Georgetown University Places Staff Member on Leave for Anti-Semitic Posts
(Canary Mission)
Georgetown University has taken action against a recently hired staff member after discovering her disturbing anti-Semitic social media posts.
Aneesa Johnson, who was hired by Georgetown’s School of Foreign Service to be the main contact for master’s students regarding academic matters, has a troubling history of anti-Semitic activity and statements dating back to 2015.
According to posts shared by Canary Mission, an organization that monitors online anti-Semitism, Johnson tweeted in July 2015 expressing a “deep-seated hate for Zio bitches,” using derogatory language to refer to Zionists.
She also posted a picture of an Orthodox Jewish boy with the caption “When the world hates you because you’re a thief and grew up looking like a shaytan [devil] #GrowingUpIsraeli.”
Johnson’s LinkedIn profile reveals that she previously worked as a school counselor for Fairfax County Public Schools after completing her master’s in counseling at Johns Hopkins.
Furthermore, she has actively participated in various anti-Israel initiatives since her time as a student at Northwestern University in 2015. She was involved in a Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions campaign aimed at harming Israel’s economy. Additionally, she served as the events coordinator for the university’s chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine, a group with ties to Islamic terrorists.
In 2021, she cohosted a podcast where she expressed the belief that ”every American” should feel guilty for the United States’ support of Israel.
In response to these revelations, Georgetown University has issued a statement announcing Johnson’s immediate administrative leave. The university claims it was unaware of her social media posts at the time of her hiring.
Unfortunately, this incident is not isolated, as other universities have also faced criticism for employing individuals with anti-Semitic views. Following the Hamas terror attacks on Israel on October 7, a professor at George Washington University shared posts referring to the terrorists as “martyrs” and endorsing their “armed resistance.” Similarly, a Cornell professor was placed on leave after describing the attacks, which claimed the lives of over 1,400 Israelis, as “energizing” and ”exhilarating.”
How has Georgetown University responded to Aneesa Johnson’s anti-Semitic behavior on social media?
According to an investigation conducted by Canary Mission, an organization that exposes individuals and organizations promoting hatred and anti-Semitism, Aneesa Johnson has been actively engaging in anti-Semitic behavior on social media platforms. The posts in question include derogatory comments about Jewish people, Holocaust denial, and conspiracy theories.
Georgetown University, known for its commitment to inclusivity and diversity, took swift action upon learning about Johnson’s disturbing social media history. The university immediately placed her on administrative leave pending further investigation into her conduct.
It is disheartening to see such vile and hateful rhetoric coming from someone who was entrusted with the responsibility of supporting and guiding students at Georgetown University. The university must prioritize the safety and well-being of all its students, faculty, and staff, and take necessary measures to root out any form of discrimination or prejudice.
Anti-Semitism is a deeply rooted problem that continues to plague societies around the world. It is a form of prejudice and intolerance that has led to unspeakable atrocities throughout history, including the Holocaust. As a respected institution of higher education, Georgetown University must play a key role in educating its community about the dangers of anti-Semitism and promoting acceptance and understanding among its members.
By taking action against Aneesa Johnson, Georgetown University has sent a clear message that it will not tolerate hate speech or discriminatory behavior in any form. This incident should serve as a reminder to all educational institutions to thoroughly vet their employees and ensure they uphold the values they stand for.
In addition to addressing this specific incident, Georgetown University should also consider implementing stricter guidelines and policies regarding social media use and conduct for its staff members. Developing comprehensive training programs that educate employees about the impact of their online presence and the importance of fostering an inclusive and respectful environment is crucial.
Furthermore, it is essential for universities to foster an environment where open dialogue and discussion can take place, while also ensuring that hateful and discriminatory views are not given a platform. This balance can be achieved through the promotion of diversity and inclusivity, as well as actively engaging in initiatives that encourage understanding and tolerance.
Georgetown University’s response to the discovery of Aneesa Johnson’s anti-Semitic posts serves as a commendable example of swift and decisive action against hate speech and discrimination. It is a step in the right direction, but there is still much work to be done to address the underlying issues of intolerance and prejudice that persist in our society.
It is crucial for educational institutions and communities at large to actively combat and condemn anti-Semitism in all its forms. Only by working together can we hope to create a world that is free from hate, discrimination, and bigotry.
Now loading...