2023 Recap: Harvard’s Lost Donors and Remaining Supporters
Controversy Surrounding Harvard University President Claudine Gay
Harvard University President Claudine Gay finds herself in hot water, with mounting evidence of serial plagiarism and accusations of anti-Semitism on campus. The response from donors to the institution has been varied and revealing.
One notable donor, billionaire Len Blavatnik, has announced that he will be pausing all contributions to Harvard due to its handling of anti-Semitism. Blavatnik’s family foundation had previously given the university a staggering $270 million.
Blavatnik’s decision reflects a larger trend, as one Wall Street executive claims that “half of Wall Street” will be halting donations to prestigious universities in protest of their response to anti-Semitism and pro-Palestinian protests.
The Wexner Foundation, chaired by family members of ex-Victoria’s Secret CEO Les Wexner, has pulled $2 million in support from Harvard, expressing shock and disgust at the university’s failure to take a clear stand against the terrorist attacks on innocent Israeli civilians.
Bill Ackman, billionaire founder of Pershing Square Capital Management, has criticized the board’s continued support of Gay, stating that it has been enormously damaging to Harvard’s reputation and has resulted in a staggering $1 billion loss in donations.
However, not all high-profile donors have publicly responded to the controversies. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, for example, previously pledged a whopping $500 million to establish an artificial intelligence lab at Harvard. Similarly, John and Laura Arnold, through their philanthropic organization Arnold Ventures, have contributed approximately $67 million to the university in the past decade.
Other notable donors include Swiss entrepreneur Ernesto Bertarelli, who announced a $75 million gift to Harvard Medical School, and Swiss billionaire Hansjorg Wyss, who gave $350 million to the university. Both foundations have remained silent on the controversies.
Michael Bloomberg’s Bloomberg Philanthropies has invested an undisclosed amount in the creation of the Bloomberg Center for Cities at Harvard. While Bloomberg has been an outspoken supporter of Israel, he has not commented on Gay’s response to anti-Semitism or the plagiarism allegations.
As the controversies surrounding Gay continue to unfold, Harvard donors’ responses, or lack thereof, speak volumes. Gay has faced scrutiny for her equivocation on anti-Semitism and the revelation of plagiarism in her academic work.
Controversy Over Anti-Semitism
Gay faced criticism when she refused to condemn the calling for mass violence and genocide against Jews during a congressional hearing. Many believe her response violated Harvard’s own code of conduct.
At today’s hearing, Harvard’s President shamefully refused to say whether the calling for the mass violence and genocide of the Jewish people is considered harassment or bullying according to Harvard’s own code of conduct.
Claudine Gay should resign immediately. pic.twitter.com/gjzmTHUcec
— Rep. Elise Stefanik (@RepStefanik) December 5, 2023
Plagiarism Allegations
Conservative journalist Chris Rufo and investigative journalist Christopher Brunet reported that Gay had plagiarized portions of her Ph.D. dissertation, directly quoting other authors without proper attribution.
WINNING: According to the Harvard Crimson, Claudine Gay will “request three corrections to her 1997 Ph.D. dissertation,” vindicating my original story about her plagiarism. Gay has now asked for six total corrections related to plagiarism—a stunning admission of guilt. pic.twitter.com/uSWUh7tH9G
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) December 21, 2023
Rufo and Brunet highlighted that Gay’s use of direct quotes without proper citation goes against Harvard’s standards of academic integrity.
As the controversy unfolds, Harvard donors’ reactions, or lack thereof, shed light on the institution’s handling of these issues.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP
How has Harvard’s handling of anti-Semitism impacted the university’s relationship with its donors?
The destruction of Israel by pro-Palestinian protesters on campus. Many members of the Harvard community, including students, alumni, and faculty, expressed deep disappointment in her lack of leadership and failure to take a strong stand against anti-Semitism.
The accusations of anti-Semitism have only grown stronger with the release of several emails in which Gay made derogatory remarks about prominent Jewish figures. These emails have raised serious concerns about her ability to foster an inclusive and welcoming environment for all students and faculty.
While some donors have taken a strong stance against Harvard’s handling of anti-Semitism, others have remained silent, leaving many to question their commitment to combating discrimination and promoting diversity on campus.
Plagiarism Allegations
In addition to the accusations of anti-Semitism, Gay has also been embroiled in a plagiarism scandal. Multiple instances of her academic work containing text lifted directly from other sources without proper citation have been uncovered.
These revelations have cast a shadow over her credibility as a leader and academician. They have also raised questions about Harvard’s standards for academic integrity and whether there were any consequences for Gay’s actions.
Donors’ Response
The response from donors to the controversies surrounding Gay has been mixed. Some have withdrawn their support from Harvard, citing the university’s failure to address anti-Semitism and hold Gay accountable for her actions.
Len Blavatnik’s decision to pause all contributions due to Harvard’s handling of anti-Semitism reflects a broader sentiment among donors. Many wealthy individuals and organizations have become increasingly concerned about the rise of anti-Semitism on college campuses and the lack of decisive action by university leaders.
On the other hand, some donors have chosen to continue their support for Harvard, either remaining silent on the controversies or expressing their confidence in the university’s ability to address the issues and move forward. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative’s massive pledge to establish an artificial intelligence lab at Harvard and the Arnold Ventures’ consistent contributions are examples of this.
Conclusion
The controversies surrounding Claudine Gay and Harvard University have garnered significant attention and sparked a heated debate among donors and the wider public. The response from donors has been varied, with some choosing to withdraw their support and others remaining silent or expressing their continued commitment to the institution.
As these controversies continue to unfold, it is clear that they have had a significant impact on Harvard’s reputation and its ability to attract and retain donors. The university must now grapple with the consequences of its handling of anti-Semitism and plagiarism allegations and take decisive action to rebuild trust and ensure a safe and inclusive environment for all members of its community.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...