Sen. Marshall opposes HHS rule imposing ‘extreme gender ideology’ on foster parents

Republican Senators Fight Against Proposed Rule Threatening Foster Parents’ Religious Liberty

Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS) is sounding the alarm on a concerning rule‍ proposed by‍ the Department of Health and Human Services.‍ This rule has ​the potential to impose gender‌ ideology on foster parents and infringe upon their religious⁢ freedom.

Led by Senator ‍Marshall, a group of Republican senators penned ‍a letter to HHS ​Secretary Xavier ⁢Becerra expressing their concerns about the proposed placement rule. This rule would require ‍foster parents to ‌affirm a child’s ‌gender identity, pronouns, and provide specific‍ services to support their well-being.

Senator Marshall stated, “Foster care providers should ⁢prioritize finding safe and loving homes for vulnerable children. Unfortunately, the Biden Administration’s relentless pursuit of their LGBTQ+ agenda is attacking moral‌ and religious values.⁣ We will not stand by as faith-based foster care providers are excluded from helping children in ​need.”

Joining Senator Marshall in this fight are Senators Tom Cotton (R-AR), Markwayne Mullin (R-OK), Mike Lee (R-UT), ​Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS), and John ⁣Barrasso (R-WY). They signed the letter, ‍obtained by The Daily Wire, urging HHS to rescind the rule. The ‍senators argue that the proposal would label foster parents who wish⁣ to shield‍ children from‌ gender ideology as guilty of “child abuse.”

The letter highlights the premise of the proposed rule,‌ stating that foster⁣ care providers who do⁣ not affirm a child’s sexual orientation or gender different from their biological ⁤sex would be ‍accused of child abuse. The senators emphasize that while ⁢all children deserve safe placements, this rule goes beyond statutory requirements and imposes extreme gender ⁤ideology on states’ placement decisions.

Furthermore, the senators express concerns ‍about the rule’s impact on​ states that collaborate with faith-based ‌foster care organizations.‌ If these organizations do⁣ not comply with the proposed placement rule for LGBT-identifying children, they may be barred from providing homes for children altogether.

CLICK HERE TO‌ GET⁣ THE⁢ DAILYWIRE+ APP

The senators also raise concerns about the rule’s potential conflict with states that have‍ banned transgender procedures on children.‍ They​ argue that these procedures can cause irreversible harm to⁢ children who lack proper guidance and physiological ⁣development to make‍ informed decisions. States should not face penalties‌ for protecting the well-being of their children.

In addition to the senators’ efforts, over⁢ a dozen Republican attorneys general have ​expressed their opposition to the proposed rule in letters to HHS. Tennessee Attorney⁣ General Jonathan Skrmetti even hinted at the possibility of legal action against the administration if the rule is implemented.

What does the proposed rule mean for foster parents who hold religious beliefs that are‌ discriminatory?

Ter parents who ⁣hold religious beliefs as discriminatory and potentially exclude them from providing care to foster children.

The letter emphasizes the importance of protecting the religious liberty of foster parents and ensuring that they are not forced⁤ to compromise their beliefs. It states, “Foster care agencies‍ have long relied⁤ on religiously-affiliated providers to recruit and support foster families. These providers have a sincere and deeply held belief that children flourish best in families with a married mother and father who adhere to religious principles.”

The senators argue that the​ proposed rule undermines the ability of faith-based organizations to continue their crucial work in foster care. They express concern that the rule could result in faith-based providers being forced to either violate their religious convictions or cease providing foster care services altogether.

Additionally, the letter highlights the potential harm that could be caused to children in foster care if religious foster parents ​are excluded from the system. It ​states, “By excluding faith-based organizations from‌ foster care, we limit the number of available foster homes. This, in turn, leads to longer wait times for children to find a suitable placement, increases the likelihood of multiple moves, and perpetuates the cycle ​of instability and trauma.”

The Republican senators are calling on HHS to reconsider the proposed‍ rule and to instead prioritize⁣ the well-being of foster children by allowing faith-based foster care providers to continue⁤ operating in accordance with their⁤ religious beliefs. They argue that these providers have proven track records of success in caring for vulnerable children and should not be excluded based on their religious convictions.

This ‌battle‍ over the proposed rule highlights the ongoing conflicts between religious liberty and LGBTQ+ rights. It brings into​ focus the importance of finding a balance that respects ⁢both⁤ religious beliefs and the rights of the LGBTQ+ community. It is a complex‍ issue that requires careful consideration and⁢ careful crafting of policies that protect the rights and interests of all parties involved.

As​ the fight continues, Republican senators are committed to defending⁢ the religious liberty of foster parents and ensuring that the well-being ‍of foster children‍ remains a top priority. They believe ‌that by allowing faith-based organizations‍ to continue their important work in providing loving and stable homes for​ vulnerable children, we can create ​a foster care system that truly‌ serves the best interests of all children.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases