Washington Examiner

Republican debate: Only one thing matters after GOP brawl in Miami

After ‌the third ‍Republican ⁤presidential debate, only one ​question matters.

Did ​anything change?

BIDEN​ CAMPAIGN TAKES VICTORY LAP ON DEMOCRATIC WINS AFTER ⁤POOR POLLING

All five candidates on the stage in Miami needed to shake up something in the fundamentals of the⁣ race.

They‌ are all ​badly trailing ⁤former ⁢President ⁣Donald Trump, ‌who is hovering ‌around 60% in the national polling averages. They are⁤ also⁤ far behind him ⁢in the early states,⁤ including⁢ Iowa, which votes in January.

The theory ⁤has been that it will take Republican primary voters a ‌while to pay serious attention to⁢ the ‍race. But soon it will ‌be Thanksgiving, Christmas, ⁤and New⁢ Year’s.

As Ronald Reagan might ask,⁣ “If not now, ‍when?”

Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) ⁢was solid⁢ and disciplined, mostly staying above the fray but landing his occasional ​jabs against the losing⁣ culture that has afflicted the party since Trump — who’s become a different guy ​since 2016! ⁢— lost his​ mojo.

Former‌ U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley was forceful in her defense ⁣of Israel. The only thing that makes ‌her madder ​than Iran is ⁤entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, who went after her footwear and foreign policy throughout the evening.

Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) told ‍stories about ⁣his life and tried to stay within the confines of ⁤the debate’s time limits.‍ But he was the least ambiguous about his preference ‌for‌ a federal‌ abortion policy, taking up ​the⁣ space to⁢ the right of ⁣Trump ​and Haley on an issue that has ‌vexed Republicans at​ the ballot box since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie​ is the tough-talking guy ⁣who says⁢ he has actually done everything ‌the​ other candidates ⁤are talking about, tossing truth bombs about Trump’s⁣ legal ⁤woes as if he just reinvaded Iraq.

But with few exceptions, all of ‍these things have been done before. None⁢ of them seem to have made much of an impact on the race.

The snap polls will‌ probably⁤ look‍ good​ for DeSantis and​ Haley. Republican respondents will also dutifully‍ reply that they were disappointed that Trump was a no-show yet again.

But will anything ⁢be different 72 hours later?

Haley has seen ⁤some ⁢upward movement in the polls since the debates started, though not enough ‌to bypass DeSantis ‌convincingly, much less overtake Trump.

DeSantis has yet ​to really dominate a debate like the front-runner⁤ onstage, but it is ‌hard to say any of these events have​ really hurt him either.

Still, Trump continues to‌ have the top tier ⁢all to himself,⁢ and the hour is getting ​late.

The main thing the contestants have‍ to hope has changed⁤ is the interest level in a substantive debate.

None of them‍ stooped to⁣ Trump’s level with personal insults, though Ramaswamy’s ‍digs at‍ Haley⁣ on war and wardrobe‌ may have ⁣worn as well as ill-fitting high heels and prompted the ex-ambassador‌ to mutter that he was “scum.”

The‌ NBC moderators did a better job of maintaining control and decorum than⁢ was seen at previous debates,‌ even if they ‌weren’t Tucker Carlson, Joe Rogan, or Greg Gutfeld. ‌The smaller field⁣ also helped.

If Republican voters, reeling from the whiplash⁢ of seeing ⁤President ‌Joe‍ Biden’s dismal poll numbers and then their own party’s‌ disappointing off-year election‌ results, were looking for change, maybe they found⁤ something they liked.

So far, however, ‌the debates have mainly served to move ⁤a⁣ second⁤ candidate into double digits and spark a Vivek ‌boomlet that seems to have already faded.

DeSantis ‌made the case he was a Trump who would actually keep his promises. But hasn’t he done so ⁣before? The taxing remittances to make​ Mexico​ really pay for the border wall was a nice ⁣touch.

Haley has argued the ‌world ​is on fire and the‌ president who⁢ sent her to the United Nations is no longer the right⁢ man to put it out. She has said such ⁤things ​before, but perhaps the Oct. 7⁢ Hamas attack⁣ on Israel,⁣ followed by weeks of antisemitic incidents on⁤ college ⁣campuses here at home, raises ⁤the stakes.

One thing is for certain: The ⁤status quo benefits‍ Trump because‍ he ‍is⁣ the leader​ of the race.

In fact, the debates up to this point have ⁣failed to ‌establish a race for anything but second place.

CLICK HERE TO ⁤READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Every candidate at this debate is hoping that either the base gets⁤ tired of Trump or the judges in one of his trials do.

There’s still ⁢time before Iowa, but not much.

With time running ​out and the clock ticking, will any‌ of the candidates ⁣be able to make a breakthrough and significantly ​change the dynamics of the race

Tting late ⁣for the other candidates to make ⁣a significant breakthrough. Despite their efforts on the debate stage, the question remains: did anything change?

It is no secret‌ that all ⁢five candidates on the ‍stage in Miami needed a ‌game-changing moment. They​ are all trailing behind ⁢former President Donald Trump, who maintains a strong lead ‍in the national ⁣polling averages.​ Additionally, they are far behind him⁤ in the early states, including Iowa, which will hold its primary elections in ⁢January.

There has been a belief that Republican primary voters will ​take time to seriously consider their options. However, with Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year’s approaching, time is ⁢running out. As Ronald Reagan once asked, “If not now, when?”

During the debate, Governor Ron DeSantis (R-FL) demonstrated solid and disciplined performance. He mostly stayed above the fray but took occasional jabs at the losing culture that has plagued the ⁤party since Trump’s post-2016 transformation. Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley passionately defended Israel, displaying her unwavering stance on the ‌matter. She had to face ⁢criticism from entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, who questioned her foreign policy decisions.

Senator Tim Scott ⁣(R-SC) shared personal stories about his life and adhered to ​the debate’s time ​limits. He⁣ made it clear that he supports​ a federal abortion policy, taking a stance to‌ the right of Trump and Haley on this contentious issue that has long ‌divided Republicans.

Former ​New Jersey Governor⁢ Chris Christie took on the role of the‍ tough-talking candidate, boasting‌ about his achievements and shedding light​ on Trump’s legal woes with a matter-of-fact attitude.

Despite these standout ⁤performances, it appears that most of what⁢ was said and done has already been seen before. Nothing seems to have significantly impacted the race.

Snap polls conducted immediately after the​ debate may ‍favor DeSantis and Haley. Republicans will ⁤likely express disappointment at Trump’s absence once ‌again. However, the question remains:‍ will ⁣anything be‌ different ‌72 hours later?

Haley has seen​ some upward movement in the polls since ​the debates began, but not ‌enough to convincingly⁣ surpass DeSantis, let alone‌ topple⁤ Trump. DeSantis, although yet to completely dominate a debate like the front-runner on​ stage, has ⁢managed to maintain his position​ without sustaining any significant damage.

Nevertheless, Trump ​continues ‍to dominate the top tier, with the other candidates struggling to⁤ catch up. The clock is ticking, and it is becoming increasingly difficult for them to ​make a breakthrough. The question of whether anything has truly changed after ‍the third Republican presidential debate‍ remains unanswered.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker