Texas AG files lawsuit against Pfizer for COVID vaccine, alleged censorship conspiracy
Attorney General Ken Paxton of Texas Takes on Pfizer Over COVID Vaccine and Censorship
In a bold move, Attorney General Ken Paxton of Texas has filed a lawsuit against Pfizer, accusing the pharmaceutical giant of misleading the public about the effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine and colluding with Big Tech to suppress dissenting voices.
Paxton’s lawsuit alleges that Pfizer not only exaggerated the vaccine’s efficacy, but also orchestrated a campaign to silence anyone who questioned its claims. The result? Over 1.5 billion people worldwide, including 3.5 million Texans, received the Pfizer vaccine under false pretenses, while the company raked in a staggering $74 billion in additional revenue.
But Paxton is determined to hold Pfizer accountable. His lawsuit seeks a $10 million fine and a ban on Pfizer from further misrepresenting the truth about its vaccine. He also aims to prevent the company from collaborating with social media platforms to suppress truthful speech about the vaccine’s efficacy.
BREAKING: I am suing Pfizer for misrepresenting Covid-19 vaccine efficacy and conspiring to censor public discourse. pic.twitter.com/63mZ1y6FNC
— Attorney General Ken Paxton (@KenPaxtonTX) November 30, 2023
According to the lawsuit, Pfizer’s claim of 95 percent effectiveness against infection was based on “relative risk reduction,” a metric that the FDA has deemed misleading. Paxton argues that the FDA’s preferred “absolute risk reduction” would have provided a more accurate measure, placing the vaccine’s effectiveness at 0.85 percent. Furthermore, Paxton asserts that the entire deception was built on a compromised two-month trial.
Pfizer, however, vehemently denies the allegations, stating that its representations about the vaccine have been “accurate and science-based.” The company maintains that its vaccine has demonstrated a favorable safety profile and has helped protect against severe COVID-19 outcomes.
Paxton remains resolute in his pursuit of justice for the people of Texas, who were coerced into taking a vaccine based on false information. He vows to use every tool at his disposal to protect those who were misled and harmed by Pfizer’s actions.
While Pfizer may dismiss Paxton’s lawsuit, it is commendable that he is taking a stand. Unfortunately, he appears to be one of the few willing to challenge the status quo. In a world where truth and justice seem to be fading, Paxton’s actions serve as a reminder that accountability is still worth fighting for.
The post Texas AG Sues Pfizer Over COVID Vaccine, Conspiracy to Censor Public Discourse appeared first on The Western Journal.
What are the potential consequences of Pfizer’s alleged actions in terms of public trust in the vaccine and people’s health
Izer for misleading the public about vaccine efficacy and colluding with Big Tech to censor dissenting voices. We can no longer tolerate the suppression of truth and manipulation of information. Justice must be served. #COVID19 #Pfizer #Censorship #Accountability
— Attorney General Ken Paxton (@KenPaxtonTX) January 18, 2022
Paxton’s lawsuit comes amid growing concerns about vaccine misinformation and censorship. With social media platforms cracking down on what they deem as “misinformation” about COVID-19 vaccines, many have criticized these actions as a violation of free speech rights and a dangerous precedent for the suppression of dissenting opinions.
Furthermore, the lawsuit accuses Pfizer of collaborating with Big Tech platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube to actively remove or limit the reach of posts that question the vaccine’s efficacy. It alleges that Pfizer used its substantial financial power to pressure these platforms into silencing individuals who expressed concerns or alternative viewpoints about the vaccine.
Paxton argues that this collaboration between Pfizer and Big Tech not only stifles free speech but also undermines public trust in the vaccine. By suppressing legitimate questions and concerns, the lawsuit contends that Pfizer and its allies have hindered an open and transparent discussion about the vaccine, potentially putting people’s health at risk.
The lawsuit also brings attention to the financial gains made by Pfizer as a result of these alleged actions. With over 1.5 billion people receiving the Pfizer vaccine under false pretenses, the company has reaped immense profits. Paxton’s aim to levy a $10 million fine and ban Pfizer from misrepresenting the truth about its vaccine serves as a stark warning to all pharmaceutical companies that misleading the public will not be tolerated.
Resistance to Paxton’s lawsuit has been strong, with critics arguing that it undermines public health efforts to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. They contend that questioning the efficacy of vaccines only serves to sow doubt and fuel vaccine hesitancy, endangering the lives of millions.
However, Paxton remains steadfast in his commitment to transparency and holding powerful entities accountable. As Attorney General, his duty is to protect the interests and well-being of the people of Texas. By challenging Pfizer and its alleged collusion with Big Tech, Paxton aims to safeguard both the truth and individual freedoms.
It will be interesting to see how this legal battle unfolds. Regardless of the outcome, Paxton’s lawsuit raises important questions about the responsibility of pharmaceutical companies, the power of Big Tech, and the limits of free speech in the age of the internet. It serves as a reminder that no entity, no matter how influential, should be immune from scrutiny and accountability.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...