Last Time Democrats Took GOP Presidential Nominee Off the Ballot Was 1860
Last Time Democrats Took GOP Presidential Nominee Off the Ballot Was 1860
The Democrats and their allies are making a concerted effort to remove former President Donald Trump’s name from state ballots in key swing states for the 2024 election. This tactic is reminiscent of the presidential election of 1860, when the Democrats ensured that Republican nominee Abraham Lincoln’s name did not appear on most Southern states’ ballots. Despite this, Lincoln still managed to win the election with a majority of the popular vote. This historical example highlights the lengths to which Democrats were willing to go to prevent a candidate they disagreed with from being considered by voters.
Ironically, the Democrats are now attempting to use a post-Civil War amendment, which no Democrats voted for in Congress, to achieve their goal. They are relying on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits individuals who engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States from holding federal office. Democrats and NeverTrump Republicans are pursuing legal challenges in state courts, arguing that Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021, constitute insurrection or rebellion. They are basing their case on the conduct of some protesters who became violent during the Capitol incursion.
However, it is questionable whether Trump’s actions can be classified as insurrection, as he explicitly called for a peaceful and patriotic demonstration. Furthermore, it is worth noting that Democrats themselves have questioned the outcome of several presidential elections won by Republicans. For example, Hillary Clinton, the 2016 Democratic nominee, suggested that the race was “stolen” from her. This raises the question of whether Clinton should be considered an insurrectionist.
Following the 2020 election, Texas and other states filed lawsuits against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin, alleging that these states did not follow their own election laws, which were designed to ensure the integrity of the vote. The Supreme Court ruled that Texas did not have standing to sue other states regarding their election procedures, without considering the other legal merits of the case. This ruling, along with other challenges, has contributed to a lack of confidence in the integrity of the U.S. electoral system among a significant portion of the population.
Although Trump is not yet the official Republican nominee for 2024, he is currently the frontrunner in polls. However, left-wing groups are actively working to have his name removed from state primary ballots. Their argument is that Trump’s presence on the ballot might give him an advantage in becoming the GOP nominee. The goal of these groups is ultimately to have Trump removed from all state ballots.
Legal experts believe that these cases will likely be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court. However, there are concerns that state courts, particularly those in swing states with Democratic governors and attorneys general, may rule against Trump. In such a scenario, it would be up to the Supreme Court to intervene and make a final decision.
The Democrats’ strategy of using lawfare to target the leading GOP candidate must be strongly opposed in the courts and rejected by voters in the 2024 election. The future of self-government in America depends on it.
How does the Democrats’ strategy of excluding their opponent from the race reflect on their confidence in their own candidate and the trust voters place in the electoral process
Ceful protest and condemned violence. While some individuals at the Capitol did engage in unlawful behavior, there is no evidence to suggest that Trump directly incited or encouraged their actions. The Democrats’ interpretation of the 14th Amendment seems to be a stretch, as it was intended to bar former Confederate officials from holding office, not to target political opponents for their rhetoric or perceived role in civil unrest.
Furthermore, the Democrats’ efforts to remove Trump’s name from state ballots raise concerns about the integrity of the democratic process. By attempting to limit the choices available to voters, they are undermining the principles of free and fair elections. Every eligible candidate should have the opportunity to present their platform to the voters and let them decide who is best suited for the presidency.
The Democrats’ strategy also reflects a lack of confidence in their own candidate’s ability to win in a fair and open competition. Rather than engaging in substantive discussions about policy and building a strong campaign, they are resorting to tactics aimed at excluding their opponent from the race. This approach not only weakens the democratic system but also undermines the trust that voters place in the electoral process.
It is important to note that attempts to remove a candidate from the ballot have rarely been successful in American history. The precedent set by the Democrats in 1860 did not prevent Lincoln from winning the election, and it is unlikely that similar efforts against Trump will succeed. Ultimately, it will be up to the courts to determine the legality of these challenges and whether they violate the constitutional rights of both Trump and his supporters.
In a democracy, it is crucial to respect the rights of all citizens to participate in the political process and freely choose their representatives. Attempting to exclude a candidate from the ballot sets a dangerous precedent that undermines the core principles of democracy. The actions of the Democrats and their allies in seeking to remove Trump’s name from state ballots for the 2024 election should be scrutinized and condemned for their disregard of democratic norms and the will of the voters.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...