The epoch times

US retaliates against Netherlands’ unfair flight restrictions.

The U.S. ‍Department of Transportation Approves Complaints Against Netherlands’ Flight Cap Measures

The U.S. ⁣Department of Transportation (DOT) has given its⁢ approval to complaints filed⁢ against ⁢the⁤ Netherlands’ proposed flight cap ⁣measures. These​ measures would⁤ significantly reduce the number of flight slots ⁣available to U.S.-based airline⁤ companies at the ‍Amsterdam Airport⁤ Schiphol (AMS).

On‍ November 3, the DOT ‍approved complaints from industry group Airlines for ‌America ⁢(A4A) and JetBlue airlines.⁣ Both parties argued that​ the Netherlands’ plan to cut down ⁣flights ‍to AMS would⁤ harm ‌American carriers and violate several agreements. The Dutch government intends to implement noise ‍reduction measures at AMS starting next year, which ⁢includes reducing flight slots ​available ⁢to international airlines.

A4A points out that these measures will have⁣ a negative impact on American carriers, resulting in ‌the permanent loss of ‌historic slot rights held by U.S. carriers at AMS. It would also prevent new U.S. carriers from entering ⁢the Amsterdam flight ⁢market.

The DOT stated that the capacity ⁤reduction ​measures being undertaken at AMS are unjustifiable ⁤and⁢ unreasonable, and they violate the U.S.–EU ​Air Transport Agreement. ‌The Netherlands’ ⁣failure to follow the Balanced Approach, as required by the International Civil Aviation⁤ Organization, is the reason for this violation.

The Balanced Approach to Aircraft Noise ‌Management mandates the evaluation of all available options to identify the most ⁣cost-effective measures to mitigate noise problems. The Netherlands’‌ plan ‌does not align with this requirement.

JetBlue, in its ⁣complaint, highlighted that ‌the U.S.–EU‌ Air Transport Agreement⁢ mandates ​adherence to‌ the Balanced Approach principle.⁣ The DOT order stated ⁢that noise-based operating​ restrictions should only be imposed⁤ as a‌ last resort.

Related ⁢Stories

The DOT urged ⁤the Dutch‍ government‍ to suspend the implementation of phase 1 of the noise reduction plan​ in August. It also warned that implementing phase 1 ​without following the Balanced ⁤Approach would violate the U.S.–EU⁣ Air‌ Transport Agreement.

However, the Dutch government has not provided any convincing argument to support the theory ‌that its plan​ is in compliance with​ the U.S.–EU ​Agreement, according‌ to the‍ DOT.

The⁤ Dutch government has yet⁢ to suspend or delay its efforts to implement the⁤ plan, ⁤despite these concerns.

In contrast, the Dutch government published ⁣a document ⁣on⁣ September ⁤28, indicating a‌ reduction in ⁢flight slot capacity at AMS for ​the summer 2024 traffic season. The DOT ⁣expressed concerns about the second ​phase of ⁢the plan, ⁤which would further decrease annual flight slots to Amsterdam.

The DOT finds that‌ the implementation of the ‌Netherlands’ Phase 1⁤ noise reduction plan ⁢at ⁤AMS is unjustifiable and⁤ unreasonable. It constitutes a discriminatory ⁢and anticompetitive practice, restricting access to the U.S.–Amsterdam market for air carriers.

JetBlue’s⁤ Imminent Threat

JetBlue, despite joining the A4A complaint, ⁢filed ​a separate complaint​ due to the threat of being expelled from⁤ Amsterdam ⁤Airport Schiphol. ⁣The airline faces the​ possibility of losing access to AMS after the Winter 2023/2024 scheduling season.

JetBlue argues that if Phase⁢ 1 is implemented as planned, there will be no slots available⁣ for ⁢its service‍ during the Summer 2024 season. The airline claims⁤ that noise reduction measures block future access ⁣to AMS for new ⁢U.S.‍ carriers that are not part of an “immunized⁢ joint venture.”

JetBlue has​ requested the DOT to take countermeasures to ensure compliance with the U.S.–EU Air Transport Agreement. This includes reducing scheduled services of Dutch ​carriers to the United States.

DOT Countermeasures

In response to the Netherlands government’s stance, the DOT has asked three Dutch carriers—KLM, Martinair, and TUI Airlines Nederlands—to submit​ their service schedules to and from the⁤ United States.

The‌ DOT has‌ deferred a⁤ decision on further countermeasures for ⁤now. It ‌plans to engage with the Netherlands​ government and the ‍European Commission on November 13 to seek a resolution without the ​need ⁤for regulatory action.

However, if the talks ⁤fail to produce meaningful ⁣results, ‍the DOT is prepared to⁤ consider‍ appropriate further action.

KLM, in its response to the issue,⁢ stated ⁢that‌ it derives⁤ no‌ benefit from ⁣noise regulations at AMS and will be seriously ‌affected ‍if they become ⁣effective. ⁢The company has been actively campaigning against the proposed flight slot reductions.

KLM agrees with ⁢A4A and JetBlue’s conclusion that ‍the ⁢Dutch government’s noise‌ reduction measures are unlawful.

What international agreements and aviation standards are being violated by the Netherlands’ ⁤flight cap measures?

2 plan ⁤without ‌proper justifications and evaluation is ⁢inconsistent with the ​Airports Council International (ACI) World Slot Guidelines. These ​guidelines emphasize the need for transparent, non-discriminatory, and fair allocation of airport slots.

The DOT has emphasized‌ that it stands ready to engage ⁢in discussions with the Dutch ⁤government to ⁣find a mutually acceptable solution that adheres to the U.S.–EU‍ ​Air‌⁢ Transport Agreement and ‌international aviation standards. It also expressed its willingness to work with international ⁢partners,​ including the International Civil Aviation‌ Organization and the European Union, to address this‌ issue.

As the DOT approves the complaints against the⁤ Netherlands’ flight cap measures and raises concerns about the violation of international agreements, it is clear that it is committed to protecting the interests of U.S. carriers and ensuring fair‌ and ⁢equitable practices in ⁤international aviation. The outcome of ⁤further negotiations between the‍ U.S. and the Netherlands will determine the future ⁤of ‌flight slots ⁤at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and the level playing field for U.S.-based airlines.

Related Stories:

The aviation industry continues to face various challenges and‍ issues, both from ​operational and regulatory perspectives. As‌ stakeholders strive to find ⁤common ground⁣ and resolve conflicts, it is⁣ essential to prioritize the safety and well-being of passengers, while also ensuring fair and equitable practices for all airlines involved.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker