Federal regulators have given the green light to expand the Pacific Northwest gas pipeline.
Federal Regulators Approve Expansion of Natural Gas Pipeline Despite Opposition
In a contentious move on Oct. 19, federal regulators gave the green light to the expansion of a natural gas pipeline in the Pacific Northwest. This decision has sparked objections from environmental groups and senior officials in West Coast states who argue that it contradicts the region’s efforts to combat climate change and could increase the risk of wildfires.
The approved GTN Xpress Project aims to increase the daily capacity of the Gas Transmission Northwest pipeline, which runs through Idaho, Washington, and Oregon, by approximately 150 million cubic feet. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s approval on Thursday allows GTN Xpress to move forward with its plans.
TC Energy, the pipeline’s owner, intends to modify compressor stations in Kootenai County, Idaho, Walla Walla County, Washington, and Sherman County, Oregon, to accommodate the expansion. Compressor stations play a crucial role in maintaining pipeline pressure and gas flow over long distances.
Related Stories
-
North Dakota Blocks Major Proposed Pipeline
8/4/2023
-
TC Energy’s Dumping of the Keystone Pipeline Is Lamentable
8/12/2023
In a statement posted on their website, TC Energy expressed their appreciation for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s bipartisan approval of the GTN Xpress Project. They emphasized the critical role this project will play in ensuring affordable and reliable energy for consumers in California and the Pacific Northwest. TC Energy is committed to promptly putting the project into service.
Audrey Leonard, a staff attorney for the non-profit environmental organization Columbia Riverkeeper, criticized the decision, stating that it sets a precedent for unnecessary fracked gas in the Northwest. She also accused the energy agency of disregarding the concerns raised by senators, governors, state attorneys general, tribes, and the public.
Leonard highlighted the potential environmental damage and increased wildfire risk associated with spills and explosions on the aging pipeline. She announced that Columbia Riverkeeper will file a petition for a rehearing in response to the regulators’ decision.
It is worth noting that TC Energy, the corporation behind this pipeline, was also responsible for the now-defunct Keystone XL crude oil pipeline.
Opponents of the project, including officials and environmentalists, have expressed concerns about TC Energy’s safety record. Recent incidents, such as the explosion of its Columbia Gas Transmission pipeline in Virginia and the significant crude oil leak from its Keystone pipeline in Kansas, have raised doubts about the company’s ability to ensure safety.
Oregon, Washington, and California have enacted legislation mandating a transition to 100 percent renewable electricity sources by 2040 and 2045, respectively. The attorneys general of these states argue that the GTN Xpress Project, as indicated by the energy agency’s draft environmental impact statement, will result in substantial annual emissions of greenhouse gases for the next three decades.
Prior to commencing construction, the agency has suggested that the company provide environmental mitigation training to its employees and contractors. However, environmental groups argue that this assessment fails to adequately address the project’s overall damage, including the use of hydraulic fracturing to extract natural gas for the pipeline.
This development comes just months after North Dakota officials blocked a proposed carbon capture pipeline on Aug. 4, siding with landowners who opposed the project.
Summit Carbon Solutions had planned to construct a 320-mile carbon dioxide pipeline in the state to transport greenhouse emissions from ethanol plants to an underground storage facility. However, the North Dakota Public Service Commission unanimously denied the requested siting permit. The company now has the option to reapply for a permit or take the matter to court.
Farmers in South Dakota have also united against a similar project that would cut through productive areas of their family farms.
What are the concerns raised by environmental groups in the Pacific Northwest regarding natural gas pipelines and how do they impact the environment and efforts to combat climate change
Project. The Keystone XL pipeline faced widespread opposition from environmental groups and Indigenous activists, and its cancellation by the Biden administration was celebrated as a victory for climate action and Indigenous rights.
The approval of the GTN Xpress Project has deeply disappointed those who were hopeful for a shift towards cleaner energy alternatives and a more sustainable future. Critics argue that the expansion of natural gas infrastructure contradicts the region’s commitments to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and transitioning to renewable energy sources.
Environmental groups in the Pacific Northwest have long raised concerns about the risks associated with natural gas pipelines. They argue that pipeline leaks and ruptures can result in significant harm to the environment, including soil and water contamination, as well as increased methane emissions – a potent greenhouse gas. Additionally, the aging infrastructure of the pipeline raises concerns about its integrity, increasing the risk of accidents that could have catastrophic consequences.
The approval of the GTN Xpress Project also disregards the concerns and objections of senior officials in West Coast states. Governors, senators, and state attorneys general have voiced their opposition to the project, recognizing the potential threat it poses to the region’s efforts to combat climate change and protect its natural resources. The decision undermines the collaborative efforts of these leaders to advance clean energy initiatives and reduce dependency on fossil fuels.
While TC Energy emphasizes the importance of the project in ensuring affordable and reliable energy for consumers, it is crucial to consider the long-term implications of relying on natural gas. As the world increasingly shifts towards renewable energy sources, investing in the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure may hinder the transition and lock the region into a carbon-intensive energy system.
The controversy surrounding the approval of the GTN Xpress Project highlights the ongoing tensions between economic development, energy security, and environmental sustainability. Balancing these competing interests requires careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits associated with different energy projects, as well as meaningful engagement with affected communities and stakeholders.
The decision by federal regulators to approve the expansion of the natural gas pipeline in the Pacific Northwest has ignited a heated debate. It poses fundamental questions about the region’s commitment to addressing climate change, protecting the environment, and charting a sustainable path forward. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how the project will ultimately impact the region, its communities, and its broader environmental goals.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...