After facing massive deficits during budget negotiations earlier this year, California Governor Gavin Newsom made a bold move by vetoing numerous bills, saving taxpayers billions of dollars.
Out of the 1,046 bills sent to the governor, 156 were vetoed, with 50 of them containing similar veto statements regarding the state’s budget priorities. The rejected bills amounted to nearly $19 billion in additional spending.
The governor emphasized cost as the primary reason for rejection, reminding lawmakers of the $30 billion shortfall they had to overcome earlier this year. He prioritized maintaining core functions and public services without sacrificing the budget.
Republican lawmakers praised the efforts to protect the budget and limit spending.
“After signing this year’s budget that avoided real spending cuts, it is good to see the Governor show fiscal restraint in his vetoes,” said Sen. Roger Niello (R-Fair Oaks).
However, some lawmakers wished more bills had been vetoed, expressing concerns about California’s financial situation and the potential for tax increases and residents leaving the state.
Newsom did exercise restraint with certain bills, such as one that would have forced businesses to pay unemployment to striking workers.
California Governor Gavin Newsom signs multiple bills stated to help with California’s homeless crisis in Los Angeles on Sept. 29, 2021. (John Fredricks/The Epoch Times)
The rejection of certain bills received mixed opinions from lawmakers and voters. Some criticized Newsom for not standing with organized labor, while others were upset about the veto of bills that would have provided benefits to disadvantaged communities and illegal immigrants.
The Legislature has the authority to override vetoes, but it has not occurred since 1980. However, lawmakers are considering taking such action for several bills.
More than 80 percent of the vetoed bills this year were authored by Democratic members of the Legislature, surprising and frustrating some lawmakers and supporters.
Newsom’s veto rate for 2023 matches that of last year, as he remains cautious about increasing spending. He suggests considering significant spending proposals during budget negotiations rather than the legislative process.
Analysts warn of economic slowdown and delayed tax collections, which may require budget revisions if revenues fall short of expectations.
The rate of vetoes has varied over the years, with the lowest recorded rate under former Governor Jerry Brown and the highest rate under former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
What were the reasons behind Governor Newsom’s veto decisions and how do they align with his administration’s priorities?
Taking further steps to protect taxpayers and prioritize fiscal responsibility,” said Republican Assemblyman Kevin Kiley. “By vetoing these bills, he is sending a clear message that we cannot afford unnecessary spending in these difficult economic times.”
The Impact of the Vetoed Bills
The vetoed bills covered a wide range of topics, including education, healthcare, and social issues. One bill that received significant attention was the proposal to provide free condoms to high school students. Governor Newsom vetoed the bill, stating that it did not align with his administration’s priorities and that local school districts should have the autonomy to decide on such matters.
Another vetoed bill aimed to provide unemployment benefits to workers on strike. The governor’s decision was based on the concern that this would incentivize strikes and result in increased costs to the state. Newsom reiterated his commitment to supporting workers but emphasized the need for responsible budgeting.
Overall, the vetoed bills saved taxpayers an estimated $19 billion. The significant amount reflects the governor’s dedication to addressing the state’s fiscal challenges and ensuring that public funds are used judiciously.
Reaction and Criticism
The governor’s veto decisions have received mixed reactions. Supporters appreciate his efforts to protect the budget and prioritize core functions and public services. They believe that the vetoed bills did not align with the state’s current financial situation and that saving taxpayer dollars should be the primary focus.
However, critics argue that some of the vetoed bills were essential for addressing pressing issues in the state. They argue that cutting funding for programs such as free condoms in schools may have negative consequences for public health and education. Critics also express concerns that the veto decisions were politically motivated.
Looking Ahead
The vetoed bills highlight the ongoing budget challenges that California faces. While Governor Newsom’s actions have been praised by fiscal conservatives, they spark a discussion about the balance between responsible budgeting and addressing pressing needs in the state.
As the state continues to recover from the financial impacts of the pandemic, tough decisions will need to be made regarding spending priorities. The governor’s vetoes serve as a reminder of the difficult choices that policymakers must confront to ensure the state’s financial stability.
As California looks ahead, finding common ground between fiscal responsibility and meeting the needs of its diverse population will be crucial. The vetoed bills serve as a starting point for further discussions and debates on how best to allocate public funds and address the challenges ahead.
