WaPo, New York Times Make Dumb Fake News Out Of Very Perfect, Very True Trump Quote
What I despise about the national media, more than anything else, is their unwavering talent for taking a genuinely captivating or even slightly intriguing story and transforming it into something foolish, deceitful — or even worse, something dull.
For instance, in two separate op-eds published in The New York Times and The Washington Post, they both used the same quote from a recent TV interview with Donald Trump and stripped it of its original and insightful meaning, solely to reinforce their tiresome “Democracy is at stake!” narratives.
Regarding the quote in question, Jamelle Bouie of the Times stated, “Trump plans to turn the Department of Justice against his political opponents, prosecuting his critics and rivals.” (Wow! A president prosecuting his critics and rivals? Never thought I’d witness such a day!)
Similarly, Catherine Rampell of the Post claimed that it was “horrifying” that Trump was threatening to use presidential power ”against political rivals in retaliation for their alleged persecution of him.”
Both Bouie and Rampell only used a portion of Trump’s remarks, but here’s more context:
Univision interviewer: ”You say they’ve (Democrats) weaponized the Justice Department, they’ve weaponized the FBI. Would you do the same if you’re reelected?”
Trump: “Well, he’s (Biden) unleashed something that everybody — we’ve all known about this for 100 years. We’ve watched other countries do it and in some cases effective and in other cases, the country’s overthrown or it’s been totally ineffective. … What they’ve done is they’ve released the genie out of the box, you understand that. They’ve done something that nobody thought would happen. … They have done something that allows the next party — I mean, if somebody — if I happen to be president, and I see somebody who’s doing well and beating me very badly, I say, ‘Go down and indict them,’ mostly that would be, you know, they would be out of business. They’d be out. They’d be out of the election.”
The complete answer is even more intriguing, but what Bouie and Rampell omitted is that Trump wasn’t making an unprovoked threat about his plans if he’s reelected. He was accurately describing the logical consequence of criminalizing political opposition. When the party in power falls out of favor, they become vulnerable in the same way.
That’s called payback, and undoubtedly Trump and his supporters desire it. However, let’s not overlook the details of how we arrived at this point. That’s the most captivating aspect of the story.
What was the point that E and Rampell missed in Trump’s quote about potential abuse of power by future presidents?
E and Rampell completely missed the point of Trump’s quote. In the interview, Trump was discussing the potential abuse of power by future presidents, saying, “If they do that, then I think everything’s on the table. I mean, that’s a very, very bad thing that they’re doing.” He was highlighting the dangers of using the Department of Justice for political purposes, regardless of the party in power.
Instead of recognizing this valid concern, the media twisted Trump’s words to fit their own biased agenda. By focusing on the idea of Trump targeting his “critics and rivals,” they ignored the larger issue at hand – the compromising of justice for political gain.
This kind of sensationalist reporting is not only misleading but also harmful to the public discourse. It hinders constructive conversations and perpetuates the division in our society. It is the responsibility of the media to provide accurate and unbiased information, allowing the readers to form their own opinions based on facts.
Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident. The media has a long history of spinning stories to fit their preferred narratives. Whether it is cherry-picking quotes, selectively omitting information, or using emotionally charged language, they often prioritize sensationalism over truth.
This pattern of sensationalism not only damages the credibility of the media but also erodes public trust. When the public perceives the media as biased, they become skeptical of all news sources, making it difficult to distinguish fact from opinion.
Furthermore, this sensationalist approach to reporting perpetuates a culture of negativity and divisiveness. By focusing on scandal and controversy, the media reinforces the idea that political differences are insurmountable and that dialogue is futile. This discourages meaningful engagement and fosters a sense of cynicism among the public.
In order to restore public trust and promote a healthy political climate, the media must prioritize objectivity and integrity in their reporting. They should strive to present all sides of a story, provide context, and avoid sensationalism. By doing so, they can contribute to a more informed and thoughtful society.
As consumers of media, it is our responsibility to be critical readers and seek out multiple sources of information. We should be aware of the media’s biases and question the narratives presented to us. By actively engaging with different perspectives, we can foster a more nuanced understanding of the complex issues we face.
The media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion and facilitating democratic discourse. It is essential that they uphold their responsibility to inform, educate, and foster meaningful dialogue. By avoiding sensationalism and prioritizing accuracy, the media can regain the trust and respect of the public, ensuring a more informed and democratic society.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...