oann

House rejects amendment to end vehicle ‘kill switch’ mandate.


OAN’s Sam Valk
1:00 PM – Monday, November ‍13, 2023

19⁣ Republicans join all ⁣but two Democrats in killing an amendment to stop the Biden Administration from requiring cars built after 2026 to ⁣have a ⁢so-called “kill switch.” Here’s One ⁤America’s’ Sam Valk ‍with more.

⁤ Share this ‍post!

19 Republicans join all but two Democrats in rejecting ‍an amendment that would have prevented the Biden Administration from mandating a “kill switch” in cars manufactured after 2026.⁢ Watch the report by One America’s Sam Valk for more details.

Long-time New York House Democrat Brian​ Higgins⁤ plans to step down from congress before⁢ the end of ⁣his current​ term.

Tech CEO and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy takes a swipe at Nikki Haley as the Republican primary field narrows.

Join Rep.‌ Beth Van ⁢Duyne in discussing important issues.

President Biden’s‌ administration unveils‌ initiatives to allocate more⁣ wireless spectrum⁣ for advanced technology ⁢needs ​and the ‍growing demand for ‌wireless services.

Humane introduces​ a groundbreaking $699 ⁣device that brings cutting-edge ⁢artificial ⁤intelligence to⁣ your lapel.

Regulators and traders assess the ​impact of a ransomware ‍attack on the Industrial and ⁢Commercial Bank of China.

X has only ⁢2,294 content moderators to ensure compliance with EU ⁣online content regulations.

rnrn

What are the reasons​ cited by opponents of the amendment for voting against it and supporting the inclusion ⁤of a “kill ⁢switch” requirement?

S News Network (OAN) reporter Sam Valk reporting on‌ the recent development in Congress. On⁣ Monday, November 13, 2023, a significant event took place, where 19 Republicans‌ voted alongside all ⁢but two Democrats to defeat an amendment aimed at preventing the Biden Administration from mandating a “kill switch” in ⁤cars‍ manufactured after 2026.

The proposed amendment, if passed, would have ⁣prevented the implementation of a “kill switch” requirement for future cars. This contentious‍ issue has ignited debates among‌ lawmakers, industry experts, and the general public. The term “kill switch” refers to a⁣ mechanism that would ⁣allow authorities⁢ or car manufacturers to remotely ​disable a ‌vehicle in certain circumstances.

Supporters of the amendment argue that such a requirement could infringe upon people’s privacy rights and potentially lead to abuse. They fear that the introduction of a “kill switch” could allow for unauthorized‌ access or ⁣misuse, whether it ​be by‌ hackers or government agencies. Additionally, opponents⁢ argue that⁢ this measure would give the government ⁢excessive control over transportation and‌ individual mobility.

However, those who voted‍ against the amendment assert that⁤ a “kill switch”​ is a necessary safety precaution. They argue that such a mechanism could prove invaluable in situations involving car theft, unauthorized use, or emergencies. Proponents ‌of the measure claim​ that it could ​contribute to public safety, allowing authorities​ to disable a vehicle in the event of a high-speed chase‍ or terrorist threat.

The 19​ Republicans who voted against the amendment have faced criticism within their⁢ own party. Some conservatives argue ‌that this decision represents a betrayal ​of their commitment to⁣ limited⁣ government intervention and individual freedoms. Meanwhile, Democrats who supported the amendment view it as a necessary safeguard against potential abuses of power.

The defeat of this amendment marks a significant victory for the Biden Administration, which ​has been advocating for stricter regulations and measures to‌ combat ‍climate change. The requirement for a “kill switch” in vehicles built after 2026 is seen as one step towards a greener future and increased accountability in the transportation sector. However, concerns remain about potential privacy and security implications, as well as the potential for unintended consequences.

As ​this debate continues, it‌ is crucial‍ to consider the long-term consequences and strike a balance between public safety and⁣ individual rights. The ‍decision made on Monday highlights the complexities of ⁢governance and the clash of ideals ⁣within the political‌ landscape. Only‌ time will tell how the implementation of a “kill switch” requirement will unfold and whether⁤ it​ will achieve its ‍intended objectives without compromising people’s privacy or safety.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker