US strike kills pro-Iran militia commander in Baghdad HQ
The US Military Strikes Iraqi Militia Leader in Baghdad
The US military has conducted a targeted strike in Baghdad against an Iraqi militia leader believed to be responsible for attacks on US forces in the country. According to a US official, the strike resulted in the death of the militia leader and another individual. The attack, carried out on a vehicle, specifically targeted a leader of Harakat Al Nujaba, an Iran-aligned Iraqi militia.
Controversy Surrounding the Strike
While the US official did not disclose the name of the targeted individual, Iraqi police and security sources reported that the drone strike killed four members of Al Nujaba and injured six others. Iraqi authorities have attributed the attack to a US-led international coalition. Witnesses and police sources confirmed that the drone fired multiple rockets at a building used by Al Nujaba in eastern Baghdad.
Footage shows the moment of the airstrike that killed 2 commanders in the PMF in Baghdad. #Iraq pic.twitter.com/a7L24rJpUF
— Tammuz Intel (@Tammuz_Intel) January 4, 2024
In response to the attack, Iraqi armed forces issued a statement holding the international coalition forces accountable for the “unjustified attack” on an Iraqi security entity. The statement emphasized that the targeted militia group operates with the authorization of Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani.
Escalating Tensions and Threats of Retaliation
The United States currently has 900 troops deployed in Syria and 2,500 in Iraq to prevent the resurgence of Islamic State militants. However, Al Sudani’s control over certain Iran-backed factions is limited, as these factions played a crucial role in his rise to power and now form a powerful bloc in his governing coalition.
Local sources have confirmed that the strike resulted in the death of a local group commander and one of his aides. Pro-militia websites have published footage showing a destroyed vehicle engulfed in flames, although its authenticity remains unverified by Reuters.
As investigations into the strike continue, Iraqi security sources have yet to provide further details regarding the responsible party. Meanwhile, Iraqi militia commanders have accused the United States of carrying out the attack and have issued threats of retaliation.
Abu Aqeel Al Moussawi, a local Iraqi militia commander, stated, “We will retaliate and make the Americans regret carrying out this aggression.” At present, there has been no immediate comment from Washington.
Previous Attacks and Ongoing Tensions
Since the start of the Israel-Hamas war in October, the US military has faced over 100 attacks in Iraq and Syria. These attacks typically involve a combination of rockets and one-way attack drones. Iran-aligned groups in Iraq and Syria hold the United States partially responsible for supporting Israel’s campaign in Gaza.
Last month, the United States responded to a drone attack by Iran-aligned militants, which critically injured one US service member and wounded two others, with retaliatory airstrikes in Iraq.
What was the main reason for Operation Iraqi Freedom?
OIF was authorized when Iraq was found to be in breach of UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1441, which “prohibits stockpiling and importing weapons of mass destruction (WMDs).” Iraqi forces were overwhelmed quickly and Baghdad fell a mere five weeks after the invasion began. Responsible for the strike and condemning the “violation of Iraqi sovereignty and aggression on its armed forces.” They also called on the government to review its agreement with the coalition. The Iraqi government expressed concern over the strike and its potential impact on stability in the country, urging all parties to exercise restraint and seek diplomatic solutions to disputes.
The US military, on the other hand, defended its actions, stating that the strike was a defensive response to recent attacks on American forces. The US has blamed Iranian-backed militias for these attacks and has insisted on the need to protect its personnel and interests in Iraq. The Pentagon justified the strike, stating that it was necessary to deter future attacks and to send a clear message to those responsible.
Regional and international reactions to the strike have been mixed. Iran, a major backer of the Iraqi militia, condemned the attack and called for retaliation. Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, warned that the US would face ”harsh revenge.” Other countries in the region, such as Saudi Arabia and Israel, expressed support for the US action, highlighting the need to confront Iranian influence in the region.
These developments have raised concerns about a potential escalation of tensions between the US and Iran, as well as the impact on the wider geopolitical landscape in the Middle East. The situation in Iraq, already strained due to ongoing political and security challenges, is likely to be further complicated by this incident. It remains to be seen how the Iraqi government, as well as other regional and international actors, will navigate these complexities and work towards de-escalation.
Implications for US-Iraq Relations
The strike on the Iraqi militia leader has the potential to strain the already fragile relationship between the US and Iraq. The Iraqi government has been under pressure from various factions within the country to distance itself from the US, due to concerns over its influence and perceived violations of sovereignty. The attack could fuel anti-American sentiment and further erode public support for the presence of US forces in Iraq.
Furthermore, the strike comes at a time when Iraq is grappling with a multitude of challenges, including political instability, economic hardship, and the ongoing threat posed by ISIS. The government’s ability to effectively address these issues may be hampered if it becomes entangled in escalating tensions between the US and Iran.
The Way Forward
In order to prevent further escalation and protect the stability of Iraq, it is imperative for all parties involved to exercise restraint and prioritize dialogue over military action. The Iraqi government should engage in diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions and maintain its independence and sovereignty. The US should also carefully consider the potential consequences of its actions and work towards constructive engagement with Iraq and other regional actors.
The international community, particularly countries with influence in the region, should play a proactive role in facilitating diplomatic negotiations and promoting stability in Iraq. It is crucial to address the root causes of the tensions between the US and Iran, as well as the underlying issues that have fueled the current crisis in Iraq.
In conclusion, the US military strike on an Iraqi militia leader in Baghdad has ignited controversy and raised concerns about further escalation of tensions between the US and Iran. The incident has significant implications for US-Iraq relations and the stability of Iraq as a whole. It is crucial for all parties involved to prioritize diplomatic solutions and work towards de-escalation in order to prevent further destabilization in the region.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...