The federalist

Weiss Indictment echoes false allegation: Chinese felon paid Hunter Biden $1M for legal defense

The Shocking Truth Behind Hunter Biden’s $1 Million Payment

The recent federal indictment against Hunter ⁣Biden revealed shocking details of his⁣ four-year tax evasion scheme and his attempt to file a false return in 2018. However, one crucial⁢ detail was overlooked⁣ by Special Counsel David Weiss: the ⁤$1 million payment Hunter Biden received from Patrick Ho, a Chinese associate under federal investigation.

Roughly​ contemporaneous with the arrest of [Patrick Ho], an individual associated with CEFC,‍ on or about November⁤ 2, 2017,⁤ [Hudson West III] received⁢ a $1,000,000⁤ deposit. At the Defendant’s direction, on or about March ⁢22, ​2018, ⁤the funds were transferred to Owasco, ‍LLC. The‍ memo⁣ line of this ​transfer indicated it was for ‘[Patrick Ho] Representation.’ ‍To​ justify the transfer, [Hudson West III] was provided ⁣with a letter⁣ stating‍ that the funds were a retainer for the Defendant’s representation of ​ [Patrick Ho] who was under criminal investigation⁣ in the United States.

This $1 million⁢ payment is significant not only because it shows Hunter Biden’s⁤ disregard⁢ for his tax obligations, but also because his claim ‌that ⁣it was a⁢ retainer‍ for legal services is highly questionable. Hunter ‌Biden’s law⁤ firm was ⁣Owasco PC, ‌not Owasco LLC, the entity‍ that ⁢received ​the payment. It raises suspicions about the‌ true⁢ nature of the payment and whether it was embezzled or used for⁤ other purposes.

During a plea hearing, Hunter Biden admitted that he was not serving as counsel for Patrick Ho, further undermining his‍ claim. The inconsistencies in his statements and the ‍choice to⁢ direct the payment to a different‌ entity raise serious doubts about the legality of the transaction.

Surprisingly, the recent indictment did not address these crucial facts or charge Hunter Biden for‍ any potential crimes ⁤related to the $1 million payment. This raises concerns about Special Counsel Weiss’s intentions‌ and whether‌ he plans to thoroughly investigate the matter or simply brush it aside.

While ⁤there⁢ may be hints of a renewed‌ focus on ‌the⁣ Foreign ​Agents ⁣Registration Act, it is clear that more‌ needs to be done‍ to uncover the extent⁢ of the Biden family’s corruption. Fortunately, the House oversight committees‌ and Senator Chuck⁢ Grassley will continue their pursuit of⁤ truth ‍and justice,⁣ regardless of Weiss’s actions.

⁤How⁤ does the $1 million payment from an ‌individual ​involved in criminal activities raise questions about the nature‍ of Hunter Biden’s financial activities and the need ​for a⁣ thorough investigation into his financial dealings

Eous with Hunter Biden’s ⁤$1‌ million payment from Patrick‍ Ho, Ho himself was arrested by US authorities in November 2017⁣ on charges of bribery and money laundering. The indictment against Ho alleged that he had paid bribes ‌to⁤ African officials on behalf of a Chinese energy company. The fact that Hunter Biden ‌received such a substantial payment from a ⁢person involved‌ in such criminal⁣ activities raises serious questions about both his financial dealings and his‌ judgment.⁣

It is important to note that Hunter Biden’s involvement with ⁣Patrick Ho is not a new ‍revelation. In fact, it was reported by⁤ both The New York Times and ⁢The Washington Post‌ in 2018.⁢ However, the significance of this payment seems to have been⁤ overlooked or ignored by ⁤many‍ in the mainstream media. The question that needs to be answered is‍ why.

For years, critics have raised concerns about the foreign business dealings of⁢ Joe Biden’s son. Hunter Biden’s position on the board of Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy company, while his​ father was vice president has been the subject of intense scrutiny. Many‌ have argued that his involvement with Burisma was a clear conflict of interest and ⁣a potential avenue for foreign entities to gain influence with the Biden⁤ family. The $1 million payment from Patrick ⁣Ho only adds weight to these​ concerns.

Some may argue that this payment is inconsequential and unrelated to Hunter Biden’s ‌tax evasion scheme. ⁣However, the‍ magnitude of the amount and the source of the payment⁣ cannot be ⁤dismissed. It ⁣raises questions about the ​true ‌nature of Hunter Biden’s financial activities and​ whether⁤ they extend beyond⁣ mere negligence in filing taxes.

Furthermore,⁤ this payment highlights the ⁤need for a thorough investigation into Hunter‌ Biden’s financial dealings.⁤ The⁣ fact that he received⁢ a ⁢large sum of money ⁢from an ​individual ​involved in criminal activities should not⁢ be brushed aside. It is ⁤crucial to determine whether this⁢ payment was ‌part of a larger ⁢scheme, whether it was‌ used to influence ⁣Hunter Biden or his father⁣ in any way, and whether there are any other⁢ questionable ⁣financial transactions that have gone unnoticed.

Unfortunately, the media and some politicians have been quick to‍ dismiss or downplay⁣ any ⁤concerns⁣ regarding Hunter Biden’s financial activities.⁤ This selective reporting only serves to undermine ⁤the public’s trust and fuels conspiracy theories. The American people deserve⁤ transparency and a comprehensive​ examination of any potential wrongdoing.

It is not‍ enough ​to simply sweep this‍ $1 million payment under the rug.⁣ The evidence points to a much larger and more complex issue. The American public deserves answers, and‌ the truth behind Hunter Biden’s financial dealings must be fully uncovered. Only then can we⁤ ensure⁢ that our political system⁤ is free from corruption and that those ⁢in power are held to the highest standards of integrity.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker