Jack Smith urges court to reject Trump’s immunity defense
Special Counsel Jack Smith Urges Appeals Court to Reject Trump’s Bid to Dismiss 2020 Election Case
In a bold move, Special Counsel Jack Smith has asked a federal appeals court to deny former President Donald Trump‘s attempt to have his 2020 election case thrown out.
Smith’s team, in a filing, has strongly urged the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold a judge’s decision to reject Trump’s motions based on claims of presidential immunity and double-jeopardy grounds. The arguments before a three-judge panel are scheduled for January 9.
Trump’s assertion that he cannot be held accountable for charges related to an alleged plot to overturn the 2020 election results is described by Smith’s 82-page filing as a direct threat to the democratic and constitutional foundation of the United States.
The claim of presidential immunity and a First Amendment defense were previously dismissed by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, prompting Trump’s appeal. Although the Supreme Court rejected Smith’s request for expedited consideration, the case may eventually reach the highest court after the appeals court completes its review.
In a recent filing to the federal appeals court, Trump’s legal team argued that their client cannot face criminal prosecution for actions taken while in office unless he was impeached and convicted by the Senate, which did not happen.
Trump’s lawyers claim that the indictment is “unlawful and unconstitutional” and are calling for the reversal of the district court’s order, demanding the dismissal of Smith’s case on the grounds of double jeopardy violation.
As Trump embarks on his third campaign for the White House, he is also facing three other criminal cases, including one led by Smith regarding his handling of classified documents, as well as civil litigation. Trump vehemently denies any wrongdoing and argues that politically motivated prosecutors are conducting a “witch hunt” against him.
The trial for the 2020 election case is currently scheduled to begin on March 4, 2024, just one day before Super Tuesday. However, the ongoing legal battle over presidential immunity could potentially delay the proceedings.
Smith’s team has requested that the appeals court issue its ruling five days after it is delivered, in order to expedite any further challenges. Prosecutors have also asked that Trump be prohibited from injecting politics and presenting improper evidence in the 2020 election case.
What potential consequences could arise if Trump’s double-jeopardy defense is accepted in the case
Ump-double-jeopardy-defense-in-case-over-olympics/ ar-B198GS4?ocid=msedgntp” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>double-jeopardy defense raised by Trump, according to Smith’s filing, are not only legally baseless but also undermine the principles of accountability and justice upon which the American legal system is built.
Special Counsel Smith has been appointed by the Department of Justice to investigate the events leading up to the January 6, 2021, Capitol insurrection and to determine whether any individuals, including former President Trump, may have committed criminal acts. Smith has been given extensive powers to gather evidence, interview witnesses, and bring charges if necessary.
In his filing, Smith argues that it is crucial for the appeals court to reject Trump’s bid to dismiss the case and allow the investigation to proceed. He emphasizes that no one is above the law, even a former president, and that the public interest in upholding the rule of law and safeguarding democracy demands accountability for any wrongdoing.
Furthermore, Smith dismisses Trump’s claims of presidential immunity, referring to the Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in United States v. Nixon. In that case, the Court held that the President does not have absolute immunity from judicial process, citing the principle that no one is above the law.
Regarding Trump’s double-jeopardy defense, Special Counsel Smith argues that it is irrelevant to the case at hand. He explains that the investigation focuses on potential criminal acts committed by Trump before his presidency and unrelated to his previous impeachment proceedings. As such, the principle of double jeopardy does not apply.
Smith’s filing also highlights the potential consequences of allowing Trump’s bid to dismiss the case. If successful, it would set a dangerous precedent by allowing future presidents to evade accountability for their actions and criminal behavior. The public’s confidence in the justice system and democracy would be significantly undermined.
In conclusion, Special Counsel Jack Smith’s strong urging to the appeals court to reject Trump’s bid to dismiss the 2020 election case is driven by a commitment to uphold the rule of law, accountability, and the democratic values upon which the United States is founded. The case presents a critical opportunity to demonstrate that no one, regardless of their position or power, is immune to the consequences of their actions. The appeals court’s decision will have far-reaching implications for the future of American democracy and the preservation of justice.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...