Washington Examiner

Does Medicaid expansion benefit the poor?

Medicaid Expansion: A Game of Politics and Health

In 2023, three states — North Carolina, ⁢North Dakota, and South Dakota — made a bold move by expanding⁤ their Medicaid ⁣programs, joining the ranks of 41‍ other states. As we approach 2024, the pressure is ‍mounting on the ​remaining holdout states to follow ⁤suit. But amidst all the‌ political maneuvering, ⁢one question remains unanswered: has this expansion truly improved the health of the poor?

Medicaid, a state and⁣ federal program designed to provide coverage for those in ‍poverty, was mandated to expand under the Affordable Care Act⁣ in 2010. This required states to extend their Medicaid programs to cover up to 138% of the federal poverty level. However, the Supreme Court later ​ruled that while the federal government couldn’t force states to expand the program, states could still choose ⁢to opt in. In 2014, half of the states declined to expand Medicaid, but that number has gradually dwindled down to nine.

The Battle in​ Wyoming

Efforts to expand Medicaid continue even in states where success seems unlikely. ⁣In early 2023, the Revenue Committee in ‌the Wyoming House of Representatives ​approved a bill for expansion, only to see it die⁢ due to the inaction of Republican House Majority Leader Chip Neiman. This marked the ninth failure of ‌Medicaid expansion in the Cowboy State. The closest ⁣it ever came was in 2016 when ‍expansion supporters attempted to attach it as ‌a​ budget amendment, but it ⁣was defeated.

Josh Hannes, vice president of ⁤the Wyoming Hospital Association, expressed his frustration, stating that conservative legislators opposing the expansion have been the main obstacle. Despite the challenges, Hannes believes that someone will introduce an expansion bill in 2024, and the association will support it.

The Coverage ‍Gap and​ Access to Care

States that choose not to expand Medicaid leave behind a “coverage gap” where individuals earn too much to⁣ qualify for Medicaid but ⁣not enough⁣ to receive tax subsidies for private ⁤coverage. Recent research from the Commonwealth Fund suggests‌ that expanding ⁢Medicaid improves access‍ to care for those who would otherwise fall into this gap. Sharon Glied, co-author‌ of the research, highlights that providing health insurance leads to better access to healthcare, with Medicaid beneficiaries being more likely to have​ checkups ⁤and seek preventive care.

However, access to coverage doesn’t necessarily guarantee improved health outcomes. Nino Owcherenko Schaefer, director of ⁣the Center for Health and Welfare Policy at the Heritage Foundation, emphasizes the complexity of treating‍ the Medicaid population. One issue is the reluctance of many physicians to see Medicaid patients or​ take on new ones. A survey conducted in 2019 found ​that⁤ primary‍ care doctors in expansion states were no more likely to​ see Medicaid patients than before‍ the expansion.

The Oregon Experiment and the Debate

In 2013, the New England Journal of Medicine published the results of a Medicaid experiment in Oregon. The study compared the health outcomes of those admitted to the ⁤Medicaid‌ program through a lottery with those who were not. Surprisingly, the study found that Medicaid coverage​ only improved mental health outcomes, with no significant benefits for common health problems like diabetes or high blood pressure.

Despite these findings, Glied argues that states should⁣ still expand Medicaid as it‌ provides protection from high medical bills. ​However, Owcherenko Schaefer warns that expanding Medicaid can divert funds from other healthcare​ priorities, particularly among children in the traditional Medicaid population.

As the debate rages on, ⁣the future of Medicaid expansion⁢ remains uncertain. Will more states join ⁣the movement, or will they continue to resist the pressure? Only time will tell.

Click here to read more from The Washington Examiner.

What are the consequences of the coverage gap‌ in private insurance ‍for low-income individuals?

‌ T enough to afford private insurance.⁢ This gap creates a significant barrier to healthcare access for millions of low-income ⁣individuals. According to​ a report ⁣by⁣ the Kaiser Family Foundation, as of 2021, approximately 2.2 million uninsured adults fall ‍into this‌ coverage gap.

The consequences of the coverage gap​ are severe. Those who are ⁣unable to afford health insurance often delay or forego necessary medical care, leading ‍to worsened​ health outcomes and increased healthcare costs‌ in ⁣the‌ long run. Additionally, the burden of uncompensated care ⁢falls on hospitals⁢ and healthcare providers, putting ⁣a strain on their resources and potentially leading to a‍ reduction in services, especially in rural areas with fewer healthcare ⁢facilities.

The⁣ Benefits of Medicaid Expansion

Numerous studies have shown the positive impact of Medicaid expansion⁢ on both the ​health of individuals and the overall healthcare system. Research conducted by‌ the National Bureau of‍ Economic Research found that states that expanded⁤ Medicaid experienced a decrease in mortality rates and an improvement in self-reported health ⁣among low-income adults.⁤ Another ​study published in the⁤ New​ England Journal of Medicine showed that⁣ expansion states had significantly higher rates of insurance coverage, lower rates of cost-related⁣ access problems, and ⁢higher rates of regular healthcare utilization‍ compared to non-expansion states.

Moreover, Medicaid expansion has proven to be an ⁣economic boon for states. By expanding Medicaid, states can draw down federal funding, which helps ‌stimulate their ​economies and create jobs in⁣ the healthcare ⁤sector.​ According to a report by⁣ Families USA, Medicaid expansion ‌could create 157,000 jobs across ‍all states by⁤ 2023.

The Political Divisions

The decision of whether ⁢to‍ expand‍ Medicaid has become a highly politicized​ issue. The debate often revolves around ideological‍ differences and concerns about the costs and sustainability of the program. ⁣Opponents argue that ‍Medicaid expansion will lead to increased taxes‍ and⁤ a heavy financial burden⁤ on the states in the long term. They also express ‍concerns ⁤about ​the potential for fraud and abuse within the program.

Proponents, on ‌the other hand, emphasize the importance of providing‍ healthcare to the most vulnerable ⁢populations. They argue that the federal ‍government​ covers the majority of⁣ the expansion costs initially,⁢ with ​states gradually taking on a ‌small‌ percentage in the future. They also ‌highlight the‍ positive impact of expansion on the overall population’s health and the economy.

Looking Ahead

As we move forward, it‍ is crucial to recognize that Medicaid expansion is not simply a game of ⁢politics ⁢but‌ a matter of improving the health ‍and well-being of millions of Americans. The experiences of ⁢states that​ have expanded Medicaid demonstrate its⁣ effectiveness in reducing the coverage ‌gap, improving access to care, ⁢and enhancing health outcomes for low-income individuals.

Moving forward, it is vital⁤ for policymakers to consider the evidence⁣ and⁢ prioritize the health of their constituents. Medicaid expansion has proven to be a win-win situation, benefiting both ‌individuals and ⁢the healthcare system as a whole. With the pressure building on‌ the remaining⁢ holdout states, the time has come for a ‌decisive⁤ move towards ​expansion, ensuring ‌that⁤ no one is left behind in their pursuit‍ of health and well-being.


Read More From Original Article Here: Does Medicaid expansion help the poor?

" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker