Biden’s Plan Could Cancel Your Next Western Adventure.
Protecting Access to Public Lands: A Battle for Freedom
Imagine a future where the great open spaces of the American West are closed off to you, your children, and future generations. This is the alarming plan being implemented by the federal government, which aims to replace the current “use and let use” system with a permission-based approach that requires reservations, permits, and closures.
Recently, the Bureau of Land Management made a final decision to close 317 miles of historic off-road trails near Moab, Utah. These trails, beloved by Jeep owners, dirt bike riders, and base jumpers, have provided endless adventure and excitement for decades. With names like Gemini Bridges, Mashed Potatoes, and Dead Cow Trail, they have become iconic destinations for outdoor enthusiasts.
But this is just the beginning. The plan to restrict access to public lands is already underway, threatening the freedom enjoyed by millions of Americans who hike, camp, bike, fish, and explore the vast wilderness of the West. These lands have always been open to everyone, without entrance fees or permits. It is a unifying experience that transcends class, creed, color, and political affiliation.
For those who have experienced the beauty and serenity of these public lands, the assault on our freedom to roam is deeply concerning. The federal government’s aggressive trail closures are part of a larger plan called “30×30,” which aims to conserve 30% of U.S. lands and waters by 2030. However, there is no evidence that the current users of these trails have caused any significant damage. In fact, these lands have been cherished and respected for years.
That is why organizations like the BlueRibbon Coalition and the Colorado Offroad Trail Defenders are challenging these closures in court. They understand that this plan is not about conservation, but rather about limiting access for certain groups of outdoor enthusiasts. The freedom to enjoy activities like overlanding, dirt biking, and off-roading is under threat.
Those who do not understand the appeal of these activities may see it as a paradox, but for those of us who engage in them, it is a way of life. We love the wilderness and teach our children to respect and care for it. We pick up trash left by others and ensure that the rules are followed. The motorized travel community self-enforces an ethic of respect for public lands.
The closures near Moab are a critical test case for the future of public land access. If these lands can be closed, then no place is safe. Americans have proven themselves to be responsible stewards of their public lands, and they deserve the freedom to enjoy them for generations to come.
What can be done to strike a balance between preserving public lands and allowing for continued public enjoyment and utilization
The decision to close these trails is part of a larger trend in the federal government’s management of public lands. Over the past few years, we have seen an increasing push to tighten restrictions, limit access, and control how we can enjoy and benefit from our own natural resources. This shift in policy has sparked a heated debate between those who prioritize preservation and environmental protection and those who advocate for continued access and multiple use of public lands.
Proponents of the new approach argue that stricter regulations are necessary to protect the fragile ecosystems and endangered species that inhabit these lands. They claim that the current “use and let use” system has resulted in significant damage to the environment, including soil erosion, habitat destruction, and pollution. By implementing a permission-based approach, they believe that they can better manage and preserve these lands for future generations.
On the other hand, opponents of these measures argue that they infringe on our fundamental rights and freedoms. They argue that public lands should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to obtain a permit or reservation. They believe that these lands belong to the people and that the government should not be allowed to dictate how and when we can enjoy them. Furthermore, they contend that responsible usage and education are more effective in preserving the environment than simply restricting access.
While it is important to acknowledge the need for preservation and conservation, it is equally important to strike a balance that allows for continued public enjoyment and utilization of our lands. Public lands are a vital part of our heritage, providing opportunities for recreation, economic growth, and cultural enrichment. Closing off vast areas of these lands not only restricts our freedom but also limits the potential for economic growth and innovation in the communities that rely on outdoor tourism and related industries.
Instead of focusing solely on restrictions and closures, we should encourage responsible land use practices and invest in education and outreach programs that promote stewardship and sustainability. By empowering individuals and communities to become active participants in the preservation of our public lands, we can ensure their long-term health and accessibility.
The battle for access to public lands ultimately comes down to striking a balance between preservation and utilization. This requires open and honest dialogue between stakeholders, including government agencies, environmental organizations, outdoor enthusiasts, and local communities. It also necessitates thoughtful and evidence-based decision-making that takes into account the diverse needs and values of our society.
As individuals who cherish the freedom to explore and enjoy the great outdoors, we must not remain silent in this battle. We must advocate for policies that protect our access to public lands while also preserving their natural beauty and ecological integrity. By doing so, we can ensure that future generations will have the opportunity to experience the joy and wonder of these vast open spaces.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...