The federalist

Senate Democrats Back Off On Supreme Court Subpoenas After GOP Calls Bluff

Democrats’ Efforts to Undermine the​ Supreme Court Face Setback

Democrats’ quest to undermine the Supreme⁢ Court slowed on Thursday when the ‍Senate Judiciary Committee tabled a⁢ vote to subpoena private ⁣citizens Harlan Crow and ‍Leonard‌ Leo over their friendships with Justices Clarence Thomas and⁣ Samuel Alito.

Chairman Dick Durbin ⁤said he backed off the vote because the committee “ran out of time” to evaluate an avalanche of amendments that he⁤ said Democrats did not​ know​ about until the night​ before the committee ⁢meeting.

Ranking Member Lindsey⁢ Graham, after calling the conduct of the​ Democrat-led ​committee⁤ “a complete sh-t show,”⁢ warned ​Durbin that Republicans filed “a bunch of amendments” to hamper Democrats’ intimidation campaign.

The⁢ 88 amendments aim ​to ⁣redirect the committee’s focus from executing Democrats’ public vendetta against Republican-nominated​ justices, which Senate Majority⁢ Leader ​Chuck Schumer promised in⁣ 2020,⁤ to⁣ legitimate oversight that is currently blocked by the Senate’s Democrat majority.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn confirmed ⁣to the ​committee that‌ she ‍filed several of the amendments including one to subpoena Justice Sotomayor’s staff over her book-selling scandal.

Blackburn noted that “since we’re ⁢in the business ‌of ⁣issuing‍ subpoenas,” Republicans like her plan to subpoena Jeffrey Epstein’s estate over his flight logs, Department of Health⁤ and Human Services ‍Secretary Xavier Becerra to⁤ explain how⁢ he lost track of 85,000 migrant children, the Department of Justice over its decision to⁢ terminate a⁤ program aimed at rooting⁢ out ⁢Chinese spies in the U.S., Special Counsel⁤ Robert Mueller’s staff over his targeting of former​ President‌ Donald ‍Trump, and the DOJ and⁤ Federal Trade⁤ Commission over their investigation of Elon Musk.

“Our Supreme Court justices, especially Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, they have been ‍subjected to threats on their ⁢lives.⁢ Their families have​ been subjected to ⁤threats on their lives. And yet, ‌this is what ‌you and Senator Whitehouse are choosing to focus on, is a discrediting⁣ of the⁢ court,”⁣ Blackburn⁣ said.‌ “We know‌ what this is about. We should be talking about protections for the​ court.”


When ⁤Durbin adjourned the ​committee, he vowed⁤ to “absolutely” revive the subpoena fight but did not specify when he plans to do it.

Thomas and Alito’s friendships with wealthy men are not illegal, nor​ did their so-called “undisclosed lavish gifts and‍ trips” ⁤amount to any⁢ of‌ the ethics violations outlined in ⁢the Supreme⁤ Court’s ​code​ of conduct at the time they were received. Yet, Durbin repeatedly claimed that‍ the⁤ Supreme Court “is⁣ in an ‌ethical crisis of its ⁢own making.”

The leftist senators and their⁢ dark-money allies leading ⁤the ⁤charge against Thomas and Alito ⁤claim the Supreme Court has a “history of ethical challenges” that require congressionally mandated, compulsory regulation.⁤ Their efforts ‍are aided by a litany of coordinated hit pieces on Thomas, Alito, and Justice ⁣Neil Gorsuch by ProPublica (which attacks conservatives 23 times more often than Democrats), ‌Politico, and other corporate media outlets.

Durbin claimed during Thursday’s meeting that “the committee has not​ engaged in a vendetta against conservatives” and “is not seeking the subpoena⁣ authorization⁤ to score political points.”

What he did not mention is that Democrats like he and Sheldon ​Whitehouse ‍only became interested in the “ethics” of SCOTUS because it was politically and personally strategic‍ for their party to‍ target ⁤the conservative-controlled court. He also did not ⁣acknowledge that ⁤Democrat-nominated justices have a whole⁣ host of ⁢decades-old violations that are worth probing but have⁣ been ​readily ignored by the senators⁤ and the media.

During a committee hearing on the subpoenas last​ week, Republicans called out Democrats’ partisan ⁣scheming ‍for being a transparent effort to undermine and delegitimize the Supreme Court.

Sen. Chuck Grassley warned that the ⁢Supreme Court “is an independent branch of government NOT a political punching bag.”

Sen. Tom Cotton, similarly, accused ⁢Democrats of targeting the court⁤ simply “because you don’t like ⁢the way they rule.”


Sen. Ted Cruz diagnosed the smear campaign as a pet project of “left-wing billionaires” who endorse ⁤a “full on assault ⁢on our‍ Constitution.”

“Democrats ⁤hate our system of separation of⁢ powers,⁣ and they are willing to burn ⁣down the Supreme Court to accomplish their political goals,” Cruz said.


What is⁤ the motive‌ behind the‌ Democrats’ sudden concern for ethics and transparency when it conveniently aligns⁣ with their ⁤political agenda?

Ally advantageous for ⁢them to do⁢ so. Their sudden concern for ⁤ethics conveniently coincided with ⁤the appointment of conservative justices to the Supreme Court, which⁣ upset their liberal agenda.

The Democrats’ efforts to undermine the ⁢Supreme ‍Court are part of a larger strategy to‍ consolidate their power and⁢ push through their agenda, regardless of what the American people want or what the Constitution allows. They ‌are using‍ any means necessary to achieve their goals, including weaponizing the committee process ⁣to intimidate and‌ harass private citizens who have⁣ connections to conservative justices.

The⁢ decision to table the vote to subpoena Harlan Crow and Leonard Leo⁤ is⁣ a small setback for the Democrats, ‌but it does not mean that their efforts are over. Chairman Durbin has made it clear that he plans to revive the subpoena ⁢fight‍ in ​the future.

It is important to ⁢understand the real motive ‌behind the ​Democrats’ actions. They ⁢claim to be concerned ⁢about ethics and transparency, but their true goal‍ is to discredit and delegitimize the Supreme Court in order ⁤to‍ advance their own political agenda. They are⁣ willing to trample ​on the rights⁢ and reputations of innocent individuals​ to achieve ⁣their goals.

The‍ Republican amendments filed‌ by⁢ Senator Marsha Blackburn and others ⁢seek to‌ redirect ‌the committee’s focus towards ‌legitimate oversight⁤ and away from ​the Democrats’ partisan vendetta. These amendments⁤ highlight the hypocrisy of the ​Democrats and ​their selective ⁣outrage. If they are truly concerned about ethics and transparency, they ​should ⁢be ⁣willing to‌ investigate a wide range of issues, not just those that conveniently align with their political ‌agenda.

The attacks on conservative justices and the Supreme Court as a ⁢whole are unwarranted and dangerous. Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett have dedicated their careers to upholding the Constitution ⁤and interpreting the law.‍ They deserve our‍ respect and support, not baseless⁢ accusations and attempts to ‌undermine their integrity.

The Democrats’ campaign against the Supreme Court is a direct threat to⁢ the independence of our judiciary ​and the​ rule of law. They are using their power ‌in Congress to intimidate⁣ and bully ‌private citizens, all in an effort to weaken the conservative ⁢majority on ⁤the Court.

We



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker