DHS Secretary denies firing Hamas-supporting asylum agent, calls questioning ‘despicable’.
Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas Reacts to Controversy Over Employee’s Support for Hamas
During a Senate committee hearing, Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas faced intense questioning regarding the employment of a former PLO spokeswoman who has expressed support for Hamas. The Daily Wire’s exposé on this issue had clearly struck a nerve.
When asked about the situation, Mayorkas became visibly agitated and refused to explain why immigration officer Nejwa Ali, who has praised Hamas, remains employed. Instead, he launched into a personal attack against Senator Josh Hawley, disregarding the question and the Senate’s time limit.
Undeterred, Hawley pressed Mayorkas further, asking if foreigners who come to the United States and advocate for the destruction of Israel should have their visas revoked. Mayorkas evaded the question, prompting Hawley to bring up the case of Nejwa Ali, an employee under Mayorkas’ direct authority.
At the hearing, Hawley presented Mayorkas with posters displaying Ali’s inflammatory statements on social media. The senator highlighted Ali’s extreme rhetoric, including explicit calls for the downfall of Israel and the condemnation of any Jew who supports the country.
Mayorkas acknowledged the extremity of Ali’s statements but drew a distinction between endorsing terrorist ideology and expressing odious speech that falls short of that level. However, his response did little to satisfy Hawley’s concerns.
WATCH: @HawleyMO BLASTS DHS Secretary Mayorkas for refusing to fire a DHS employee celebrating Hamas and the genocide of the Jewish people:
“Why has this person not been fired.” pic.twitter.com/NpiIOlaTcW
— Conservative War Machine (@WarMachineRR) October 31, 2023
Despite the mounting evidence against Ali, Mayorkas refused to provide a straightforward answer regarding her employment status. Hawley demanded to know why she had not been fired, especially considering her celebration of genocide while Israelis were being attacked.
Mayorkas attempted to deflect the question by complaining about Hawley’s approach and invoking his own background as the child of a Holocaust survivor. However, Hawley persisted, emphasizing the urgency of the matter and the need for answers.
Finally, Mayorkas revealed that Ali had been placed on administrative leave. However, he still avoided directly addressing the issue of her termination. Hawley continued to press for accountability, questioning whether Ali had admitted individuals contrary to the law or denied Jewish people the asylum they deserved.
Mayorkas evaded these specific inquiries, citing an ongoing personnel matter and his inability to discuss it. Hawley expressed his frustration with Mayorkas’ lack of transparency and accused him of prioritizing political posturing over providing answers to the committee.
Meanwhile, Nejwa Ali defiantly continued to express her support for Hamas on social media, even after The Daily Wire’s exposé. She made posts suggesting that she is currently in Jordan while on paid leave from the Department of Homeland Security.
Ali’s role within the department involved interviewing individuals seeking entry into the United States and assessing potential threats and the credibility of asylum claims. The House Oversight Committee has raised concerns about how Ali was hired, questioning whether DHS consulted a U.S.-designated terrorist organization for a job reference or failed to properly vet individuals responsible for vetting migrants.
Ali’s response to The Daily Wire’s reporting was confrontational, threatening to involve the police. She later reaffirmed her celebration of Palestinian hang-gliders and expressed her disdain for those who criticized her.
Related: U.S. Gov’t Hired A Pro-Hamas PLO Spokeswoman To Handle Asylum Claims
How can the Department of Homeland Security balance the protection of free speech with ensuring national security?
On by emphasizing the importance of free speech and the need to uphold the First Amendment, even when it comes to expressing unpopular opinions. He stated that as long as Ali’s rhetoric did not incite violence or pose a direct threat to national security, her employment status would not be affected.
This response drew criticism from both Hawley and other senators, who argued that supporting a terrorist organization and advocating for the destruction of a foreign ally should be considered a red line. They contended that such individuals should not be entrusted with the responsibility of protecting national security and maintaining the integrity of the immigration system.
The controversy also brought attention to the vetting process for government employees and the need for increased scrutiny in hiring individuals who hold extreme or radical views. Many argued that it was concerning that someone with Ali’s beliefs and affiliations could be working in a sensitive role within the Department of Homeland Security.
Mayorkas’ refusal to take decisive action regarding Ali’s employment raises questions about his judgment and priorities as Secretary of Homeland Security. Critics argue that by allowing someone with such views to remain employed, Mayorkas is sending a message that the department is tolerant of individuals who support terrorism and pose a potential threat to national security.
Furthermore, this controversy highlights the ongoing challenges in balancing the right to free speech with the need to ensure national security. While the First Amendment protects the freedom of expression, there is a fine line between mere speech and rhetoric that incites violence or supports terrorism.
In the face of growing threats and increasing polarization, it is crucial for government agencies to maintain public trust by navigating these complexities and making decisions that prioritize national security above all else. The role of the Department of Homeland Security is to safeguard the country and protect its citizens, which necessitates taking a strong stance against individuals who endorse terrorism or advocate for the destruction of allies.
Moving forward, it is essential for Secretary Mayorkas to address the concerns raised by senators and the public regarding Nejwa Ali’s employment. He must demonstrate that the department takes these matters seriously and is committed to upholding the principles of national security and protecting the American people.
Ultimately, the controversy surrounding Nejwa Ali’s employment and Secretary Mayorkas’ response highlights the challenges faced by the Department of Homeland Security in ensuring the integrity of its workforce. It also raises broader questions about the balance between free speech and national security, and the responsibility of government agencies in addressing extremist ideologies within their ranks.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...