Ex-Cop Chauvin Appeals Murder Conviction for George Floyd, Citing Pathologist’s Theory Jury Never Heard

Former⁢ Minneapolis Police Officer Appeals Murder Conviction in George Floyd Case, Citing New Evidence

In a dramatic turn of events, Derek Chauvin, the former police officer convicted in the high-profile death ⁣of George Floyd, has filed an appeal challenging his conviction. Chauvin claims ⁣that new‍ evidence, which was never ​presented to ​the ‍jury, ​proves his innocence, according to the Associated Press.

Chauvin, who was found guilty in ‌2021, submitted court ⁤documents ⁤on Monday, asserting that the evidence supports his argument that⁣ Floyd’s death was not caused by his actions but rather by Floyd’s underlying health condition. The former officer insists that ​had he known⁣ about the⁢ theories of a Kansas pathologist, who suggests that⁤ Floyd’s physical condition was the primary cause of death,​ he would have never pleaded guilty.

Seeking to overturn his conviction, Chauvin⁤ is requesting a new trial ⁢or,⁢ at the very least, an evidentiary hearing to‍ examine the new evidence. The case gained international attention after a video emerged showing Chauvin kneeling on Floyd’s neck‌ during an arrest, leading to Floyd’s tragic demise and sparking widespread protests and⁣ civil unrest.

Controversial Findings and Allegations

Chauvin’s appeal centers‍ around the findings of Dr. William Schaetzel, a pathologist from Topeka, Kansas, who reviewed the autopsy records and concluded that Floyd did not die from asphyxia caused by Chauvin’s actions. Instead,​ Schaetzel believes that Floyd’s death was the result‍ of a rare tumor ⁢called a paraganglioma, ‍which can trigger a fatal surge of adrenaline, ⁣as reported by The Western Journal.

Schaetzel,⁣ who felt compelled to share his diagnosis with authorities and ⁤Chauvin, expressed his desire for the truth to prevail. However, his attempts to bring attention to his findings during⁣ Chauvin’s trial reportedly ⁢went unnoticed.

Chauvin alleges that his defense attorney, Eric Nelson, failed to ⁣inform him about‌ Schaetzel’s claims and neglected to​ challenge ​the constitutionality of the federal charge. The convicted officer firmly believes that had the jury been presented with Schaetzel’s evidence, they ​would not have convicted him.

Divided Opinions and Ongoing Debate

Chauvin’s appeal comes ​amidst a‌ broader debate surrounding Floyd’s‌ cause of death. Notable figures,‍ including former Fox News ‍host Tucker Carlson, have questioned the ​official narrative. ​Carlson highlighted the testimony of former ⁣Hennepin County prosecutor Amy Sweasy, ⁤who stated that‍ Floyd’s ⁣autopsy did not indicate ⁣that the police’s actions caused his ‌death, as mentioned in The Western Journal.

Forensic pathologist Dr. Lindsey Thomas has also raised doubts, suggesting that Floyd’s high level of fentanyl in ⁣his system could have led to an overdose rather than asphyxiation, according to The Western Journal.

While Chauvin’s appeal awaits a response, the case continues to generate controversy and divide public opinion. The outcome of this​ legal battle will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for the ongoing discourse surrounding ⁣police conduct and accountability.

An Urgent Note from Our Staff:

The Western Journal has been labeled “dangerous” simply because we have a biblical worldview ‌and ​speak ​the truth about what is happening⁤ in America.

We refuse to⁣ let⁢ Big Tech and woke advertisers dictate the content we share with our community. We stand for truth. We stand ⁢for ⁤freedom. We stand ⁣with⁢ our readers.

We’re asking you to help ​us in this fight. We can’t do this​ without you.

Your donation directly helps fund our editorial team of writers and⁢ editors. If you would ⁣rather⁤ become a WJ member outright, you can do that today as well. Your support means we can continue⁢ to⁢ expose false narratives and defend traditional American⁢ values.

Please stand with us by donating today.

Thank you for your support!

The post Ex-Cop Chauvin Appeals Murder ⁢Conviction for George ⁣Floyd, Citing Pathologist’s Theory⁢ Jury Never ‍Heard appeared first on The Western Journal.

How does ⁢the emergence of ‌new evidence raise questions about the thoroughness of the initial investigation and legal representation provided to Derek Chauvin?

.

It ⁣is important to note‌ that this ⁢new evidence and the appeals process are integral parts of⁣ a fair legal system. Every individual has the right to present new evidence that could⁣ impact ⁤their case. However, it is crucial to approach this development with caution and scrutinize the validity and credibility of the evidence presented.

The case of Derek Chauvin and George Floyd’s death has sparked global ⁣outrage and ​ignited conversations about systemic racism and police brutality.‍ It has brought to the forefront⁣ the urgent need for police reform and ⁣accountability. The video footage​ of ​Chauvin kneeling on Floyd’s neck for over nine ‌minutes served as evidence of the excessive force used during the arrest.

The initial trial ⁢and subsequent⁣ conviction of Derek Chauvin⁣ were seen as crucial steps towards​ justice. Many believed that the legal system had finally held a police officer accountable for the unnecessary and tragic death of an unarmed Black man. However, the emergence of new evidence ‍presents a complex situation that⁤ will require careful consideration and examination.

The allegations made by Chauvin raise questions about the thoroughness of the initial investigation and the legal representation‍ provided to him. If Chauvin’s claims are‍ valid⁢ and the⁢ evidence presented is substantial, it would inevitably ⁤cast doubt on the validity‌ of the previous conviction.

It is important for the justice system to consider all available evidence and ensure that a fair and​ just decision is reached. This case has significant⁤ implications not only for Derek Chauvin but also⁣ for the perception of the justice system and its ability to hold individuals accountable⁣ for their actions, particularly when it‌ involves law enforcement.

It remains to be seen ​how this appeal will unfold and whether the new evidence will be deemed admissible in court. ⁢The legal process must be thorough, transparent,​ and driven by the pursuit of truth and justice. Whatever the outcome,⁢ it is ‌crucial that‌ the lessons learned from this case are used‌ to shape reforms that ⁢prevent similar tragedies from happening in the future.

As the legal battle continues,⁢ it is essential for society to maintain a balanced and informed perspective. The case of Derek Chauvin ⁢and George Floyd represents a larger issue that extends beyond one ‌individual or one incident. It must prompt conversations regarding systemic⁤ change, police training, and the realignment of priorities within law enforcement agencies.

Ultimately, the outcome of this appeal⁢ will have ‍far-reaching implications and will inevitably shape the ongoing discourse surrounding police conduct and accountability. It is crucial that the legal process unfolds with​ integrity and serves as a catalyst for meaningful‍ change. Only then can we hope ⁤to create a more just and inclusive society for all.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases