Government’s foreign ownership tracking of farmland found to have significant flaws
Government Accountability Office Report Reveals Major Flaws in Tracking Foreign Land Purchases
A recent report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has uncovered significant deficiencies in the government’s monitoring of foreign land acquisitions, leaving the United States vulnerable to national security risks.
The report, requested by the House Oversight and Accountability Committee and the House Committee on Agriculture, highlights that the Department of Agriculture fails to provide timely data on foreign investments in agricultural land. Moreover, the existing processes for sharing this data are convoluted and difficult to comprehend.
Lawmakers have expressed concerns about Chinese ownership of American farmland, particularly when it is in close proximity to U.S. military installations.
According to USDA estimates, foreign investment in American land surged to approximately 40 million acres in 2021. The GAO warns that such investments could have implications for U.S. national security, especially if foreign entities acquire agricultural land near sensitive military bases.
To address these concerns, various states have initiated efforts to prevent foreign ownership of land near military bases, while calls for action at the federal level are also growing.
In response to the report, Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) and Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn Thompson (R-PA) stated, “Growing foreign ownership of U.S. farmland, particularly by China, poses a direct threat to our food security and national security. Safeguarding our farmland and food supply requires a whole-of-government approach, and we will continue to work with the impacted agencies, related committees, and leadership to continue our robust oversight and to identify legislative vehicles to address the findings of the GAO report.”
The report identifies flaws in the USDA’s processes for collecting, tracking, and reporting key information. Defense Department officials have also emphasized the need for more up-to-date and specific information, which should be provided more frequently than once a year.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
The report offers several recommendations for the USDA to enhance its reporting system, including the establishment of a more timely process for reporting foreign investments and the updating of data reporting forms.
In response to the report’s release, Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-WA) expressed, “This report confirms one of our worst fears: that not only is the USDA unable to answer the question of who owns what land and where, but that there is no plan by the department to internally reverse this dangerous flaw that affects our supply chain and economy. Food security is national security, and we cannot allow foreign adversaries to influence our food supply while we stick our heads in the sand.”
Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) urged Congress to pass legislation he proposed, which would prohibit Chinese Communist Party members or entities from purchasing American land.
What are the main challenges in tracking foreign land purchases and ensuring transparency?
Y and implement necessary reforms.”
The GAO report calls for improved coordination among federal agencies and increased transparency in tracking foreign land purchases. It emphasizes the need for the Department of Agriculture to collect accurate and timely data on foreign investments in agricultural land and to make this information readily available to relevant stakeholders, including Congress and the public.
One of the key findings of the report is the lack of a standardized definition of “foreign ownership” across federal agencies. This inconsistency hampers the government’s ability to effectively monitor and regulate foreign land acquisitions. The GAO recommends that the Department of Agriculture, in collaboration with other relevant agencies, establish a clear and uniform definition of foreign ownership to ensure accurate reporting and better assessment of the national security risks involved.
The report also highlights the need for enhanced oversight of transactions involving foreign entities purchasing agricultural land near sensitive military installations. It suggests that the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) play a more active role in reviewing such transactions to evaluate potential risks to national security. Currently, CFIUS primarily focuses on mergers and acquisitions involving U.S. companies, but the GAO argues that its mandate should be expanded to cover foreign land acquisitions that could impact military readiness and operations.
The report’s findings have sparked bipartisan concerns about the implications of foreign ownership of American farmland. Both Republicans and Democrats have called for greater oversight and stricter regulations to safeguard national security and food supply. Several lawmakers have expressed the need for legislation that will address the gaps highlighted in the GAO report and ensure that the government has the necessary tools and authority to identify and mitigate any potential risks.
In conclusion, the Government Accountability Office report has shed light on major flaws in the tracking of foreign land purchases, exposing the vulnerabilities in our national security framework. The lack of timely and accurate data, convoluted processes for information sharing, and inadequate oversight of transactions pose significant risks to our food security and military readiness. It is imperative for the Department of Agriculture, Congress, and other relevant agencies to take immediate action to address these deficiencies and strengthen our ability to monitor and regulate foreign land acquisitions. A comprehensive and coordinated approach is needed to protect our national interests and ensure the long-term sustainability of our agricultural sector.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...