Report: Alito’s Dobbs draft led to Roe overturn by Supreme Court justices

Republican-Appointed Justices on Supreme Court Agreed to Overturn Roe v. Wade, Report Reveals

According to a new report, most of‌ the Republican-appointed justices on the Supreme Court agreed last year to co-sign Justice Samuel Alito’s ​draft decision overturning Roe v. Wade ⁢soon after they ‌were shown‍ the 98-page decision.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, one ⁣of three appointees ⁤of former President ​Donald Trump, was⁢ one‌ jurist who quickly agreed to sign off on ⁣Alito’s Feb. 10, 2022, written opinion ​in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization case, doing​ so just 10 minutes ​after it arrived at his desk.

The​ high court⁤ typically assigns specific justices to write the majority⁢ opinions of cases after​ oral arguments take place, and the draft opinions are⁤ sent to colleagues to help negotiate changes and use their votes ​to ‍shape the outcome.

Gorsuch made no edits to the opinion, according‍ to two⁣ sources who reviewed messages from people close to the⁣ justices. The next day, Justice ​Clarence‌ Thomas joined the draft opinion without requesting edits, followed by⁤ Justices ⁣Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh ‌joining just⁤ a few days later.

Barrett, the newest member of the high court at the time, had previously expressed her opposition to “abortion on demand.” However, she initially reversed her decision to grant cert for the Dobbs case,⁢ but it still gained enough votes to proceed to oral arguments.

The Dobbs decision effectively rolled back 50 years of abortion⁢ access precedent ⁣set under Roe, allowing​ Republican-led states to impose stricter limits on abortions.

Following a leak of the Dobbs ‍draft opinion, public outrage ensued, leading ‌to protests and a decline in⁤ public faith in the Supreme⁣ Court. The⁢ leak also⁤ caused a severe rift among‌ the justices, making it difficult for them to reconsider their co-signing of Alito’s opinion.

Public approval of the Supreme Court ‌dropped to historic⁣ lows, with a recent survey showing that the court’s job approval ⁤remains in the low 40s.

What are the​ potential consequences for⁤ women’s reproductive rights⁣ if Roe v. Wade is overturned?

Eport, Republican-appointed justices on the Supreme Court have agreed‌ to overturn the ⁢landmark decision‌ of Roe v. Wade. This revelation has sent shockwaves throughout the country, as it⁤ has far-reaching implications for women’s⁤ reproductive rights in ​the United States.

Roe v. ⁣Wade, ​decided in 1973, established a constitutional ‌right to ⁤abortion. The case recognized that a⁣ woman’s right‌ to choose ⁢to have an abortion is protected under the ⁤Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Ever since ⁢its ⁣ruling,⁤ this decision has been a point of contention ‌between conservatives and‍ liberals.

The⁣ report indicates that the Republican-appointed justices, who now hold a⁣ majority on‌ the Supreme Court, have reached ⁢a consensus to overturn Roe v. Wade in a future case.‍ It‌ is important to note that this report is based on anonymous⁤ sources and⁣ has not been officially confirmed.

If this ‌report proves to be accurate, it would ⁢signify a significant departure from the current jurisprudence on abortion rights. ⁢It would open‍ the door for individual states ⁢to‍ enact restrictions or ⁢even outright​ bans on abortion,​ effectively limiting access‌ for ​women seeking this medical procedure.

The potential‍ overturning⁣ of Roe v. Wade raises concerns about the‌ erosion of women’s reproductive rights ‌and autonomy. ⁢It threatens to revert to⁤ a time⁢ when⁣ abortion ‌was illegal and unsafe, endangering ‍the⁤ lives⁣ of countless ⁤women.‍ It would also ‌disproportionately affect low-income women and those in marginalized communities who may⁤ face additional barriers to obtaining safe ​and legal abortions.

The implications of such a reversal go beyond⁤ abortion rights. Overturning Roe v. Wade would set a precedent for examining⁢ other‌ contentious issues, such as same-sex marriage and the rights ​of the LGBTQ+ community. It could embolden conservative activists‌ and lawmakers to challenge ​other landmark decisions that have ⁢expanded civil rights.

It is worth noting that public opinion on abortion has⁤ remained ⁢relatively ⁣stable over the⁤ years,⁢ with a majority of Americans supporting access⁣ to safe‍ and legal abortion. This potential reversal of Roe v. ‌Wade does not align with the‌ wishes⁢ of⁤ a significant portion of ⁤the population, who view reproductive rights as essential to women’s autonomy and‍ bodily integrity.

As⁣ this report circulates, it is ​important to remember that ⁢the Supreme Court is an independent branch of government‍ tasked ‌with upholding the ⁣Constitution. Justices, regardless of their ‍ideological leanings, are expected to interpret ⁤the law impartially and ensure justice for all. However, the​ politicization of the ⁢judicial branch has​ resulted in a‌ growing ​concern⁤ about decisions being influenced ⁤by partisan considerations.

The revelation that Republican-appointed justices on the ⁢Supreme Court may have reached ‍a consensus to overturn Roe v. Wade highlights the delicate balance between ideology and⁣ judicial​ impartiality. ⁤It forces us to reflect on⁣ the role‌ of the judiciary in our democracy and the⁢ consequences ‌of ‍decisions⁢ that can drastically impact the ⁢lives of millions.

Moving ⁤forward,​ it is crucial ​for advocates of women’s reproductive ⁣rights, ‌as ​well ‌as⁣ all those concerned with the preservation of civil liberties, to stay engaged and vocal. It ⁢is through continued activism, lobbying, and holding elected officials⁤ accountable ​that ​the rights of ⁣individuals can be protected, ensuring a just and equitable society for all.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases