Trump gives brief testimony in New York defamation trial
OAN’s Rayana Unutoa
5:30 PM –Thursday, January 25, 2024
Donald Trump briefly took to the stand in the defamation damages case between writer E. Jean Carroll and himself.
The jury returned to the New York court on Thursday. In front of the jurors, the 45th president testified for about five minutes in his defense.
Carroll is seeking $10 million in damages, claiming that Trump destroyed her reputation.
However, she conceded she was being attacked online before Trump’s denial.
The former president stuck by his prior denial of never having met Carroll and told the court he never instructed anyone to hurt her.
“No, I just wanted to defend myself, my family and frankly, the presidency,” Trump said.
Additionally, Trump’s attorney Alina Habba asked her client if he stands by his testimony in his deposition.
“100% yes,” Trump replied.
Trump’s defense rested its case after his quick testimony.
Closing arguments are set to take place on Friday.
The 45th president has already been ordered to pay Carroll $5 million dollars.
Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts
GOP Governors stand with Governor Abbott against the Biden Administration, Peter Navarro is sentenced, and allegations are leveled against Vince McMahon.
Donald Trump has declared that he has already won Nevada in the Republican Primary process.
President Donald Trump and his team have turned their eyes towards Nevada and South Carolina after winning the New Hampshire primary.
Arizona Congressman and House Judiciary Committee member Andy Biggs says that his committee has asked for additional documents and information from Fulton County D.A. Fani Willis and Attorney Nathan Wade.
Microsoft will let go of 1,900 employees at Activision Blizzard and Xbox this week.
Tesla tumbled nearly 11% on Thursday after CEO Elon Musk warned sales growth would slow this year despite price cuts.
Tesla has told suppliers it wants to start production of a new mass market electric vehicle codenamed “Redwood.”
Legacy automakers are leaning on their Formula E electric racing teams to build better EVs with greater range and efficiency, or a lower price tag.
rnrn
What are the implications of this trial’s verdict in terms of financial compensation for both parties, as well as its potential impact on future defamation cases involving public figures
Raying by her previous victory, Carroll is now seeking an additional $10 million in damages. She claims that Trump’s public comments have not only damaged her reputation but also caused emotional distress and economic loss.
During his brief time on the stand, Trump adamantly denied ever meeting Carroll and stated that he had never instructed anyone to harm her. He emphasized that his intention was to defend himself, his family, and the presidency.
Trump’s attorney, Alina Habba, also sought clarification from her client regarding his previous deposition testimony, to which Trump affirmed his stance with a resounding ”100% yes.”
With Trump’s testimony concluded, his defense team rested their case. Closing arguments are scheduled to take place on Friday, allowing both sides to deliver their final arguments and persuade the jury.
It is worth noting that Carroll has already been awarded $5 million in damages from a previous lawsuit. The outcome of this trial will determine whether she will receive any additional compensation.
This high-profile case has attracted significant media attention, as it involves a clash between a well-known writer and a former president. It raises important questions about the extent of freedom of speech and the responsibility of public figures for their words.
The verdict in this case will not only determine the financial implications for both parties involved but also set a precedent for future defamation cases. It will shed light on the legal boundaries of public figures’ statements and their potential consequences.
As the trial continues, the eyes of the nation remain fixed on the outcome. The impact of this case extends beyond the individuals involved, as it resonates with broader concerns about accountability, transparency, and the balance between individual rights and the public interest.
Regardless of the verdict, this trial serves as a reminder of the power and consequences of words spoken by those in positions of influence. It reinforces the need for responsible communication, especially in the age of social media where messages can reach millions in an instant.
In the end, the judgment rendered by the jury will shape the narrative of this story and perhaps contribute to shaping the future legal landscape surrounding defamation cases involving public figures.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...