Conservative News Daily

Federal Appeals Court Appears to Indicate It Will Take an Ax to Trump Gag Order

Good News ‍for Donald Trump: Federal Appeals ​Court Likely to Narrow Gag ⁤Order

There⁤ may be some‍ good news for Donald Trump. Politico ​reported ‌Monday that a federal appeals court panel is likely to “significantly narrow” a gag order against⁣ the former president imposed for his criminal trial in Washington.

Trump ‍is facing four felony charges in the case brought by special ⁤counsel Jack Smith‌ related ​to his challenge of the 2020 election ⁤and the Jan. 6, ‌2021,‍ Capitol incursion.

The gag order prevents ⁤Trump from publicly discussing witnesses, prosecutors,⁢ and courthouse ​staff related to the case.

However, the panel of judges⁣ from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has concerns that the restrictions​ are ambiguous and could interfere with Trump’s right to campaign in the 2024 presidential election, Politico reported. He is the leading Republican in the‌ race.

Among those expressing ‌reservations about the gag⁤ order is ⁣Obama appointee⁤ Judge ⁣Patricia Millett, who questioned whether it could hinder his right to respond to political attacks, especially during the latter stages of​ a presidential campaign.

“He‍ has to speak ‘Miss Manners’ while everyone else is throwing targets at ⁣him?” Millett said during oral arguments in the ‍case, according to Politico.

“It would be really hard in a debate, when everyone​ else is going at you full bore,” she continued. “Your attorneys would have to have scripted little things you can say.”

“It’s not how I​ want my​ children ⁤to speak, but that’s really not the question,” the judge added.

Another judge to raise issues with the order‌ is Nina Pillard, ​who “suggested ​on at least five occasions that the trial judge’s order ⁣goes too ⁤far by appearing to bar Trump from making hostile comments​ about individuals in the public eye who could be witnesses in the case,” Politico reported.

It is unknown exactly‍ how the appellate court intends to proceed.

Should ‌it refuse to block ⁢the order entirely, Trump would then have the ‌right ‍to take the matter to the Supreme‌ Court.

The gag order was imposed by ⁢U.S. District ‌Judge Tanya Chutkan last month but has been suspended​ as the appeals court reviews the matter.

This specific gag order is separate‌ from one imposed by⁢ New York ⁣Judge ‍Arthur Engoron in the civil case against Trump, which prevents him from making public comments about the judge’s principal law clerk or other court staff.

The case, filed by New York⁤ Attorney General Letitia ‍James, alleges fraudulent business practices within Trump’s business empire.

Trump has pleaded ⁢not guilty to all the⁢ criminal charges⁤ against him.


A Note from Our ⁤Staff:

Did you ⁣know that 90 percent of advertisers ⁢will have nothing to do with ⁣The Western⁤ Journal? ​The liberal⁣ elites have put us⁤ on one of their ⁣financial kill lists.

They did ⁢it because we’ve told the truth and spoken out against them for over a decade. And since they couldn’t shut us up, now, they’re trying to starve us out.

We’re turning to you because, frankly, we ⁤have to have your help. It might not sound like⁤ much, but just one membership to The Western Journal can make a real difference.

We don’t‍ have a huge staff, big salaries, or deep ⁢donor pockets. We’re‌ family-owned and independent. But because we’re independent from the elites, we have to rely ​on readers ⁢like you.

Can we count on ‍you⁣ for just a ⁢single⁢ membership? The cost of a month-long membership is less ‌than a single ⁣cup of Starbucks coffee. And, unlike with Starbucks, ⁣you can be 100 ‍percent certain that every penny we ‌spend goes toward fighting for traditional American values and against liberal elites.

Please help us continue exposing the truth. Please join today.

Thank you ​for reading The Western⁢ Journal!

The post Federal Appeals Court Appears to Indicate It ⁤Will⁢ Take⁣ an Ax to Trump Gag Order appeared ⁤first on The Western​ Journal.

Why are concerns being raised about the gag order potentially‌ interfering with​ Trump’s ability to⁢ campaign in the 2024 presidential election?

The Western Journal, a conservative ⁤news outlet, has reported that there may be some​ good news for former US President Donald Trump. Politico has stated that a federal appeals court panel is likely to “significantly narrow” a​ gag order that was imposed on ‍Trump for his criminal trial in⁤ Washington.

Trump is facing four felony charges in a case brought by special counsel Jack‍ Smith related to⁣ his challenge of the 2020 election and the Capitol incursion on January 6, 2021. The current gag order prevents Trump from‌ publicly‍ discussing witnesses, prosecutors, and courthouse staff related to the case.

However, the panel of judges from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has expressed concerns that the ⁤restrictions are ambiguous and could interfere with ‍Trump’s right to campaign in the 2024 presidential election, as⁢ he is currently the leading Republican candidate. One judge, Patricia Millett, who was appointed ‍by former President Barack Obama, questioned whether the gag order could hinder Trump’s ability to respond to political attacks, particularly during the latter stages of a presidential‌ campaign.

“It​ would be really hard in a debate ​when everyone ⁣else ​is going at you full bore,” Judge Millett stated during oral arguments ⁣in the case. “Your attorneys would have to have scripted little things you can say.”

Another judge, Nina Pillard,‍ has also raised issues with the order, suggesting that it may go too far by appearing to bar Trump from ‌making hostile comments about individuals who⁣ could be witnesses in ‍the⁢ case.

It is currently ​unknown how the appellate court intends to​ proceed with the gag order. If the court refuses to block the order entirely, Trump will have the right to take the matter to the Supreme Court.

It is ⁤worth noting that this specific⁤ gag ‍order ⁤is separate from one imposed by New York ⁣Judge Arthur Engoron in​ the civil case against Trump, which prevents him from making⁢ public comments about the judge’s principal ⁤law clerk or other​ court staff. ​The civil case, filed by New York Attorney General⁢ Letitia ‌James, alleges fraudulent‌ business practices within Trump’s business⁤ empire.

As ​of now, Trump has pleaded‍ not guilty to all the​ criminal charges against him.

In‌ conclusion, the federal ​appeals court panel is likely to narrow the ⁣gag‍ order ​against Donald Trump, which would allow⁢ him to publicly discuss witnesses and other individuals related to his criminal trial in Washington. This decision comes ​as concerns were raised⁤ about the order⁣ interfering⁢ with Trump’s⁢ right⁢ to campaign in the 2024 presidential election. The specifics of how the appellate court intends to proceed are unknown, but ‍if needed, Trump can take the matter to the ‍Supreme Court.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker