

President Biden also pledged $100 ⁢million in humanitarian ⁣aid for civilians​ in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. ⁣He mentioned securing a pathway, with the support of both‍ the Israeli and Egyptian governments,‌ to​ allow the entry of food, water, and medical⁢ supplies⁢ into​ the southern part of Gaza through Egypt.

Expressing gratitude, Prime Minister Netanyahu, who⁤ has mobilized over 300,000 Israeli⁢ troops ⁣in preparation for a⁣ highly anticipated ‌ground attack on​ Gaza, thanked ⁤President‍ Biden for the “steadfast commitment” to provide Israel with the necessary⁤ tools‌ for⁢ self-defense.

“We see this​ support in the clear message you have sent to our​ enemies, warning​ them not to test our⁤ resolve, ‌and in the two American carrier battle groups that‍ you have⁣ deployed to ⁣the region to back up those words with action,” he acknowledged.

“Above all, ‌Mr. ​President, the⁣ world recognizes this support in ⁢the⁣ moral clarity you​ have demonstrated since the moment Israel was⁣ attacked,” he concluded.

⁣ How⁢ does Josh‌ Paul’s resignation contribute to the ​ongoing debate surrounding ⁤U.S. military aid to Israel?

Longtime State⁢ Department Official Resigns Over Opposition to Arms Transfers to Israel

A⁣ seasoned official at the ​U.S. State Department, specializing ⁢in arms transfers, has made the difficult decision to​ step down from his position ⁣due to his strong opposition to sending more weapons and ammunition to Israel. Josh Paul, the‌ official in question, believes that this ⁣impulsive‌ reaction will only result in more suffering​ for ‍both Israelis and Palestinians.

In a recent LinkedIn post on October​ 18, Paul expressed ⁤his concerns,‌ stating, “I fear ⁢we are repeating the same mistakes we have made these past decades, and I decline to be a part of it for longer.” He further explained the reasoning behind ​his resignation, indicating that he ​could no longer⁤ support a policy that perpetuates the ​cycle of violence and does not lead to a ⁤lasting resolution.

Previously, as a directorial‍ role at the State Department’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Paul served as a key communication channel between the State and Defense departments. This bureau oversees the ‌distribution of​ military aid to foreign⁤ nations, including Israel. However, Paul’s growing reservations⁢ about the effectiveness⁣ and ethical implications of ​these arms ⁤transfers prompted him to take a stand and prioritize the well-being of⁢ both Israelis and ‌Palestinians.

The decision to resign from a high-ranking position demonstrates Paul’s dedication to his principles⁢ and his commitment to advocating⁢ for‍ a more peaceful and sustainable approach to ‌the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. While his departure may be​ seen as a loss within the State Department, it also ⁤highlights the importance of individuals standing up for what they‌ believe in,‌ even when⁤ it means challenging longstanding policies.

The debate​ surrounding U.S. military aid to Israel is complex and multifaceted. Supporters ‌argue that such aid strengthens ⁢bilateral ties, enhances Israel’s security, and fosters stability in the region. However, critics‍ argue that the ⁤indiscriminate use of weapons may perpetuate violence⁢ and hinder the prospects⁢ for a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

Paul’s resignation adds to the growing chorus of voices questioning the‌ effectiveness and morality of⁤ continued ⁣arms transfers. It⁣ raises​ important questions about the long-term impact⁢ of such actions‍ and​ whether they contribute to a sustainable and just ​solution ‌to the Israeli-Palestinian⁢ conflict.

As ‍the United States continues to navigate ‍its​ role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, it is crucial for policymakers and officials to consider the perspectives of individuals like Josh Paul. Their expertise and insights can offer valuable ​input into​ shaping policies that prioritize​ humanitarian concerns⁢ and promote peaceful dialogue.

It remains to be seen how Paul’s departure will influence the​ ongoing discussions surrounding U.S.⁣ military aid ⁤to Israel. However, his principled stance serves as a‍ reminder that the ​pursuit of ‌peace and justice requires careful consideration and a⁢ willingness to challenge the status quo.

In conclusion, Josh Paul’s resignation ​from the State Department​ highlights his strong opposition to​ sending more ​weapons and ammunition⁣ to ⁣Israel. As a ‍seasoned official specializing in arms transfers, Paul’s decision ‍demonstrates ‌his⁤ conviction that this ⁤impulsive reaction⁤ will only result in more suffering for both Israelis and Palestinians. His departure⁣ raises important questions about the effectiveness and ethical⁣ implications of continued arms transfers and ⁤offers an opportunity for policymakers to reevaluate their approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker