GOP officials consider removing Biden from state ballots due to immigration crisis
Republican Leaders Suggest Removing Joe Biden from Ballots in Their States
At least two elected leaders of Republican-controlled states have proposed an audacious move: removing President Joe Biden from the ballots in their respective states. Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis raised this possibility after the Colorado Supreme Court declared former President Donald Trump ineligible to hold office. While their statements may not be entirely serious, they both argued that the reasoning used by the Colorado court could potentially be applied to Biden as well.
During an interview on Fox News, Patrick expressed his concerns about the border crisis and suggested that Biden should be taken off the ballot in Texas. He stated, “Seeing what happened in Colorado tonight, Laura, makes me think – except we believe in democracy in Texas – maybe we should take Joe Biden off the ballot in Texas for allowing eight million people to cross the border since he’s been president, disrupting our state far more than anything anyone else has done in recent history.”
Lt Gov Dan Patrick: We have a bill that will survive a Supreme Court challenge. pic.twitter.com/NzrKrozfTB
— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) December 20, 2023
DeSantis, who is running against Trump in the GOP primary for president, criticized the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision during a campaign event. He questioned the lack of a trial and the absence of a clear limiting principle in the ruling. DeSantis asked, “Could we just say that Biden can’t be on the ballot because he let in eight million illegals into the country and violated the Constitution?” He expressed confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court would ultimately overturn the Colorado court’s decision.
BREAKING: Ron DeSantis reacts to Colorado Supreme Court ruling at a campaign event this morning
“There was no trial on any of this! […] Could we just say that Biden can’t be on the ballot because he let in 8 million illegals into the country, and violated the Constitution?” pic.twitter.com/JTdWPHZvNz
— Florida’s Voice (@FLVoiceNews) December 20, 2023
The Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling, which banned Trump from the state’s ballot, cited his role in inciting the crowd that breached the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, and his violation of Section 3 of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, known as the insurrection clause.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
The court has temporarily stayed its decision until January 4, or indefinitely if there is an appeal. Trump’s campaign has vowed to challenge the ruling.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump criticized the court and the Biden administration, claiming that the ruling signaled a banana republic and amounted to election interference. He exclaimed, “A SAD DAY IN AMERICA!!!”
The Colorado Supreme Court’s decision, passed by a narrow 4-3 majority, adds to the legal obstacles faced by the former president in his quest to return to the White House.
How can concerns about the border crisis and Biden’s handling of it be effectively addressed through political discourse and legislative actions?
Ots because he is unfit to hold office? Because if that’s the case, I think there’d be a lot of states who might do that, including mine.”
While these suggestions may seem outlandish, they highlight the deep political divisions in the United States. The Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling on Trump’s eligibility has opened up a new avenue of debate and discussion among Republican leaders. By suggesting the removal of Biden from the ballots, Patrick and DeSantis are attempting to challenge the perceived double standards and inconsistencies in the judiciary’s decisions regarding presidential eligibility.
It is important to note that, legally, removing a sitting president from the ballots is an unprecedented move and would face significant constitutional challenges. The Constitution clearly outlines the eligibility requirements for a presidential candidate, and it is the responsibility of the voters, Electoral College, and other relevant institutions to determine whether the candidate fulfills these requirements. The legal process dictates that any disputes or challenges to a candidate’s eligibility be resolved through appropriate channels, such as the courts, rather than through unilateral actions taken by individual states.
Furthermore, the concerns raised by Patrick and DeSantis regarding the border crisis and Biden’s handling of it are valid and deserve attention and debate. However, removing a candidate from the ballot is not a practical or effective solution to address these concerns. Instead, these issues can be better addressed through political discourse, policy discussions, and legislative actions at both the state and national levels.
The statements made by Patrick and DeSantis also serve to highlight the polarized nature of American politics. The perception of a partisan bias in the judiciary and the discontent among Republican leaders are indicative of the broader divisions within the country. These divisions have only intensified in recent years, culminating in contentious elections and heightened political rhetoric. It is crucial for leaders across the political spectrum to find common ground and work towards fostering unity and understanding.
In conclusion, the suggestions made by Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis to remove President Joe Biden from the ballots in their respective states reflect the current political landscape in the United States. While their proposals may not be entirely serious, they bring attention to the divisions and discontent within the Republican Party and highlight the need for constructive dialogue and compromise. However, removing a candidate from the ballot is not a viable or legally sound solution, and addressing concerns through proper channels and discourse is crucial for the health and stability of the democratic process.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...