Ex-Johns Hopkins SAIS Dean Supports Accusation of Israeli ‘Genocide’
Former Johns Hopkins SAIS Professor Accuses Israel of Committing “Genocide”
In a bold statement, Vali Nasr, the former dean of the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, has supported the claim that Israel is engaged in “genocide.”
Nasr, who served as the school’s dean from 2012 to 2019 and currently works as a professor at the institution, recently shared a resignation letter from the head of the New York office of the United Nations’ High Commission for Human Rights on Twitter. According to Nasr, the last paragraph of the letter “best tells how international law & international rules based order are coming apart.”
The opening sentence of the final paragraph of the letter states, “This is a text-book case of genocide.” It goes on to describe the European, ethno-nationalist, settler colonial project in Palestine as entering its final phase, leading to the expedited destruction of the last remnants of indigenous Palestinian life in Palestine.
Last paragraph best tells how international law & international rules based order are coming apart, with the support of the very world powers that tout its values & claim to be defending it. The American-backed world order will not be able to easily reverse this blow to its… https://t.co/6mO0PnNByS
— Vali Nasr (@vali_nasr) November 1, 2023
The letter, dated October 28, also accuses the governments of the United States, United Kingdom, and other European countries of being “wholly complicit in the horrific assault” and actively supporting Israel’s atrocities through arms, economic intelligence, and political and diplomatic cover.
Nasr expressed his belief that the American-backed world order will struggle to regain its credibility after this blow.
Despite a request for comment, Nasr did not respond.
It is worth noting that Nasr is not the only college professor to make controversial statements regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Cornell professor Russell Rickford, for instance, is currently on a leave of absence after referring to Hamas’s October 7 terror attacks as “exhilarating” and “energizing” during a speech at a protest. He later apologized for his comments, clarifying that he condemns the killing of civilians and was referring to the initial moments of resistance when the apartheid wall was breached.
Why is it important to approach discussions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict with nuance and an open mind
Ngaging in “a form of genocide that has been going on for decades.”
Nasr’s endorsement of this statement has ignited a significant debate within the academic community, with many scholars and experts questioning the validity of such a claim. The accusation of genocide is a grave one, and it requires rigorous evidence and a thorough analysis of historical and legal contexts.
Genocide, as defined by the United Nations’ Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, refers to specific acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group. These acts include killing members of the group, causing serious bodily or mental harm, deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the group’s physical destruction, imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group, and forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. To label a situation as genocide, there must be clear evidence of these acts being perpetrated with the specific intent to destroy a particular group.
While the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is undoubtedly complex and has resulted in immense suffering for both Israelis and Palestinians, the claim of genocide is highly controversial. Critics argue that such a label oversimplifies the intricacies of the conflict and fails to consider the complexities of the historical and political context.
Furthermore, the accusation of genocide undermines the importance of precision in defining and addressing such grave crimes. It dilutes the gravity of the term and risks detracting from ongoing efforts to prevent and punish actual instances of genocide worldwide.
It is essential to approach discussions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict with nuance and an open mind. The situation requires a comprehensive understanding of the historical, political, and socio-cultural factors that have perpetuated the conflict for decades. Constructive dialogue and engagement are crucial to finding a just and lasting solution.
It is also important to note that criticizing specific policies or actions of a government should not be conflated with accusing a country of committing genocide. Governments and their policies are subject to critique and analysis, but the charge of genocide carries a weighty moral and legal significance that should not be thrown around indiscriminately.
In conclusion, Vali Nasr’s endorsement of the accusation of genocide against Israel is a highly contentious stance. It is crucial to approach such claims with skepticism and a rigorous examination of the evidence and context. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict deserves thoughtful analysis and nuanced discussions that take into account the complexities of the situation. Accurate terminology and careful consideration of legal and moral implications are essential in addressing the conflict and working towards a peaceful resolution.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...