Biden’s Global Turmoil Validates Rival’s Strong Foreign Policy
The world is in chaos. The Middle East is ablaze, Eastern Europe is trapped in war, America’s southern border resembles a scene from “Mad Max,” and Southeast Asia is a ticking time bomb. President Joe Biden has taken the reins after four years of relative peace under President Donald Trump, but the world seems to be spiraling towards mayhem. It’s worth exploring why Trump’s unconventional approach to foreign affairs yielded better results than Biden’s return to normalcy.
The current situation in the Middle East is a perfect example of the contrast between the two presidents. Most recently, under Biden’s watch, Iranian-backed Hamas terrorists attacked Israel, killing civilians and even taking American hostages.
Israel
In 2017, President Trump made the bold decision to move the U.S. embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, against the advice of the diplomatic service and his own secretaries of state and defense. While critics called it reckless, Trump stood by his decision, prioritizing his gut instincts over conventional thinking.
Biden’s criticism of Trump’s move revealed his inclination to follow the well-worn path of prioritizing Palestinian interests. Trump, on the other hand, pursued normalization agreements between Israel and Arab leaders, forcing the Palestinians to negotiate in good faith or risk being left behind. These groundbreaking Abraham Accords could have been built upon by Biden, but instead, his actions may lead to the proliferation of nuclear weapons in Iran and increased focus on the Middle East.
Iran
In late 2019, Iran was launching attacks on U.S. forces. Trump responded with a decisive strike that killed Qasem Soleimani, Iran’s terrorist mastermind. Biden, however, panicked and warned of a major conflict. Trump’s demonstration of hard power, coupled with economic sanctions, finally deterred Iran from terrorizing the region.
Upon taking office, Biden reverted to the failed ways of the past, pursuing a new nuclear deal with Iran and making concessions without receiving genuine commitments. This approach allowed Iran to support Hamas terrorists and advance its nuclear capabilities, all while duping the Biden administration.
Saudi Arabia
As Israel retaliates against Hamas and the Biden administration struggles to contain the spread of war, American diplomats are finding it difficult to rally support from U.S. partners and allies in the region. This brings us to Saudi Arabia, another stark contrast between Trump and Biden.
Trump prioritized building relationships with Saudi Arabia, signaling America’s commitment to doing business with the Arab world and isolating Iran. Biden, however, declared he would make Saudi Arabia an international pariah and suspended weapons sales. This decision backfired, as the Saudis turned to China for security and economic cooperation.
Stark Contrast
The Biden administration’s lecturing of strategic partners while cozying up to Iran is a strange position from which to claim the moral high ground. Trump, on the other hand, had the courage to endure criticism and pursue outcomes that were previously deemed impossible. He understood the importance of deterring America’s enemies and was willing to make deals in tough neighborhoods to promote peace and stability.
These examples from just one region highlight the contrast between Trump and Biden. Trump shaped global events, while Biden reacts to them. It’s no wonder that Biden has been criticized for his foreign policy decisions throughout his career. Breathless moralizing and condescension do not lead to diplomatic success. It’s clear that Trump’s unorthodox approach yielded better results than Biden’s return to normalcy.
rnrn
How has Biden’s soft rhetoric towards Russia affected their actions in Ukraine
H has emboldened Iran and weakened U.S. influence in the region. It is clear that Trump’s tough stance on Iran was more effective in deterring their aggression.
The situation in Eastern Europe is another area where Trump’s unconventional approach yielded better results. Under Trump’s administration, NATO nations were pressured to increase defense spending, leading to a stronger alliance and a more unified front against Russian aggression. Trump’s direct engagement with Russian President Vladimir Putin, including tough sanctions and military support for Ukraine, sent a clear message that the United States would not tolerate Russian incursions into sovereign territories.
In contrast, Biden’s return to traditional diplomacy and soft rhetoric has only emboldened Putin. It is no coincidence that Russian troops amassed at the Ukrainian border shortly after Biden took office. While Biden has condemned Russia’s actions, his lack of decisive action and failure to provide significant military support to Ukraine has sent a message of weakness.
America’s southern border is another issue where Trump’s approach was more effective. His prioritization of border security and strict immigration policies resulted in a significant decrease in illegal border crossings. The construction of the border wall and the implementation of the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) played a crucial role in deterring undocumented immigrants from attempting to enter the United States.
However, Biden’s reversal of Trump’s immigration policies and his failure to address the border crisis effectively has led to a surge in illegal border crossings. The humanitarian crisis at the southern border is now at an all-time high, with overcrowded detention facilities and a lack of resources to process and care for migrants.
In Southeast Asia, Trump’s tough stance on China led to significant progress in countering their aggressive tactics. The Trump administration implemented tariffs and economic pressure to address unfair trade practices and intellectual property theft. Trump’s emphasis on a free and open Indo-Pacific region rallied regional allies to join forces in reining in China’s expansionist ambitions.
Biden, on the other hand, has taken a more conciliatory approach towards China. His lack of action on trade issues and failure to hold China accountable for human rights abuses and unfair trade practices has undermined U.S. influence in the region. Southeast Asian nations are increasingly facing pressure from China and are looking for alternative partnerships to counterbalance China’s dominance.
In conclusion, while Trump’s unconventional approach to foreign affairs may have been met with criticism, there is no denying that it yielded better results compared to Biden’s return to normalcy. Trump’s bold decisions, tough stance, and prioritization of American interests were more effective in deterring aggression, protecting American borders, and rallying allies to address global challenges. Biden’s more traditional approach may lead to further chaos and instability in the world. It is important to re-evaluate and learn from the successes and failures of past administrations to guide future foreign policy decisions.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...