Judge Rejects Effort To Kick Trump Off Ballot In Colorado Under 14th Amendment
A Judge in Colorado Rejects Challenge to Remove Donald Trump from 2024 Presidential Primary Ballot
In a significant ruling, a judge in Colorado has dismissed a challenge filed by a Left-leaning group seeking to remove former President Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 presidential primary ballot under the 14th Amendment. The judge, Sarah B. Wallace, firmly stated that the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment does not apply to the presidency, thus allowing Trump to remain on the ballot.
Challenge Filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
The challenge was filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington on behalf of six Colorado voters. However, Judge Wallace emphasized that disqualifying a presidential candidate requires a clear and unmistakable indication of intent, which was absent in this case. This ruling follows similar unsuccessful attempts in Michigan and Minnesota to block Trump from appearing on state ballots.
Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung expressed satisfaction with the ruling, describing it as another blow to the “un-American ballot challenges” orchestrated by desperate Democrats. Cheung further criticized their attempts to interfere with the upcoming presidential election, asserting that President Joe Biden is a failed leader on the path to defeat.
While Judge Wallace acknowledged that the Capitol riot constituted an “insurrection” and accused Trump of intending to incite political violence, she maintained that the insurrection clause did not apply to him. This decision is likely to be appealed by Mario Nicolais, the lawyer representing the group challenging Trump’s eligibility.
CHECK OUT THE DAILY WIRE BLACK FRIDAY SHOPPING GUIDE
Trump, currently the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican nomination, has gained momentum in polling from crucial swing states, surpassing President Joe Biden. This ruling coincided with House Speaker Mike Johnson’s announcement to release footage from January 6 for public viewing. Notably, the newly shared footage depicted individuals calmly walking past law enforcement officers in a hallway.
What are the mixed reactions to Judge Wallace’s ruling on Trump’s eligibility for the 2024 presidential primary ballot, and what are the potential implications and discussions that may arise from this decision
By Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a Left-leaning group that describes itself as a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting ethics and accountability in government. CREW argued that the events of January 6, 2021, when a violent mob stormed the US Capitol, constituted an insurrection and that Trump’s role in inciting the mob disqualified him from future presidential candidacy.
The 14th Amendment and the Insurrection Clause
The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified in 1868 and provides equal protection under the law to all citizens. Section 3 of the amendment, known as the “insurrection clause,” states that anyone who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States shall be disqualified from holding any public office. CREW argued that Trump’s actions on January 6th constituted an insurrection and therefore disqualified him from running for president.
However, Judge Wallace firmly disagreed with this interpretation of the 14th Amendment. In her ruling, she stated that the insurrection clause was intended to prevent former Confederate leaders from holding public office, and its application to the presidency was not supported by the text or the historical context of the amendment. She further explained that while the events of January 6th were deeply concerning, they did not meet the legal standard of insurrection as outlined in the 14th Amendment.
The Colorado Judge’s Decision
Judge Wallace’s decision has significant implications for both Trump and the upcoming 2024 presidential election. By allowing Trump to remain on the Colorado primary ballot, she has effectively cleared the path for his potential candidacy. The decision also sets a precedent for other states facing similar challenges regarding Trump’s eligibility.
It is important to note that this ruling does not absolve Trump of any potential criminal or civil charges related to the events of January 6th. It pertains solely to his eligibility to appear on the presidential primary ballot. The judge’s decision does not exonerate him from any legal consequences for his alleged role in inciting the mob.
Reaction to the Ruling
The ruling has generated mixed reactions from both political commentators and the general public. Supporters of Trump argue that the judge’s decision affirms his right to participate in the democratic process and that attempts to disqualify him from future elections are politically motivated. Critics, on the other hand, express concerns about the implications of allowing someone accused of inciting an insurrection to run for the highest office in the country.
The ruling is also likely to reignite discussions about the interpretation and application of the 14th Amendment, particularly the insurrection clause. Legal scholars and experts may analyze the judge’s reasoning and assess whether it aligns with the original intent of the amendment.
Conclusion
In this significant ruling, Judge Sarah B. Wallace of Colorado dismissed the challenge filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) to remove Donald Trump from Colorado’s 2024 presidential primary ballot. The judge reasoned that the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment does not apply to the presidency and therefore allows Trump to remain eligible for future presidential candidacy. This decision has consequential implications for Trump’s potential run in 2024 and sets a precedent for similar challenges across the country. However, it is essential to note that this ruling does not absolve him from any potential legal consequences for his alleged role in the events of January 6, 2021.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...