Cruz and Ogles seek to block forced use of ‘preferred pronouns’ across federal agencies
EXCLUSIVE: Bill Introduced to Protect Honest Speech
Leading the Charge: Rep. Andy Ogles and Sen. Ted Cruz
Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) are spearheading a groundbreaking bill that aims to safeguard the freedom of speech by blocking federal agencies from enforcing the use of “preferred pronouns” for employees and contractors.
The bill, aptly named the Safeguarding Honest Speech Act, is a direct response to the Department of Health and Human Services’ recent “Gender Identity and Non-Discrimination Guidance,” which mandates the use of self-identified names and pronouns for all employees.
Protecting Individual Rights
Ogles and Cruz’s bill seeks to prevent the allocation of funds towards implementing rules that force employees or contractors to use pronouns that do not align with their biological sex or refer to them by names other than their legal ones.
“Imagine facing reprimand or even losing your job simply for not adhering to someone’s ‘preferred pronouns’,” Ogles passionately expressed. ”Sadly, this is the reality imposed by the Biden regime through their latest guidance. The radical Left is actively coercing speech, all in the name of a misguided woke agenda.”
“Preferred pronouns” are pronouns that individuals choose to reflect their own gender identity.
According to the Pew Research Center, 5.1% of adults over 30 and 1.6% of all adults identify as transgender or nonbinary, meaning they may use pronouns different from their assigned sex at birth.
However, Republicans at both the national and state levels have consistently introduced legislation aimed at limiting or prohibiting the usage of “preferred pronouns” on public documents and in the workplace. They argue that it promotes what they deem as “radical gender ideology.”
Defending Constitutional Rights
Sen. Cruz emphasized the bill’s constitutional significance, stating, “Forcing anyone to use pronouns that contradict a person’s biological sex is a clear violation of the First Amendment. As the Supreme Court has affirmed, no official, regardless of their position, can dictate what is considered orthodox in matters of opinion. The government has no authority to compel the use of pronouns that defy biological reality.”
The bill has garnered support from other representatives, including Reps. Lauren Boebert (R-CO), Eli Crane (R-AZ), Doug LaMalfa (R-CA), Andy Harris (R-MD), and Mary Miller (R-IL).
Click here to read more from The Washington Examiner.
How can the Safeguarding Honest Speech Act ensure workplace dignity and respect while still allowing for individual freedom in language use
Uz argue that this guidance infringes on individual rights and forces individuals to use language that goes against their personal beliefs and values. They believe that employees and contractors should have the right to use the pronouns and names that align with their own convictions, without fear of retribution or punishment.
The Safeguarding Honest Speech Act would prohibit federal agencies from taking disciplinary action against individuals who do not comply with preferred pronoun usage. It would also prevent agencies from withholding benefits, contracts, or funding based on an individual’s refusal to use such language.
The bill emphasizes the importance of protecting honest speech and respecting individual freedom. It highlights the fundamental right to free expression and the need to create an environment where individuals can freely express their beliefs without fear of discrimination or retribution.
Ensuring Workplace Dignity and Respect
While the bill acknowledges the importance of fostering a work environment that is inclusive and respectful of all individuals, it argues that the government should not mandate language use. Instead, it advocates for a voluntary approach, where individuals are free to use the language they feel comfortable with, while still maintaining a respectful and dignified workplace.
Furthermore, the bill argues that this type of mandate can be counterproductive and actually hinder progress towards promoting tolerance and understanding. By forcing individuals to use certain language, it can create resentment and misunderstanding, ultimately undermining the very goals that it seeks to achieve.
Ogles and Cruz believe that the protection of honest speech is vital to preserving our democratic principles and individual liberties. They argue that the government should not have the power to dictate speech and force individuals to choose between their beliefs and their livelihoods.
Building Support for the Bill
Initial reactions to the Safeguarding Honest Speech Act have been mixed. Supporters of the bill argue that it upholds the First Amendment rights of individuals and promotes a culture of free expression. They believe that it is a necessary step to push back against attempts to regulate language and control individual beliefs.
Opponents of the bill, however, argue that it is a threat to the progress made in creating a more inclusive society. They believe that using preferred pronouns is a way to show respect and understanding for the experiences of transgender and non-binary individuals, and that refusing to acknowledge their identity undermines their dignity and well-being.
As the bill gains traction in Congress, the debate surrounding the balance between free speech and the recognition of individual identities is likely to intensify. The Safeguarding Honest Speech Act raises important questions about the limits of government power and the importance of protecting individual liberties.
Ultimately, the bill aims to ensure that individuals are free to express their beliefs and convictions without fear of punishment or retribution. It seeks to protect honest speech and promote a culture of respect and understanding, while still preserving individual freedoms and rights.
A Step Towards Ensuring Freedom
The Safeguarding Honest Speech Act represents a crucial step in the ongoing effort to safeguard the freedom of speech and protect individual liberties.
It stands as a rebuke to government overreach and a commitment to upholding the principles upon which our nation was founded. The bill sends a strong message that the right to free expression should not be sacrificed in the name of political correctness or ideological conformity.
As the Safeguarding Honest Speech Act moves forward, it will continue to spark important conversations about the boundaries of free speech, the protection of individual rights, and the role of government in regulating language. Its passage would not only safeguard honest speech but also reaffirm the core values that underpin our democratic society.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...