Report: ProPublica, funded by leftists, disproportionately targets conservatives over Democrats, 23 times more frequently.
ProPublica Exposed as Democrat Propaganda Machine
Despite its attempts to cast itself as an objective investigative news operation, ProPublica is actually a Democrat propaganda mill bankrolled by leftist mega-donors, a new report found.
Published by Restoration of America (ROA), the analysis uncovers how the investigative nonprofit spearheading the left’s assault against conservative Supreme Court justices acts as a PR operation for the Democrat Party. After reviewing more than 700 ProPublica articles published between January 2022 and September 2023, Restoration News discovered that the outlet is “23 times more likely to attack conservatives than the Left.”
Political Bias and Donor Influence
- Of the 716 articles reviewed, 242 were politically slanted, with a large disparity between anti-liberal and anti-leftist pieces.
- In total, 232 were anti-conservative and 10 were anti-left.
These numbers aren’t surprising when considering the political preferences of ProPublica’s staff, many of whom ROA discovered are registered Democrats. Of the more than half of staffers whose political affiliation could be determined (35 of 65), 27 were identified as Democrats while only three could be classified as Republicans.
When it’s not giving softball interviews to President Biden, ProPublica is busy leading Democrats’ smear campaign against Supreme Court justices who dare to uphold the U.S. Constitution. Throughout the past year, ProPublica has published numerous hit pieces against Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito attempting to make it appear as if the high court’s most conservative justices committed ethics violations while serving on the bench (they didn’t). Other left-wing outlets have joined ProPublica in this endeavor, with Politico publishing a hit job targeting Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Dark-Money Donors and Their Influence
- ProPublica’s biggest donor is The Sandler Foundation, which has given nearly $50 million since 2010.
- The Sandler Foundation has also given $7.5 million to the Campaign Legal Center (CLC) and millions to the Foundation to Promote Open Society, both left-wing organizations.
- The Marisla Foundation, another prominent donor, has given more than $2 million to ProPublica and roughly $1 million to the Center for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a group connected to a partisan Super PAC.
So how does this interconnected web of dark-money donors and their leftist agenda affect ProPublica’s “reporting” on the Supreme Court? As ROA documents, ProPublica’s hit pieces on conservative justices have often cited officials from several of the aforementioned groups.
In addition to attacking conservative Supreme Court justices, ProPublica has also regularly targeted former President Donald Trump and parents concerned about sexually explicit material, critical race theory, and so-called “diversity, equity, and inclusion” programs in their children’s schools.
In order to maintain journalistic integrity and objectivity, should ProPublica disclose its donor list and potential conflicts of interest that could potentially impact their reporting on Brett Kavanaugh
Lica-report-targets-brett-kavanaugh/” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>Brett Kavanaugh, using distorted and biased information to fuel their attacks.
A Weaponized Nonprofit
ROA’s analysis also highlights the extensive network of leftist donors that fund ProPublica’s operations. According to the report, major contributors include billionaire philanthropists George Soros and Pierre Omidyar, as well as the Open Society Foundations and other progressive organizations.
This financial backing not only allows ProPublica to operate on a massive scale but also raises questions about its independence and impartiality. With such influential and partisan donors, it becomes clear that ProPublica has become nothing more than a tool for promoting the Democrats’ agenda.
Further evidence of ProPublica’s bias can be seen in its selective reporting and cherry-picking of facts. The analysis by ROA found instances where the organization ignored important details or omitted crucial information in order to support their preferred narrative. This manipulation of facts is a clear sign of its partisan agenda and should raise serious concerns about the credibility of their reporting.
As a nonprofit organization, ProPublica should be held to the highest standards of journalistic integrity and objectivity. However, their consistent attacks on conservative individuals and their alignment with Democratic interests demonstrate a clear lack of impartiality.
A Call for Transparency and Accountability
In light of these findings, it is crucial for the public to be aware of ProPublica’s true nature and the motivations behind its reporting. Transparency and accountability are essential in a functioning democracy, and media organizations have a responsibility to uphold these principles.
Furthermore, it is important for ProPublica to disclose its donor list and provide transparency regarding any potential conflicts of interest. The public has a right to know who is funding the organization and whether these financial ties impact their reporting.
Ultimately, it is up to the readers to be discerning and critical of the information they consume. With a media landscape that is increasingly polarized and politically biased, it is essential to seek out multiple perspectives and verify the accuracy of the information presented.
ProPublica’s exposed bias and partisan agenda are a disservice to journalism and a threat to the democratic process. It is imperative that the public remains vigilant and holds media organizations accountable for their actions. Only through a commitment to truth, fairness, and objectivity can we ensure an informed electorate and a healthy democracy.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
