US Kids Face Possible Tackle Football Ban in State Promoting Pediatric Gender Procedures
State Prioritizes Gender Procedures Over Children’s Safety
A shocking state policy is allowing pre-teens to undergo dangerous transgender chemical therapies, endure permanently disfiguring “gender affirming” surgeries, and even choose abortions without parental consent. And now, this same state is claiming to “safeguard” children by considering a ban on tackle football.
Putting Children at Risk
While the state promotes irreversible pediatric gender procedures, it seems to overlook the potential dangers of tackle football. This contradictory stance raises concerns about misplaced priorities and the well-being of our children.
Read more about this alarming situation in the full article on The Western Journal website.
How can a state prioritize gender procedures for pre-teens while disregarding the potential dangers and long-term consequences?
State Prioritizes Gender Procedures Over Children’s Safety
A shocking state policy is allowing pre-teens to undergo dangerous transgender chemical therapies, endure permanently disfiguring “gender affirming” surgeries, and even choose abortions without parental consent. And now, this same state is claiming to “safeguard” children by considering a ban on tackle football.
Putting Children at Risk
While the state promotes irreversible pediatric gender procedures, it seems to overlook the potential dangers of tackle football. This contradictory stance raises concerns about misplaced priorities and the well-being of our children.
In recent years, there has been a growing acceptance and promotion of pediatric gender procedures in certain states. This includes hormone therapies and surgeries that alter a child’s physical appearance to match their desired gender identity. While proponents argue that these procedures result in improved mental health for transgender children, there are significant risks and drawbacks that cannot be ignored.
One primary concern is the irreversible nature of these procedures. Children who undergo hormone therapies or surgeries may face lifelong consequences from these decisions made at a young age. The long-term physical and psychological effects of these procedures have not been thoroughly studied, leaving children vulnerable to unforeseen complications and regret later in life.
Furthermore, the lack of parental consent required for these procedures is deeply troubling. Parents are entrusted with the responsibility of making decisions for their children’s well-being, especially when it comes to irreversible medical interventions. By allowing minors to make these life-altering decisions without parental involvement, the state undermines the fundamental role of parents and places children at risk.
Ironically, while the state disregards the potential dangers of pediatric gender procedures, it is considering a ban on tackle football due to safety concerns. While it is important to prioritize the safety of our children, this move seems incongruous given the state’s promotion of risky gender procedures.
Tackle football, like any contact sport, carries inherent risks of injuries such as concussions, broken bones, and other physical trauma. However, football also provides numerous benefits for children, including physical fitness, teamwork, discipline, and character development. By banning tackle football, the state would deprive children of these valuable experiences and opportunities for growth.
The state’s actions raise questions about its priorities. How can it prioritize gender procedures that carry significant risks while simultaneously claiming to protect children by banning tackle football? It is crucial to ensure that the safety and well-being of our children are at the forefront of all policy decisions.
In conclusion, the state’s prioritization of gender procedures over children’s safety is deeply concerning. The potential dangers and long-term consequences of pediatric gender procedures cannot be ignored or downplayed. Additionally, the inconsistency in the state’s approach, as it considers a ban on tackle football due to safety concerns, raises valid concerns about misplaced priorities. It is imperative that the well-being and best interests of children are prioritized in all policy decisions.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...