Economic freedom empowers women to have bigger families.
Women’s Desire for More Children and the Role of Economic Freedom
A new paper suggests that greater economic freedom could pave the way for larger family sizes, as women desire more children than they actually have. Recent surveys reveal that American women express the highest level of happiness with 2.5 children, yet the average number of children they have is only around 1.7. This creates a “fertility gap” that researchers Clara Piano and Lyman Stone believe can be influenced by state policies that define economic freedom.
According to Piano, economic freedom encompasses the degree to which policies and institutions support personal choice, voluntary exchange, market competition, and the security of personal and privately owned property. As women’s education and employment opportunities have increased, the primary cost of fertility has shifted to the mother’s time. Choosing to spend time raising children often means forgoing greater earnings.
Piano and Stone examined economic factors such as government spending, taxation, and labor market freedom in all 50 states to assess their level of economic freedom. Comparing these scores to desired family size versus achieved family size, they discovered that a one standard deviation improvement in economic freedom could potentially close the fertility gap by 30%. In simpler terms, if a state like Minnesota offered greater economic freedom, its fertility rate could resemble that of Kansas.
Unlike previous research that focused on demographic differences, Piano and Stone took an institutional approach by investigating how policy environments that empower women’s economic choices relate to the gap between desired and actual fertility. They found that greater job availability and flexible schedules enable women to both earn income and raise more children. This flexibility, combined with the narrowing income gap between men and women, contributes to the overall happiness of women and the well-being of their children.
Furthermore, flexibility reduces the costs associated with childbearing and childrearing, making it easier for women to have more children. Areas with higher levels of economic freedom are more likely to offer family-friendly policies, as employees value flexibility and prioritize their families. Piano and Stone suggest that states interested in pro-family policies should consider measures that expand economic freedom, including a less restrictive regulatory environment and the implementation of right-to-work laws and occupational licensing requirements.
Read more from The Washington Examiner: Click here
What is the impact of economic freedom on women’s decision to have more children?
Nd property rights. It is a measure of the ability of individuals to make economic decisions without interference from the government or other external forces. Piano argues that when women have more economic freedom, they are more likely to have more children.
One of the key reasons, according to Piano and Stone, is that economic freedom provides women with greater opportunities for employment and entrepreneurship. When women have the freedom to choose their careers and pursue economic activities, they are more likely to delay marriage and childbirth. This delay allows them to gain education, skills, and financial stability, which are essential for raising a larger family.
Furthermore, economic freedom also leads to greater access to healthcare, social services, and childcare facilities. When women have the freedom to make choices regarding their reproductive health and childcare, they are more likely to have more children. This is because they can plan their pregnancies better, access prenatal and postnatal care, and have the support system necessary to balance work and family life.
In contrast, when women face economic constraints and limited opportunities for employment, they are less likely to have larger families. Economic constraints create barriers to education, healthcare, and childcare, making it challenging for women to balance the demands of work and family. As a result, they may choose to have fewer children or delay having children altogether.
The findings of this research have significant implications for policymakers. Piano and Stone argue that policies promoting economic freedom can help bridge the fertility gap and encourage larger family sizes. Governments can support economic freedom by removing barriers to entrepreneurship, investing in education and healthcare, and ensuring equal opportunities for women in the workforce.
Moreover, policies that provide affordable childcare, parental leave, and flexible work arrangements can also contribute to empowering women to have more children. By creating an environment that supports women’s economic and personal choices, policymakers can positively influence the desires of women for larger families.
However, it is important to note that economic freedom alone is not the sole determinant of women’s desire for more children. Cultural, social, and personal factors also play a significant role. Nonetheless, by acknowledging the role of economic freedom in shaping family sizes, policymakers can formulate effective strategies to address the fertility gap.
In conclusion, greater economic freedom can pave the way for larger family sizes as women desire more children than they actually have. Policies that promote economic freedom by empowering women with education, employment opportunities, and support systems can bridge the fertility gap. Understanding the relationship between economic freedom and women’s desires for more children can inform policymakers and contribute to the development of family-friendly policies that support women’s choices and wellbeing.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...