Dylan Mulvaney makes Forbes’ ’30 Under 30′ list
I am one of the original Forbes Enterprise Award winners
I had the honor of receiving the prestigious Forbes Enterprise Award in 2006 from none other than Steve Forbes himself. This recognition was bestowed upon me for my creation of a captivating children’s television series and brand that focused on promoting family values.
Receiving this award was an exhilarating experience, especially because it acknowledged the purpose behind my work – making the world a better place for children and families. It aligned perfectly with the founding principles of Forbes, which dates back to 1917 when Bertie Charles Forbes established it as a media and publishing powerhouse. Being associated with the Forbes family meant that you were making a significant and positive contribution to society, instantly earning credibility.
However, fast forward 17 years, and I am disheartened to learn that Forbes has now recognized Dylan Mulvaney, a transgender social media influencer who is undoubtedly struggling with mental illness, in a similar manner. It is truly a fall from grace for Forbes.
Mulvaney has become Forbes’ new standard of accomplishment and excellence, a role model who is shaping social acceptability for our youth. While I understand that Forbes has evolved over time and embraced progressive ideologies, this is a new low for them.
What saddens me even more is that no one seems to care enough about Mulvaney’s well-being to help him. Similar to the charade surrounding President Joe Biden, Mulvaney is being used as a pawn in a disturbing agenda pushed by liberals to dismantle traditional family values and destabilize the United States. Forbes’ recognition on their ”30 Under 30″ list is just another way to further this destructive agenda.
Many, like Nick Sortor on X, dismiss Mulvaney as nothing more than a joke. Sortor wrote, “Looks like @Forbes has put TikToker Dylan Mulvaney on their ’30 Under 30′ list. What are Dylan’s accomplishments, you ask? Playing dress up and DEMANDING you call him a woman. What a joke.”
Looks like @Forbes has put TikToker Dylan Mulvaney on their “30 Under 30” list
What are Dylan’s accomplishments, you ask?
Playing dress up and DEMANDING you call him a woman
What a joke pic.twitter.com/cbqM0p0tyv
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) November 29, 2023
Mulvaney’s claim to fame is simply using social media to validate gender confusion. Exploiting the most vulnerable among us, especially children, is nothing new, but the way Mulvaney has done it is particularly concerning. Profiting from the exploitation of youth may bring financial success, but it is nothing to be proud of.
Like the Pied Piper, Mulvaney seems to have temporarily diverted attention from his inner demons by attracting minors to follow him on his gender transition journey through his “Days of Girlhood” TikTok series. This series, which garnered one billion views, turned followers into fortunes, as reported by Townhall.
Forbes honors Dylan Mulvaney for “turning followers into fortunes.” pic.twitter.com/ZqbKGMk9AD
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) November 28, 2023
In an interview with Forbes, Mulvaney stated, “Whether somebody’s trans or not, I just hope they can watch my videos and feel inspired to unlock a new part of themselves.” While the intention may seem noble, the package it comes in lacks honesty.
Conservative America sees through this facade. They want nothing to do with Mulvaney, especially when it comes to influencing their children or challenging the values that define the American way. Many question Mulvaney’s accomplishments beyond tanking Bud Light.
The massive boycott of Bud Light beer due to Anheuser-Busch’s endorsement of Mulvaney sent a clear and resounding message. It was more than just a protest; it was a battle cry. Even Joe Rogan couldn’t hold back, calling Anheuser-Busch’s decision to hire Mulvaney “dumb” and Mulvaney himself a “mentally ill… attention whore.”
According to Fortune magazine, “U.S. dollar sales of Bud Light were down 29 percent in the four weeks ending Oct. 21 compared to the same period a year ago.” This boycott was one of the costliest mistakes the company has ever made.
Despite the backlash faced by Anheuser-Busch, Hurricane Mulvaney continues to secure partnerships with Nike and Mac in the name of “inclusivity.” He is handsomely rewarded for his role in reshaping the culture of the United States into a more progressive and destructive one, which will inevitably discard him as quickly as it made him a hero.
Last year alone, Mulvaney earned $2 million and received numerous awards, including Breakout Creator of the Year at the Streamy Awards. He was even named “Woman of the Year” by Attitude magazine and had a meeting with President Joe Biden to discuss trans rights. One can only imagine the nature of that conversation, with both men being propped up by their handlers in a “kumbaya” state.
In my opinion, neither Mulvaney nor Forbes deserve the spotlight, let alone any awards. Forbes has effectively rendered their “30 Under 30” list meaningless to at least half the nation, if not more. All the effort they put into setting themselves apart has been tarnished by a single decision. Bertie Charles Forbes must be rolling in his grave.
The post Forbes Names Dylan Mulvaney on Its ’30 Under 30′ List appeared first on The Western Journal.
Why should Forbes prioritize individuals who make substantial, positive contributions to society over social media influencers?
They argue that Mulvaney’s presence on Forbes’ “30 Under 30” list undermines its credibility and further perpetuates a destructive agenda. They believe that Forbes should prioritize individuals who make substantial, positive contributions to society, rather than focusing on social media influencers who exploit vulnerable individuals for personal gain.
It is evident that there is a stark contrast between the original Forbes Enterprise Award winners and the current honorees. The original winners, like myself, were recognized for creating meaningful and impactful contributions to society. We worked hard to promote values and principles that aligned with Forbes’ longstanding reputation as a credible and reputable publication.
However, the recent recognition of Dylan Mulvaney raises questions about Forbes’ standards and priorities. Mulvaney has gained attention primarily for exploiting the confusion and vulnerability of individuals, particularly children, through social media. This type of exploitation should not be celebrated or rewarded. It sets a dangerous precedent by normalizing and profiting from the confusion around gender identity.
While it is important to acknowledge and support individuals who are struggling with their identity, it should not come at the expense of promoting destructive agendas or destabilizing traditional family values. Forbes should focus on celebrating individuals who make a genuinely positive impact on society, rather than just chasing trends or promoting controversial figures for the sake of publicity.
In conclusion, the recognition of Dylan Mulvaney as a Forbes honoree undermines the credibility and reputation of the publication. It sends a message that exploiting vulnerable individuals for personal gain is acceptable and praiseworthy. Forbes should reevaluate its standards and consider the long-term consequences of celebrating individuals who do not make significant positive contributions to society. By doing so, Forbes can regain its status as a respected and reliable platform for recognizing true enterprise and excellence.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...