Judge blocks California’s ban on carrying guns in public places
A Federal Judge Blocks Sweeping California Gun Ban
A federal judge has delivered a significant blow to a far-reaching California law that aimed to prohibit the carrying of guns in almost all public places, including churches and playgrounds.
U.S. District Judge Cormac Carney strongly criticized the law, stating that it violated the Second Amendment and openly defied the Supreme Court. The law would have imposed severe restrictions on carrying firearms in public, even for individuals with permits. The California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA) took legal action to block the law after it was signed by California Governor Gavin Newsom in September.
“The law was sweeping, repugnant to the Second Amendment, and openly defiant of the Supreme Court,” said Judge Carney.
Judge Carney, appointed by George W. Bush, also expressed his concerns about the law’s limitations on permitted gun owners.
“Legislation regulating concealed carry permit holders, who are the most responsible law-abiding citizens exercising their Second Amendment rights, seems an odd and misguided approach to address safety concerns,” Carney emphasized.
He further added, “The challenged provisions of SB2 unconstitutionally deprive this group of their constitutional right to carry a handgun in public for self-defense, despite their rigorous vetting and training process.”
California Governor Newsom criticized the judge’s decision, claiming that it defied “common sense.”
“This ruling outrageously calls California’s data-backed gun safety efforts ‘repugnant’,” Newsom stated. “What is truly repugnant is this ruling, which allows guns to proliferate in our hospitals, libraries, and children’s playgrounds – spaces that should be safe for all.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
Chuck Michel, president of the CRPA, applauded the judge’s decision.
“California progressive politicians refuse to accept the Supreme Court’s mandate and are attempting every possible tactic to circumvent it,” Michel remarked. “The Court saw through the State’s ploy.”
Michel added, “We are all safer when law-abiding citizens can defend themselves, which also serves as a deterrent to criminals.”
The law would have prohibited carrying guns in private businesses unless explicitly allowed by posted signs. It would have also banned guns on public transportation, at public gatherings, in parking areas, parks, playgrounds, sports venues, casinos, hospitals, clinics, churches, and banks, according to the L.A. Times.
Democrat State Attorney General Rob Bonta intends to appeal the judge’s decision.
What are the next steps for the fate of Senate Bill 2644 and similar gun control measures in California
Eir Second Amendment rights, must be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling government interest,” said Judge Carney.
The law, which was known as Senate Bill 2644, would have expanded gun-free zones to include many places where guns were previously allowed. This would have included public places such as parks, playgrounds, schools, and post offices, as well as private properties such as churches and homes that are used as daycare centers. The only exceptions would have been for law enforcement personnel and individuals with permits who were attending a scheduled firearms training course or engaged in certain recreational activities.
Supporters of the law argued that it was necessary to ensure public safety and reduce gun violence; however, opponents contended that it would infringe upon the rights of law-abiding citizens and prevent them from effectively protecting themselves and their families in public spaces.
The decision to block the law was applauded by gun rights advocates, including the CRPA and other Second Amendment advocacy groups. They viewed the law as an overreach of government power and a violation of individual rights.
However, gun control proponents expressed disappointment with the ruling, arguing that it undermined efforts to curb gun violence and ensure public safety. They believed that stricter gun control laws would reduce the prevalence of firearms in public places and ultimately save lives.
This ruling follows a series of legal battles and debates over gun control measures in California and across the United States. While some states have implemented stricter gun control laws in response to mass shootings and rising gun violence, other states have focused on protecting and expanding Second Amendment rights.
The issue of gun control continues to be a contentious and polarizing topic in American society. Advocates on both sides of the debate have passionate arguments and deeply held beliefs about the role of guns in society and the balance between individual rights and public safety.
With this latest ruling, the discussion around gun control in California is far from over. The fate of Senate Bill 2644 and similar gun control measures will likely be decided in higher courts, where judges will weigh the constitutionality of the laws against their purported benefits for public safety.
Regardless of the outcome, it is clear that the issue of gun control will continue to be a source of debate and legal challenges in California and across the United States. As the nation grapples with the complex issues surrounding gun rights and public safety, it is crucial for lawmakers and citizens alike to engage in thoughtful and respectful dialogue to find solutions that balance the interests of all parties involved.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...