Support for All-Year Daylight Savings Time Grows, But Some Experts Say It’s a Terrible Idea
Support for All-Year Daylight Savings Time Grows, But Some Experts Say It’s a Terrible Idea
Many Americans are fed up with the biannual practice of changing their clocks back and forth. They want to make daylight savings time permanent, despite some experts’ concerns.
Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida has been leading the charge to eliminate this unnecessary tradition. He reintroduced the Sunshine Protection Act in March to make DST permanent.
A bipartisan group of senators co-sponsored the bill, showing overwhelming support.
Making Daylight Saving Time permanent has support from 22 states. Let’s get this done and #LocktheClock pic.twitter.com/Fks7B6yzZh
— Senator Marco Rubio (@SenMarcoRubio) November 3, 2023
Rubio highlighted that the Senate unanimously passed the Sunshine Protection Act last year, and 22 states also support the bill.
In 2022, the Senate unanimously passed my bill to Lock the Clock on Daylight Saving Time.
Making DST permanent is more popular than ever with 22 states supporting it.
Congress should pass my bill and make this a law once and for all. pic.twitter.com/cjpENFtQce
— Senator Marco Rubio (@SenMarcoRubio) November 3, 2023
In a nutshell, permanent DST would mean more daylight during the day but earlier darkness in the evening.
Supporters argue that longer daylight hours promote safer driving, boost the economy with after-work shopping, and encourage a healthier lifestyle with more outdoor activities, according to WFSB.
However, Kenneth Wright, a professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder, disagrees. He believes sticking with standard time, not daylight saving time, is the better option.
The practice of daylight savings time was initially implemented during World War I to save energy. However, research has shown that it didn’t save much energy and even increased fuel usage, as reported by CU Boulder Today.
Changing the clocks twice a year is widely considered unhealthy and dangerous. It is associated with mood disturbances, hospital admissions, and increased risk of heart attacks and strokes, according to the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.
Should there be year-round daylight savings time?
According to historical data, support for permanent daylight savings time has fluctuated. While initially favored, support dropped after exposure to dark mornings. Research showed that it didn’t save much energy and even increased fuel usage.
Whether you’re for or against permanent daylight savings time, the consensus is that changing the clocks twice a year is unhealthy and dangerous. It is associated with mood disturbances, hospital admissions, and increased risk of heart attacks and strokes.
The post Support for All-Year Daylight Savings Time Grows, But Some Experts Say It’s a Terrible Idea appeared first on The Western Journal.
What is the Sunshine Protection Act and why does Senator Marco Rubio support it?
Ding to the Western Journal, there is growing support among Americans for the adoption of year-round daylight savings time. This sentiment is being echoed by Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, who has been advocating for the implementation of permanent daylight savings time through the reintroduction of the Sunshine Protection Act.
The bipartisan support for this bill is evident, with several senators co-sponsoring it. Additionally, Rubio emphasizes that the Senate unanimously passed the Sunshine Protection Act last year, demonstrating a high level of consensus on the issue. Furthermore, 22 states have also expressed their support for the bill.
Proponents of year-round daylight savings time argue that it would have numerous benefits. Longer daylight hours would ensure safer driving conditions and would also provide more opportunities for after-work shopping, thus boosting the economy. Additionally, it is believed that increased exposure to daylight would encourage a healthier lifestyle, with more opportunities for outdoor activities.
However, some experts have raised concerns about making daylight savings time permanent. Kenneth Wright, a professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder, believes that sticking with standard time would be a better option. He points to research that indicates that daylight savings time did not save much energy and actually led to increased fuel usage.
Moreover, changing the clocks twice a year has been associated with negative health effects. It is believed to contribute to mood disturbances, increased hospital admissions, and a higher risk of heart attacks and strokes, according to the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.
In conclusion, the debate around year-round daylight savings time continues to gain traction in the United States. While there is growing support for the idea, some experts caution against its implementation citing concerns about energy usage and negative health effects. As discussions and deliberations continue, it remains to be seen whether permanent daylight savings time will become a reality in the future.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...