Trump seeks dismissal of Georgia RICO case based on First Amendment
Trump’s Attorney Argues First Amendment Rights in Georgia Election Subversion Case
In a bold court filing, former President Donald Trump’s attorney, Steve Sadow, contends that the case against Trump should be dismissed as it infringes on his First Amendment rights. Sadow argues that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’s indictment is an attempt to criminalize political speech and expressive conduct.
“President Trump enjoys the same robust First Amendment rights as every other American,” Sadow asserts. “The indictment directly targets core protected political speech and activity, making it categorically invalid under the First Amendment.”
Trump is one of 19 co-defendants in the case, with four already pleading guilty. Trial dates for the remaining defendants have yet to be set, but Willis aims to begin one just three months before the general election.
In a recent meeting with the judge, defense lawyers and prosecutors discussed various motions to dismiss charges or end the case entirely. Sadow emphasizes the importance of protecting freedom of speech for all American citizens and urges the judge to dismiss the “unconstitutional indictment against the President.”
Sadow’s filing highlights the lack of non-speech or non-advocacy conduct in the allegations against Trump, arguing that every charge is based on political speech and advocacy protected by the First Amendment.
How does attorney Steve Sadow argue that the charges against former President Donald Trump violate his First Amendment rights?
In a significant development in the ongoing Georgia election subversion case against former President Donald Trump, his attorney, Steve Sadow, has made a bold argument invoking the First Amendment rights. Sadow asserts that the charges against Trump should be dismissed as they violate his right to free speech. He contends that the indictment brought by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is an attempt to criminalize political speech and expressive conduct.
According to Sadow, ”President Trump enjoys the same robust First Amendment rights as every other American.” He firmly believes that the indictment directly targets protected political speech and activity, rendering it invalid under the First Amendment.
In this case, Trump is one of 19 co-defendants, with four having already pleaded guilty. While trial dates for the remaining defendants are yet to be set, Willis aims to begin the trial just three months before the general election.
During a recent meeting with the judge, defense lawyers and prosecutors discussed various motions to dismiss charges or entirely end the case. Sadow emphasizes the crucial importance of safeguarding freedom of speech for all American citizens and urges the judge to dismiss the “unconstitutional indictment against the President.”
Sadow’s filing sheds light on the absence of non-speech or non-advocacy conduct in the allegations against Trump. He argues that each charge is solely based on political speech and advocacy, which are protected by the First Amendment.
The outcome of this case will carry significant implications not only for Trump but also for the broader interpretation of the First Amendment in relation to political speech and freedom of expression. As the case progresses, it will be crucial to monitor how the court addresses the arguments put forth by Trump’s attorney and whether the protection of free speech ultimately supersedes other legal considerations.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...