Kathy Hochul Criticized for Altering Local Elections in NY
Governor Kathy Hochul Faces Backlash for Signing Bill to Move Local Elections
Governor Kathy Hochul (D-NY) is facing heavy criticism after signing a bill that shifts most local elections in New York to even-numbered years, aligning them with federal elections. While Hochul argues that this change promotes a “more inclusive democracy,” critics argue that it effectively eliminates local elections and consolidates power for Democrats.
The new law modifies various town, village, county, and municipal home rule laws to move many county and town elections outside of New York City to even-numbered years.
“By signing this legislation, we are taking a significant step towards expanding access to the ballot box and promoting a more inclusive democracy,” Hochul said. “This is a meaningful first step, and I would support a constitutional amendment to align all election years, to save taxpayer dollars and avoid voter fatigue.”
Strong Opposition and Accusations of Power Grab
However, the executive director of the New York State Association of Counties, Stephen Acquario, strongly disagrees. He argues that Hochul is injecting national divisiveness into local elections and prioritizing certain issues.
“At a time when we should be keeping the divisiveness at the federal and state levels out of our local communities, this bill does the opposite, burying the local issues that impact New Yorkers’ daily lives at the back of exceedingly long ballots,” Acquario said.
New York State Senator Robert Ortt, a Republican, also criticized Hochul, suggesting that this move is a power grab by the Democrats.
“With total disregard for bipartisan opposition to this proposal, Gov Hochul signed the bill that effectively ends local elections in New York,” he posted on X. “The touted benefits are a sham concocted to hide NYDem’s goal of expanding one-party control to every level of govt.”
Outrage and Concerns Over Democratic Takeover
Representative Elise Stefanik (R-NY) echoed these sentiments, calling the law a “shameful power grab” that “nationalizes local elections.”
Upstate New York radio host and journalist Bob Lonsberry expressed his concerns, stating that the bill would obliterate news coverage of local issues and enable the Democratic takeover of local elections and offices.
“That’s how tyranny says, ‘Merry Christmas!'” he added.
Alison Esposito, a former NY lieutenant governor candidate, criticized Hochul for signing the law on a Friday evening, calling it a power grab that diminishes the importance of local governments and community issues. She emphasized the need for more local control and less Hochul control.
Related: New York Governor Kathy Hochul Signs Bill Creating Task Force To Consider Race-Based Reparations
How does Nick Langworthy argue that the bill aligning local elections with federal elections will make it more difficult for grassroots candidates to win?
Republican Committee, Nick Langworthy, accused Hochul of using the bill to consolidate power for Democrats. He argues that by aligning local elections with federal elections, voter turnout will be heavily influenced by national politics, making it more difficult for grassroots candidates to win. Furthermore, Langworthy raises concerns about the potential for local issues and needs to be overshadowed by national issues in these elections.
Langworthy isn’t alone in his opposition. Many Republicans, as well as some Democrats and independent voters, view the bill as a power grab by the Democratic Party. They argue that by consolidating local elections with federal ones, the Democratic Party will be able to mobilize their voter base more effectively and dominate local elections.
Critics Raise Concerns about Local Representation
Another major concern raised by critics of the bill is the impact it will have on local representation. Local elections are often seen as an opportunity for communities to elect officials who will advocate for their specific needs and concerns. However, by aligning these elections with federal ones, the focus of candidates and voters may shift towards national issues, neglecting the unique problems faced by local communities.
According to Assemblymember Mary Beth Walsh (R-Ballston), the bill was passed without proper public input and without consideration for the opinions of local leaders. She argues that this undermines the democratic process and diminishes the voice of local communities in determining their representation.
An Expansion of Democracy or a Diminishment of Local Control?
The debate surrounding Governor Kathy Hochul’s decision to sign the bill highlights a fundamental tension in American democracy. On one hand, aligning local elections with federal ones can have the benefit of increasing voter turnout and engaging more people in the electoral process. It could also potentially save taxpayer dollars by combining election years.
However, opponents of the bill argue that it not only consolidates power for Democrats but also diminishes local control and representation. They argue that local communities should have the ability to conduct their own elections in a way that best suits their unique needs and concerns, separate from national politics and influences.
The impact of this bill remains to be seen, but the backlash that Governor Kathy Hochul is currently facing reveals the deep divisions and ideological debates surrounding election law and governance in the United States.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...