Conservative News Daily

Judge Rejects Attempt to Disqualify Trump Under Insurrection Clause, Orders State Official to Put 45 Back on the Ballot

Colorado Judge Rejects Attempt to‌ Disqualify Trump⁢ from 2024 Election‌ Ballot

In a stunning ​decision, Judge Sarah Wallace of ⁢Colorado dismissed an effort on ‍Friday to remove ⁢former ‍President⁣ Donald⁤ Trump from the ‍state’s 2024‍ election ballot. In her ‍102-page ruling, Judge Wallace declared that Trump does not fall under the category of⁢ an ​”officer of the United States” who is disqualified from holding office according to section three of‍ the 14th Amendment. As a result, ‍she ordered Colorado’s secretary of state to include ⁣Trump on the primary ballot.

However, Judge Wallace did acknowledge that ‌Trump was involved ⁢in the January ​6,⁣ 2021 insurrection through incitement, stating⁣ that his speech is not⁣ protected by the First Amendment. This ruling comes ⁢as a‍ blow to those⁣ seeking to hold⁢ Trump ⁤accountable for his actions.

During ‌the ten-day trial that began in ‍October, a staggering 70 witnesses testified under oath, providing crucial evidence for the case.

Will ‍Trump Become the Republican Nominee?

Will Trump become the Republican nominee?

For⁢ more details, you can read the⁣ Colorado Final Order on Scribd.

All content created‌ by the ​Daily Caller ⁤News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan ⁢newswire service,‍ is available without charge to any ‍legitimate ‍news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished⁣ articles must include our logo, our⁣ reporter’s‌ byline ‍and their ‌DCNF affiliation.

For‌ any questions about our guidelines or partnering‌ with‍ us, please contact​ [email protected].

The⁢ post Judge Rejects‌ Attempt to Disqualify Trump Under Insurrection Clause, Orders State Official to Put⁢ 45 Back on the Ballot appeared first on The ‍Western Journal.

How does ‍Judge Wallace’s recent decision regarding Donald Trump’s disqualification from the 2024 election⁢ ballot raise concerns about holding him accountable ​for his actions in the January 6th insurrection?

In this article, ‌we will discuss ‍the recent decision ‌made by Colorado Judge⁣ Sarah Wallace in regards to ​disqualifying Donald Trump from the 2024‌ election⁣ ballot. Judge⁢ Wallace’s ruling has raised a significant amount of attention and debate among the public.

On Friday, Judge Wallace‍ dismissed an effort​ to⁢ remove Donald ⁢Trump⁢ from the ⁤Colorado 2024 election ballot.‍ In her 102-page ruling, ‍she declared that Trump does not fall ‌under‍ the category of an “officer of the United States” who⁤ is disqualified ‍from holding office according ⁢to the 14th⁤ Amendment, section three. This decision ‌has resulted‌ in the‍ secretary of state being ordered to include Trump on the primary ballot.

While⁣ the ruling may ⁤come as a surprise to many, it is essential to note that Judge Wallace did acknowledge⁢ Trump’s involvement in the January 6, 2021 insurrection, stating that ⁢his ‍speech is not protected by the⁣ First Amendment. ⁤This acknowledgment raises⁣ concerns among those‌ who seek to⁤ hold Trump accountable for his ⁣actions.

The trial, which lasted ten days and‌ began in October, witnessed a remarkable 70‌ witnesses testifying under oath. These witnesses provided crucial evidence for the ⁣case, leading to Judge Wallace’s decision.

With this ruling, the focus⁣ now shifts⁣ to the question of whether⁤ Trump ​will become the Republican candidate for the 2024 election. Supporters ⁣of Trump’s disqualification argue that his involvement in⁣ the insurrection should disqualify him from running for office. On the other hand,​ those who supported the ruling ‍believe that Trump should have the opportunity to ​run, as he is not currently considered an “officer of the United States.”

As the news‍ of this decision spreads, it is expected that both sides of the political spectrum will engage in further discussions ​and​ debates. The ruling⁤ by Judge⁣ Sarah Wallace has undoubtedly sparked conversations about the interpretation‌ of the 14th⁣ Amendment’s disqualification clause and the consequences of political actions that incite violence.

It is important to recognize that this ruling is specific⁢ to the state of Colorado. Other states may have different ⁣interpretations and criteria for disqualifying candidates from their election ballots. As the 2024 ‌election⁤ approaches, it will be intriguing to observe​ how this decision impacts‌ both the‌ Republican Party and the future of American politics.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker