oann

DOJ: Ex-IRS Contractor Hired to Steal Trump’s Tax Returns


A U.S. Department of‍ Justice seal ‍is displayed on a podium. (Photo by ‍Ramin Talaie/Getty Images)

OAN’s Brooke Mallory
2:33 PM –​ Friday, January 19,‍ 2024

A former Internal Revenue Service⁤ (IRS) contractor took the position specifically to “steal and leak data” from President Donald Trump’s tax returns, according ‌to the Department of Justice ⁣(DOJ),‌ which informed⁤ a sentencing judge on Wednesday.

Advertisement

Charles Littlejohn,⁤ 38, a⁤ resident of Washington, was accused of stealing and disclosing information connected to President Trump and other affluent public figures. ‍Last year, he entered a guilty ⁤plea to one count of ⁤unauthorized disclosure of tax returns and return information.

Prosecutors presented a 15-page document⁢ advocating for⁤ the ⁤maximum five-year statutory term,‌ citing Littlejohn’s ‌breach of public trust in a crime that “merits ‍significant punishment.”

Between 2008 and 2013, ‍Littlejohn worked for Booz Allen, a consulting business that primarily handled IRS contracts ‌for public and‌ private customers. While⁣ there, he had access to “vast ​amounts ⁣of unmasked ​taxpayer data.”

Prosecutors claim ⁢that when President Trump won the ‌presidency in 2017, Littlejohn rejoined ​Booz Allen “with the intention of accessing and disclosing” the president’s tax returns, deeming him “dangerous‌ and a threat to⁣ democracy.” It‍ was not reported⁢ why he‌ previously left⁤ the company and his position of​ his own volition.

Littlejohn​ “used⁣ his access to unmasked taxpayer⁣ data as a weapon⁢ to further his own personal [and] ⁢political ‌agenda, believing that he​ was above the law,” ⁣prosecutors ​say.

His efforts to steal tax ⁢information ⁤lasted around two years while he was still employed at the company.​ Littlejohn also released a ​number⁢ of ⁤documents to liberal and left-wing news outlets in exchange for money. ‌In court⁤ filings, prosecutors did not identify⁣ the news outlets that obtained the pilfered​ tax returns; nonetheless, ProPublica and The New​ York Times has previously released a number of articles covering a Trump tax data leak.

The private tax returns of billionaires such as Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Michael Bloomberg, Warren Buffett, Peter Thiel, and others were made public by ProPublica in June 2021.

“A free press and⁤ public engagement⁢ with the media are critical to any healthy democracy, but stealing and leaking private, personal tax information strips individuals of the legal protection ‌of their most sensitive data,” ⁢prosecutors said in the filing.

“Everyone is ​entitled to ⁢equal protection under⁤ the law,” they continued.

In its‌ case for the maximum penalty, the prosecution contended that Littlejohn ⁢caused serious injury, including​ invasion of​ privacy‌ and psychological anguish, ‌by leaking the⁢ tax returns of more than a thousand people.

The allegation maintains ⁢that the criminal activity ​of⁢ Littlejohn ⁤ “has undermined public faith​ and confidence ⁤in​ the ‌IRS,⁤ an ‌institution that is critical ⁤to the effective functioning of our government.”

According to the complaint, by the end of the year, ⁢Littlejohn had created “a sophisticated, detailed⁣ plan” to covertly ⁣obtain President Trump’s ⁣tax returns⁣ from ⁤a specific ⁣internal IRS database. He had gained access to⁤ unmasked ⁤taxpayer data in February of that year.

Littlejohn also⁤ used “more generalized‌ parameters” to‌ look for the president’s​ private information while still gathering information on his ​tax returns in order to avoid drawing⁢ attention ‌to himself.

Littlejohn uploaded⁤ the ⁢stolen information to a secret website that he​ controlled, taking advantage of a ‍flaw in ⁣IRS processes to extract⁤ the material covertly. He then downloaded the contents‌ onto a ‌personal⁤ computer and copied them ‍to an Apple​ iPad ⁢that he set up⁤ to function as⁤ a personal hard drive.

Additionally, it states that Littlejohn‍ destroyed ​and‍ altered records of ⁣his disclosures ​in order ‍to hinder the inquiry into his⁣ actions.

How officials were able to identify ‌Littlejohn’s⁣ illicit actions is not fully clear.

A Booz Allen company spokesperson made a statement regarding the recent charges.

“We condemn in ⁢the strongest possible terms the actions of this⁢ individual, who was active with the company years ago. We have zero tolerance for violations of the ‌law and operate ⁣under the highest ethical and professional guidelines. We fully supported the U.S.‌ government in its investigation into this matter,” the spokesperson said.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your ​inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

Share this post!

Despite heavy ⁤snow fall many Pro-Life‌ Americans ⁢gather​ in ‍Washington D.C. to March For ⁣Life.⁤

A Texas bus company files a⁣ lawsuit ​against the City ‍of Chicago over a new migrant drop-off ordinance.

The DOJ​ releases its report ​on⁢ the ​police response to Uvalde shooting.

with Hogan Gidley

Binance is due to square off against the ⁢SEC next week in​ another high-profile⁤ hearing involving a crypto exchange that ⁣could define how cryptocurrencies are regulated.

Executives‍ at the WEF say they are grappling with how to turn early demos⁣ into money-makers.

Apple ended Samsung‍ Electronics’⁣ 12-year⁤ run as the largest seller of smartphones in the world.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk said he⁢ would be uncomfortable growing the automaker to be a⁢ leader in AI and robotics without having at ⁣least 25% voting control of⁣ the company.

rnrn

How did Charles Littlejohn gain access to President⁣ Trump’s tax returns while working for Booz Allen?

​ The former Internal Revenue Service (IRS) ‍contractor, Charles Littlejohn, was recently accused of stealing and⁤ leaking data from President⁣ Donald Trump’s⁢ tax returns,⁢ according to the Department of Justice (DOJ). Littlejohn, who pleaded guilty to one⁢ count of unauthorized disclosure of⁢ tax returns and return ‍information, ⁤is facing a maximum five-year statutory term in prison for ​his actions.

During his time working for​ Booz Allen, a consulting business that ‌handled IRS contracts, Littlejohn had access to vast⁢ amounts of taxpayer data. Prosecutors claim that he rejoined‍ the company after President Trump’s election with the intention of accessing and disclosing the president’s tax returns.‌ He allegedly used ⁢his access to unmasked taxpayer data to further his own personal and political agenda.

Littlejohn’s ⁣efforts to steal tax information lasted for approximately two years while he ⁣was still employed at the company. He also released ⁤the stolen documents to liberal and left-wing news ‌outlets‌ in⁤ exchange for money. While ⁤the specific ​news outlets were not identified in court filings,‌ outlets such as ProPublica and The New York Times have previously ​covered similar leaks of Trump’s tax‍ data.

The leaking ‍of private tax returns undermines‌ the legal protection of⁣ individuals’ sensitive data and strips them⁣ of their ‍privacy rights. Prosecutors argued that⁤ Littlejohn’s actions caused serious⁤ injury, including invasion ‍of ⁣privacy and psychological anguish, to ⁣over a thousand people whose tax returns were leaked. They also stated that these actions have undermined​ public faith and confidence in the IRS, which is critical to the effective functioning‌ of‌ the government.

The complaint against Littlejohn ​detailed a ⁤sophisticated plan ⁣he⁢ had developed ⁣to covertly obtain President Trump’s tax returns.⁢ He gained ‌access to unmasked taxpayer data in February of ⁣the relevant year and used both specific and generalized parameters to search ‌for the ⁣president’s‌ private information. Littlejohn uploaded the stolen information onto a secret ⁤website that he controlled, taking advantage of ‍a flaw in IRS processes to extract the⁢ material. ‌He then downloaded⁤ the contents onto a personal ​computer and ‍an Apple iPad that he set ‍up as a personal hard drive. Additionally,‌ he destroyed and altered‌ records of his disclosures ⁤to‍ hinder the investigation into his‌ actions.

It is not clear how officials were able to identify Littlejohn’s illicit ⁣actions. However, the DOJ’s case against him highlights the importance of⁢ protecting sensitive data and maintaining public faith in​ government institutions. The prosecution is pushing for the maximum penalty for Littlejohn, emphasizing ⁣the seriousness of his crime and its ⁣impact on individuals and the government as a whole.

In response to the charges against Littlejohn, a spokesperson for‍ Booz Allen condemned ⁣his actions, stating that the company strongly condemns such behavior. ⁢This case serves as a reminder of the responsibility individuals‍ and organizations have in safeguarding⁢ confidential information and the consequences that can result from its ‌mishandling.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker