Washington Examiner

Manchin criticizes Senate’s departure sans border agreement

Sen. Joe Manchin Criticizes Senate for Leaving‌ Without Border Security Deal

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) expressed his ⁣disapproval on Wednesday with the Senate deciding to “pack ‌up and ⁣head ⁢home” ​without a border security deal. Senators were forced to come to Washington, D.C., this week on their ⁤scheduled Christmas recess to close out unfinished business for the upper chamber ‌but also to⁤ give negotiators more time to reach a ​compromise on border reforms.

Negotiators continued their work on the border security deal, which is needed to pass the Senate’s defense supplemental ‌spending package, while⁣ the 60 or so members who actually‍ showed up ⁣voted ‍to confirm the‍ 11 stalled four-star generals ⁣held over from Sen. Tommy Tuberville’s (R-AL) blanket hold on military promotions. The chamber also passed a short-term extension of ‌the Federal Aviation Administration’s authority.

But members ​broke for the abbreviated week‍ on Wednesday without a handshake agreement on the border‌ deal, meaning the Senate would ​be punting ​on the issue until January.

That reality infuriated members on ‍both sides of ⁤the aisle, including ‍Manchin, who ‌described it as​ “a failure.”

“The decision to leave Washington with ⁣our work⁣ unfinished‍ is an unacceptable disservice to​ the constituents we are elected to serve,” Manchin said ⁤in a‍ statement on Wednesday. “Let ⁤me be ‍perfectly clear — we ‍should not‌ be abandoning‍ our responsibilities in favor of a ‌holiday vacation. The American people⁣ deserve ⁢better.”

Still, Manchin said he was “encouraged by the bipartisan negotiations ‌this week” and “optimistic that my colleagues⁢ on both sides of the aisle can come together and commit to passing commonsense ⁢legislation that secures our Southern Border in the new year.”

Manchin’s Republican colleagues also expressed their frustration about⁢ how the ⁤Senate operated this week, though for​ different reasons.

“We’re here this week⁣ because [Senate Minority Leader] Chuck Schumer [D-NY] had to walk⁢ his‌ members through the seven stages of‌ grief on the fact that we were not going to ⁤get a‌ border deal because actually drafting good immigration policy takes ⁢more than four days under the crush of the Christmas holiday,” Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) told the Washington Examiner on ‌Tuesday.

“There is no reason for us to be here,” ⁤he continued. ⁢“There is no reason to keep the‍ members ‌here other than to⁤ apply leverage on them over some last-minute nominations and over ‌a border deal that was never going to come together on⁢ the timeline that they promised. It’s absurd.”

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) concurred with Vance, saying it felt like senators were just “marking time.”

“There is no reason for us to be here,” Murkowski told the Washington Examiner ‍later​ Tuesday. “I am here because I was holding out some level of hope that the⁣ talks might be productive and ⁣might yield some progress. It’s clear ⁢that we’re not going to get a deal that the Senate could [immediately] take up.”

Murkowski then revealed‍ that she planned ‍to head home after the next series ⁤of ⁤votes to visit with residents affected by ⁣the recent landslide in Wrangell, Alaska.

“You⁣ weigh these things,” she explained. “I’m here; Alaskans have asked me to ⁢represent them. They want me to be here working for​ them‌ and casting ‍votes, ​but⁤ when it seems like we’re ⁣just kind of‍ processing things just to keep people busy, I think Alaskans ‍have some things back home that they ‍would like me to ⁤be‌ present for as well.”

“This ⁢could have been avoided ‍if⁢ the leader had better time management in ‌the first place,” Sen. Pete‍ Ricketts (R-NE) ‍said, referring to Schumer, who controls the​ floor. “All these things could have been done months and months ago ⁢if⁤ the leader had actually scheduled them. We could have worked.”

Not everyone in the ‍Senate was opposed to the idea of being in Washington longer, though.

“No. 1, I don’t think anybody who⁣ came back expected that we’re going to have a deal,” Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) told the Washington Examiner. “No.⁢ 2, I came ⁤back because the ‍majority leader scheduled votes, and that’s my job. Plenty of Americans are working ​this week.”

“No. 3, ‌could all of this have been⁣ done earlier? Of ⁤course.⁣ Sometimes it‍ takes the Senate⁤ weeks, months, even years to ⁣get nothing ‍done, but that’s the way it is, and it’s⁣ part of my job,” he continued.

What criticisms have been voiced by⁣ both Democrats and Republicans regarding the Senate’s decision to leave without a deal?

To fruition.”

The Senate’s failure to reach a⁣ border ⁢security deal before leaving for the holiday break has⁢ sparked criticism from both Democrats and​ Republicans. Sen.⁣ Joe Manchin, a Democrat from West Virginia, voiced his disapproval of the Senate’s decision to leave without a deal, calling it an “unacceptable disservice”‍ to the American ​people.

Manchin emphasized that elected officials should not abandon their responsibilities in favor of a holiday vacation. He ⁣expressed his hope that bipartisan negotiations can continue in ⁣the ‍new year to pass legislation that secures the⁤ Southern border.

On the other side of the aisle, ⁣Republican senators ​also expressed frustration with how the Senate operated this week. Sen. J.D. Vance of Ohio criticized Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for taking time to address his members’ disappointment over ‌the lack ⁣of a border deal, stating ⁣that drafting comprehensive immigration policy requires more than a few days during the ‍busy Christmas holiday.

Vance questioned the necessity ⁣of keeping senators in Washington, suggesting​ that it ⁤was⁣ a tactic to apply leverage on them for last-minute nominations and an elusive border deal.

While both Democrats‌ and Republicans are unhappy with the Senate’s inability‍ to reach a border security agreement before the break,⁤ the hopes for a ⁣compromise ⁢remain ​alive. Manchin expressed his optimism that ⁤lawmakers from both parties can come⁤ together in the⁢ new year to pass commonsense ⁣legislation.

The failure to reach a border deal highlights the ongoing challenges of achieving bipartisan ⁣consensus on immigration reform. The issue of border security and comprehensive immigration ⁤policies ‍will undoubtedly ​continue to be a source of contention in the coming months. As negotiations continue, the American ‍people expect their elected officials to prioritize their responsibilities and work towards finding a‌ solution that will secure the Southern border.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker