Families protest as Supreme Court considers Purdue bankruptcy
OAN’s John King
1:10 PM – Tuesday, December 5, 2023
Supreme Court Justices Express Doubt Over Purdue Pharma Bankruptcy Settlement
Supreme Court justices seem skeptical of both sides after hearing oral arguments over the Purdue Pharma bankruptcy settlement. One America’s John King has more.
Supreme Court justices seem skeptical of both sides after hearing oral arguments over the Purdue Pharma bankruptcy settlement.
Biden’s re-election campaign faces mounting pressure from the Muslim-American community.
A Former Leprosy Settlement in Hawaii Finds New Purpose
What was once a settlement for those stricken with Leprosy in Hawaii is now a refuge for the remaining former patients.
GOP Lawmakers Gain Support for Impeachment Inquiry into President Biden
GOP lawmakers tell One America News they believe they now have the votes within the Republican Conference to move ahead with a formal vote for the impeachment inquiry into President Biden.
Spanish Media Outlets File $600 Million Lawsuit Against Facebook Owner Meta Platforms
A group representing 83 Spanish media outlets has filed a $600 million lawsuit against Facebook owner Meta Platforms.
Verizon Offers Streaming Subscriptions to Netflix and Warner Bros Discovery-Owned Max Platforms
Verizon said it would offer streaming subscriptions to Netflix and Warner Bros Discovery-owned Max platforms as a bundle to its customers.
Global Mega-Cap Companies Experience Surge in Market Capitalizations
Market capitalizations of global mega-cap companies surged, buoyed by a decline in U.S. yields and growing anticipation of potential rate cuts amid diminishing worries about inflation.
Advertisers Consider Leaving Elon Musk’s X Social Media Platform
More advertisers are likely to flee Elon Musk’s social media platform X after the billionaire lashed out at some of the biggest names in the media industry.
What potential impact could the Supreme Court’s decision on this case have on future lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies involved in public health crises
Supreme Court justices have expressed doubt over the Purdue Pharma bankruptcy settlement following oral arguments. The skepticism from the justices stems from their reservations about both sides of the settlement. This development has drawn attention to the ongoing legal battle surrounding the pharmaceutical company’s bankruptcy case.
The case involves Purdue Pharma, the manufacturer of the widely criticized opioid painkiller OxyContin. The company filed for bankruptcy in 2019 amid thousands of lawsuits accusing it of fueling the opioid epidemic in the United States.
The bankruptcy settlement, which was reached in 2020, proposed the creation of a trust fund to compensate victims and address the repercussions of the opioid crisis. The settlement would also require the Sackler family, who owns Purdue Pharma, to contribute a substantial sum of money towards the fund.
However, during the recent oral arguments, Supreme Court justices expressed skepticism about the details of the settlement. Both the settlement’s terms and the involvement of the Sackler family came under scrutiny.
Some justices questioned whether the settlement would adequately compensate victims and hold Purdue Pharma accountable for its alleged role in the opioid crisis. They expressed concern that the settlement could shield the Sackler family from further legal action, despite accusations of their involvement in the marketing and distribution of OxyContin.
Additionally, the justices raised doubts about the fairness of the settlement when considering how it would affect future claims against Purdue Pharma. They questioned whether the settlement’s terms would prevent individuals from pursuing their own lawsuits against the company.
The Supreme Court’s skepticism indicates the complexities and controversies surrounding the Purdue Pharma bankruptcy case. The justices’ reservations suggest that further examination and potentially modifications to the settlement may be necessary.
The case has attracted considerable attention due to its implications for holding pharmaceutical companies accountable for their role in the opioid epidemic. The treatment of this case has broader implications for other companies facing similar legal battles in the future.
The oral arguments presented before the Supreme Court shed light on the ongoing debate over whether the Purdue Pharma bankruptcy settlement is truly just and fair. The doubts expressed by the justices signal the need for a thorough review of the settlement’s terms and the extent to which it serves the interests of the victims.
As the Supreme Court deliberates on this case, its outcome will have far-reaching consequences for both the pharmaceutical industry and the victims of the opioid crisis. Only time will tell how the court’s decision will shape the future of accountability for companies implicated in public health crises.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...