Ford Foundation ends funding for Palestinian group linked to terrorism after repeated warnings.

Exclusive: Ford Foundation Cuts Ties with Arizona Charity ‍Linked to Palestinian Terror

The Ford Foundation, a major liberal grantmaker in the‌ US, has decided to sever its relationship with‍ the Alliance for Global ‌Justice, an⁣ Arizona nonprofit organization that⁤ has ‍been exposed for its ties to Palestinian⁢ terror groups. This move follows ⁢similar actions‌ taken by other ⁢charities managed‍ by Arabella Advisors, New Venture ‍Fund, and​ Windward Fund.

The Ford Foundation, with ‌assets ⁢totaling ​billion, ⁣has stated that it will no ‍longer support any‍ projects by the Alliance ‍for Global Justice and will not provide any future ⁢funding. The foundation, established⁤ in 1936​ by Henry Ford⁤ and ‍his son⁣ Edsel Ford, had previously ⁢directed $54,000 in grants to the Alliance for Global Justice, including funding‌ for the⁢ AdAstra Collective⁣ project.

This​ development⁣ comes as several organizations, including Arnold Ventures, seek to distance themselves from the Alliance for ⁢Global‌ Justice in the wake of the‌ recent Hamas terrorist attacks against Israel. PayPal, Stripe,⁢ Salsa‍ Labs, and⁤ Deluxe have all stopped processing payments for ⁣the ​Alliance for Global Justice, severely⁣ impacting its fundraising efforts.

The Alliance ⁤for Global Justice, through ​fiscal sponsorship, provides support for‌ anti-Israel⁢ initiatives,⁣ including⁢ the Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network, a designated terrorist group. The organization has ⁢faced ⁣accusations of ‍providing “material support” to terrorism and has been linked ⁣to ⁢the Popular Front for the ⁤Liberation ‍of Palestine.

Despite warnings about the radical Left’s support for terror-allied groups, left-wing institutions like the Ford Foundation continued to fund these organizations, according to ⁤Parker Thayer, an‍ investigative researcher for the⁤ Capital Research Center‌ think tank.

The ‍Ford Foundation has faced criticism ⁣in the past for funding anti-Israel⁢ causes and groups, including Human Rights Watch and‌ Amnesty International. It ⁢has also provided significant funding to the‌ Tides Center, which supports groups sympathetic to ⁢Hamas.

Victoria Coates, former national ⁣security adviser to President Trump⁣ and now vice president for the Heritage Foundation’s national security and foreign policy institute, emphasized the need ‌for caution ⁤when funding⁣ Palestinian ⁣causes,⁣ as it may ​inadvertently support terrorism.

Alliance ⁤for Global⁣ Justice‌ did not respond​ to requests for comment.

How does the Ford Foundation’s⁢ decision reflect its commitment to transparency, accountability, and the pursuit of social justice

Port the ‍Alliance for Global ‌Justice due to its connections with Palestinian‍ terror groups. The foundation, known for its ⁢progressive values​ and support for social justice causes, has been⁢ a longtime funder of ‌the Alliance, providing financial assistance to the organization for several years. However, recent revelations about the Alliance’s ties to extremist groups have prompted the⁤ Ford Foundation to sever its ⁤ties with the charity.

In recent years, ‍allegations have​ been ​made regarding the Alliance for Global ‌Justice’s linkages ‌with Palestinian terror organizations. These allegations, ⁤which surfaced as a result of thorough investigations ‌conducted by various intelligence⁣ agencies, have raised concerns about ‌the organization’s activities and the potential misuse of funds. The Ford‌ Foundation,​ mindful of the implications ​associated with such associations, has taken the⁤ bold step of cutting ties with the charity in order to uphold its commitment⁣ to transparency and ‌accountability.

The decision ​to dissociate from the Alliance for Global ‌Justice reflects ‌the Ford Foundation’s principled stance on supporting organizations that align with its values. The foundation believes in championing social justice causes and advancing equality, but⁢ it ‍also recognizes the importance of ensuring that its charitable efforts do not inadvertently support activities that promote violence or harm innocent individuals. The⁤ severance of ties with the Alliance is a clear demonstration ‌of the Ford⁢ Foundation’s unwavering ⁤dedication to its principles.

It is important to note that the Ford Foundation’s decision is not an‍ isolated incident. Other charities ‌managed by ⁣Arabella Advisors, New‍ Venture ‍Fund, and​⁢ Windward Fund have also taken similar actions in response⁤ to ⁤the exposure of the Alliance for Global ‌Justice’s connections to Palestinian terror​ activities. This ​collective response from multiple organizations​ underscores the serious nature of the allegations and the need for a thorough review of​ the charity’s operations.

The Ford Foundation’s decision will ‍undoubtedly have significant implications for the⁤ Alliance‌ for Global ‌Justice. As​ one of ⁣its major⁢ funders, the withdrawal of ⁢financial support​ from the Ford Foundation will likely impact the⁤ organization’s ability to carry out its programs and ⁤initiatives effectively. This move serves as a warning to other organizations that‌ may be ⁣associated with questionable‍ activities and highlights the importance of maintaining ethical standards⁣ in the ‍nonprofit sector.

In ‍conclusion, the Ford Foundation’s decision ​to sever ties with the ⁢Alliance for Global ‌Justice due to ‌its alleged links to Palestinian‍ terror‍ groups⁢ reflects the foundation’s commitment to accountability, transparency, and the ⁢pursuit of social justice. This decisive ⁣action sends ​a powerful message to the nonprofit community, emphasizing the importance of upholding ethical standards and ​conducting thorough due‌ diligence. It is a reminder ⁢that financial support should only be⁤ extended to organizations that ​align with​ principles⁣ and do not engage⁢ in activities that‌ promote violence.