The epoch times

House Passes Bill to Cut IRS Funding, Increase Aid to Israel

The House Votes to Provide Supplemental Funding to Israel Amid Conflict with Terror Groups

The ‌House of Representatives made a significant decision on ⁢November 2nd, advancing a bill to provide⁢ additional funding to Israel during its ‌ongoing war‌ with the Hamas and Hezbollah terror groups. Surprisingly, all 203 Democrats voted ​against ⁣the bill, creating a contentious atmosphere.

The supplemental‍ funding ‌ was approved by a narrow margin ‍of 213-203, potentially indicating ⁣the outcome of ⁤the final vote expected later that‌ day.
‌ ⁢

The bill aims to allocate the requested⁣ $14.3 billion by the ⁣Biden administration. ‌However,​ Democrats strongly oppose ⁤the bill due to its provision of equal cuts to IRS ‍funding under the Inflation⁢ Reduction Act,⁢ which they consider unacceptable.

According⁤ to the Congressional Budget Office, this legislation would result in a net increase in the deficit of $12.5 billion over the​ next decade, as it would decrease ⁤revenues by⁤ $26.8 billion⁢ during that‍ period.
⁤ ​

The⁢ bill specifically designates $4.4 billion for defense maintenance until September 30, 2025, and ​requires the‍ Secretary of Defense ⁣to notify ‌Congress⁣ at least 15 days​ in advance⁤ of ⁤any ‌fund⁤ transfers.

Furthermore, the legislation sets aside $801.4 million ‍for Israel’s ⁤army⁣ ammunition procurement,⁣ $10 million for naval weapons acquisitions, and $38.6 million for air ​force missile procurement, all valid until September 30, 2026.

Most notably, ⁢the bill⁢ allocates $4 billion for the Iron Dome missile​ defense and David’s Sling air defense systems, which can be utilized until September 30, 2026. Although there is no specific funding for the Arrow⁤ missile defense systems, it is possible that the air ‍force missile procurement could be ‌used for that purpose.

Additionally, ‌the bill designates $1.35 billion for research, development, testing, ‌and evaluating ⁤Israel’s defense until September 30, 2025. Out ⁣of this amount, $1.2 billion can be utilized for ​the development of ⁤the Iron Beam ⁤defense system, specifically designed to intercept short-range⁣ rockets.

Finally, the bill sets aside ⁢$3.65 billion for State Department operations in Israel until September 30, 2025.

Despite its passage in the‍ House, the bill is expected to face significant opposition in the Senate. Senator Patty Murray (D-Wash.), ‌the Senate⁢ president pro tempore and chairwoman of ⁣the Senate Appropriations‍ Committee, predicts that the bill will be “dead on arrival.”

The ⁣White House has ⁢made it clear⁣ that President Joe Biden would veto ⁤the bill if⁢ it were to reach his ​desk.

Reaction ⁢to IRS ⁣Offset

The‌ Office of Management and Budget (OMB), a⁤ part of the White House,⁤ expressed disappointment in a statement, stating that the bill fails to address the urgent national security needs in a bipartisan manner. OMB criticized the bill for deepening divisions and eroding⁤ historic bipartisan support for Israel’s security.

OMB further highlighted that the bill introduces partisanship into support for Israel, turning it into a political pawn at ⁢a time⁢ when unity is crucial. The agency ‌also noted the omission of humanitarian assistance for Palestinians.

According to OMB, ​the bill’s provision to ⁤strip IRS funding sets a dangerous precedent by politicizing support for Israel and‍ treating ⁤it differently from other allies. They referred to this provision as a “poison pill.”

However, Republicans defended the IRS offset in the‍ bill, praising it as a strong ⁤move⁣ to⁢ independently support Israel. Representative John Rutherford (R-Fla.) described ‍it ‍as an excellent decision, while ‍Representative Chip ⁢Roy (R-Texas) commended House Speaker Mike Johnson​ (R-La.) for putting Israel at the forefront and ⁤ensuring its ⁤funding.

OMB urged Congress to pass President Biden’s supplemental funding request, which includes assistance not⁤ only ‍for Israel but also for Ukraine, the Indo-Pacific region, and border security. The request also emphasizes the need for humanitarian ⁢aid in Gaza, controlled by Hamas, as well as‌ in Israel.

While Democrats advocate for combining assistance to ‍Israel with ‍aid to⁤ Ukraine,‌ Republicans argue that the two‌ issues should be addressed ‌separately. However, Senate‍ Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.)⁣ and ⁣Senate ‍Minority​ Leader⁤ Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have called for ​simultaneous passage of assistance for Ukraine and Israel.

The United States ⁢has a long history of providing assistance to Israel, dating ⁣back to ⁤before its independence in 1948. From 1971 to 2007, Israel received economic aid, and ⁢between ⁣1946 and 2023, the United States provided over $114.4 billion in military ⁢assistance, primarily for ⁣defense purposes, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service.

Currently, ‍Congress allocates $3.8 ⁣billion annually to Israel,​ with $3.3 billion dedicated to ​defense assistance.

‌ What are⁣ the concerns raised by Democrats regarding the allocation of funds to Israel in the supplemental funding bill?

Is-[120px]”>

Despite the opposition from Democrats, the ‌House passed the bill, recognizing the importance of supporting Israel during this critical time. The ongoing conflict between‌ Israel and the Hamas and Hezbollah terror​ groups has resulted in​ the loss⁢ of numerous innocent lives and significant damage to‍ infrastructure.

Israel, as a key ally ⁣of the United States, has received consistent support from the US in the form of military aid‌ and cooperation. This supplemental funding will provide additional resources to help Israel defend itself from the continuous attacks coming from these terror groups.

However, the allocation of⁣ the ⁣requested⁢ funds has⁣ generated controversy among Democrats.‌ They argue⁤ that the bill unfairly includes equal cuts ⁢to IRS ⁢funding, which they feel should be prioritized to provide essential services for American citizens.

Furthermore, Democrats are concerned about the lack ⁣of transparency in the allocation​ of funds to Israel. They argue that the bill ​does not provide adequate accountability measures to ensure that the funding ⁢is used ​for its intended purpose ​and does not perpetuate human rights⁣ violations or fuel further conflict in the region.

Despite ​these concerns, Republicans have emphasized the strategic⁢ importance of supporting Israel⁤ and ⁣maintaining a strong‍ alliance in the Middle​ East. They argue that providing additional funding to Israel will help ensure its ​security and stability, ultimately benefiting the United States and its‍ interests in the ​region.

The passage of this⁣ bill in the House is ‍a ⁢significant⁣ step ‌towards providing crucial support to Israel. However, it is expected to‌ face further challenges and discussions in the Senate, where ‌the ‌bill could undergo revisions or amendments before its⁢ final approval.

Overall, the decision to provide supplemental funding to Israel ‍during its ongoing conflict with the Hamas and Hezbollah terror groups has created a divisive atmosphere within the‍ House of Representatives. Democrats, while acknowledging the importance of supporting Israel, ‍strongly oppose the ⁤bill due to its equal cuts to IRS funding and concerns regarding transparency and accountability.

On the other hand, Republicans‍ maintain that supporting Israel is essential for‌ national security and stability in ⁢the Middle East. They emphasize ⁤the strategic importance of the alliance between the United‌ States and Israel and believe that additional funding ​will help protect Israeli citizens and promote peace in the region.

As the ⁤bill advances to the Senate, further debate and negotiations are ​expected as lawmakers work towards‌ a consensus on supporting Israel while addressing the concerns raised by Democrats. The final decision on‍ the‌ supplemental ‌funding bill will have far-reaching implications for both Israel and the relationship between the United States and the Middle East.


Read More From Original Article Here: House Advances Israel Aid Bill That Cuts IRS Funding

" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker