The epoch times

US munitions production stretched to the max due to military aid provided to Israel and Ukraine.

A ‍Leaked Pentagon Document ⁣Raises Questions About COVID-19 Vaccine Availability​ for Service ⁢Members

A recently leaked Pentagon health document ‍has⁤ sparked ‌controversy, suggesting that the ⁣government may have misled ⁤the public‌ about‌ the availability of FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccines​ for the ⁣military. According to Sergeant Daniel LeMay, an active-duty Air Force member, the ⁣document contradicts⁢ claims made by the government⁤ regarding the timeline of vaccine‍ distribution and‌ the‍ subsequent mandate for service ⁣members to ⁢receive the shot.

Sgt.⁣ LeMay, who spoke to ⁢The Epoch Times on⁢ the condition of anonymity, provided a copy of the Army’s Medical ⁣Material Quality ⁣Control Message (MMQC-22-1268) dated May ‍25, ⁢2022. This document sheds light on‍ the ⁢ordering and implementation guidance for⁤ the Pfizer BioNTech, Cominarty-labeled vaccine for individuals ‌aged 12 and older.

The document’s significance lies in the fact that ​it represents the first set of ordering instructions‌ for Comirnaty, and Sgt.⁣ LeMay believes that it was not circulating through other channels. As ⁢Fort Detrick‍ serves as the central node for vaccine‌ distribution, ⁣this raises questions about the availability of the vaccine prior to ⁤the issuance of the document.

Related Stories

The⁤ Pentagon’s vaccine ​mandate, issued by Secretary Lloyd​ Austin ⁣in August 2021⁤ and subsequently rescinded, ​stated that it applied to FDA-approved⁢ COVID-19 vaccines ‌in ‍accordance with FDA-approved labeling and ⁢guidance. However, a policy issued by the ‌Pentagon‍ a month later ⁢suggested ⁣that the FDA-approved Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines, authorized under the FDA’s Emergency Use ⁢Authorization (EUA), ‍were interchangeable.

Some service members raised objections, arguing that the mandate did not apply to EUA-labeled vaccines. ⁤They claimed that ⁣the military did not ​make ⁣the Cominarty-labeled vaccine available until‍ several months after the mandate was ⁤issued.

In a filing for the federal lawsuit Coker v. Austin, the Department of​ Justice, representing the Defense⁢ Department (DoD), stated that the Comirnaty-labeled⁣ vaccine was indeed available for‍ the DoD to order. However, Sgt. LeMay argues⁣ that the Army’s medical ‌document, dated five days after the filing, contradicts this claim.

Sgt. LeMay’s⁤ discovery raises concerns ‍about ​potential misinformation and the deletion ​of crucial documents.​ He asserts that⁢ the Army⁤ has removed the document ‍from ⁢their database,⁣ making⁤ it inaccessible to Common⁢ Access Card ‌holders. Fortunately, he had ⁢saved‍ a copy of the document, along with several other‌ missing documents whose nature⁣ he did not disclose.

The Epoch Times reached out to the Pentagon and the Department of the Army for comment but did not receive⁢ a ⁣response.

What implications does the leaked ⁣document have‌ on the ​transparency and accountability of the government’s decision-making process within the military

‌M:basis-[120px]”>

The leaked Pentagon document outlines the ordering process for Comirnaty

vaccines, specifically for the military ⁤personnel. It provides details on the ‍quantity ​of vaccines available for ‌order, the distribution schedule, and the prioritization of certain units and personnel. However,‌ what ‍raises concerns is the discrepancy ⁣between the document’s ‌date and the timeline provided by⁣ the government​ regarding the availability and administration of the vaccines⁣ within the military.

According to Sgt.⁣ LeMay, the document suggests that the vaccines⁣ were ‌already ​being ordered and‍ distributed​ prior to any official announcements or guidance⁣ from the government. This contradicts the narrative that the vaccines were made available ​to the military after the general population received their doses. It also raises questions about ⁤the transparency and accuracy of information provided to⁤ service members regarding the vaccine’s ⁣availability.

Furthermore, the document implies that there ⁣may have been​ a mandate for ‍service ‌members to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, even before⁢ such a ‌mandate was officially announced. This contradicts previous statements made⁤ by the government, which indicated that any decisions regarding ⁣mandatory vaccination for military personnel would be communicated in a‍ timely and transparent​ manner.

Sgt.⁣ LeMay’s decision to​ speak ​out and share the leaked ⁣document highlights⁢ the‍ potential ‍discrepancies and inconsistencies in the government’s communication regarding vaccine availability for service members. It raises concerns about ‍the transparency ⁤and accountability of the decision-making process within the ‌military ⁣and the potential impact on the trust and confidence of ⁢service members in their​ leaders.

As ‌the COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose challenges for the military and the nation as a whole, it is crucial for ‌the ​government to​ provide ⁤accurate and timely information regarding vaccine availability and administration. The leaked‍ Pentagon document raises questions about the transparency ⁢and effectiveness of the government’s communication strategy ​and underscores the ⁣need for greater clarity in⁢ addressing the concerns of service​ members regarding the ⁢COVID-19 vaccine.

It is essential for the government to⁤ address these questions‍ and concerns ‍promptly​ and⁢ to​ ensure that⁢ service members are provided with accurate and ⁣reliable information about ‌vaccine ⁤availability and mandates. Maintaining ⁢trust and ⁣confidence in⁣ the government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic is crucial ⁣for the well-being and readiness of the military.

Ultimately, the leaked Pentagon document shines a light on potential‌ discrepancies in the​ government’s communication ‌regarding COVID-19 vaccine availability for service members. It ‍raises questions‌ about the timeline, transparency, and accuracy of‍ information ⁢provided to the military ‌and underscores the need for ​greater accountability and clarity in⁢ addressing ⁤the concerns of service‌ members. The government must take these concerns‌ seriously and take appropriate measures to restore​ trust and‍ confidence in the decision-making ‍process ⁤within the military.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker