Florida Board prohibits use of state and federal funds for DEI initiatives
OAN’s Abril Elfi
2:56 PM – Thursday, January 25, 2024
The Florida Board of Governors Votes to Ban Funding for DEI Programs in Public Universities
The Florida Board of Governors has made a significant decision by voting to ban state and federal spending on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs in all public universities in The Sunshine State.
Following Governor Ron DeSantis’ legislation in May of 2023, which defunded these programs in all state universities and colleges, the board has now voted to have them removed entirely.
The board’s decision means that state or federal funds cannot be used by a state university to promote, support, or maintain any programs or campus activities that advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion or engage in political or social activism.
Similar bills to limit DEI programs have been proposed or passed by more than a dozen state legislatures, arguing that these offices waste money and have little impact.
In a recent agreement with GOP lawmakers, the University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents decided to reduce diversity initiatives in exchange for state funding.
Governor Kevin Stitt of Oklahoma also signed an executive order to defund DEI programs in colleges within the state.
The Florida Board of Governors defines DEI as any program, campus activity, or policy that classifies individuals based on race, color, sex, national origin, gender identity, or sexual orientation and promotes differential or preferential treatment.
The regulation also defines political or social activism as any activity organized with the purpose of effecting or preventing change to a government policy, action, or function, or any activity intended to achieve a desired result related to social issues, where the university endorses or promotes a position in communications, advertisements, programs, or campus activities.
Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts
Other News:
- President Donald Trump and his team shift focus to Nevada and South Carolina after winning the New Hampshire primary.
- Arizona Congressman and House Judiciary Committee member Andy Biggs reveals that his committee has requested additional documents and information from Fulton County D.A. Fani Willis and Attorney Nathan Wade.
- The United Auto Workers Union endorses Joe Biden for President.
- Pharmaceutical company Johnson and Johnson reaches a nearly 150-million dollar settlement with Washington state in connection with the opioid crisis.
- Tesla’s stock tumbles nearly 11% after CEO Elon Musk warns of slower sales growth despite price cuts.
- Tesla plans to start production of a new mass market electric vehicle codenamed “Redwood.”
- Legacy automakers are leveraging their Formula E electric racing teams to improve EVs in terms of range, efficiency, and affordability.
- AI startup ElevenLabs achieves unicorn status as investor interest in generative AI technology drives startup valuations higher.
In what ways does the ban on DEI program funding impact academic freedom and the exchange of ideas in public universities in Florida
Influencing public opinion or government policy on social or political issues. This includes, but is not limited to, protests, demonstrations, lobbying, and advocating for specific causes or agendas.
The decision made by the Florida Board of Governors has sparked significant debate and controversy. Supporters argue that DEI programs have become divisive and promote discriminatory practices by placing undue emphasis on certain groups based on race, gender, or other characteristics. They believe that these programs do not align with the principles of equal opportunity and meritocracy that should guide public education.
Additionally, proponents of the ban argue that DEI programs often use taxpayer dollars inefficiently, with little measurable impact on the actual goal of promoting diversity and inclusion. They claim that these funds would be better utilized in other areas of education, such as improving curriculum or hiring more faculty members.
Opponents of the ban, on the other hand, argue that it is a step backward in the pursuit of equal rights and opportunities for all individuals. They argue that DEI programs are necessary to address systemic inequalities and promote a more inclusive and equitable environment on campus. They assert that banning funding for these programs sends a message that the state does not value diversity and is not committed to creating an inclusive society.
Critics also argue that the ban infringes on academic freedom and limits the ability of universities to foster a diverse and intellectually stimulating environment. They contend that universities should be spaces for open dialogue and the exchange of ideas, including those that challenge existing power structures and promote social progress.
The Florida Board of Governors’ decision is part of a broader trend across the United States, with several other states considering or passing similar measures. While proponents argue that these efforts aim to curb wasteful spending and foster a more inclusive society, opponents see them as attacks on diversity and inclusion.
It remains to be seen how this ban will impact public universities in Florida. Critics fear that it will create an environment where marginalized groups feel excluded and that it may undermine efforts towards creating a more inclusive society. Proponents believe that it will encourage universities to focus on more pressing educational priorities and promote a more equal and merit-based system.
As the debate surrounding DEI programs in public universities continues, it is essential to consider the various perspectives and weigh the potential consequences of the Florida Board of Governors’ decision. The ongoing conversation will undoubtedly shape the future of education and the pursuit of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the United States.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...