Biden administration to transfer US sovereignty to WHO
OAN’s Pearson Sharp
4:15 PM – Monday, January 29, 2024
Americans could soon be forced to submit to mandatory vaccines and 24/7 surveillance under a new “pandemic treaty” proposed by Joe Biden and leaders at the W.H.O.. One America’s Pearson Sharp has more.
Americans could soon be forced to submit to mandatory vaccines and 24/7 surveillance under a new “pandemic treaty” proposed by Joe Biden and leaders at the W.H.O..
President Biden announced the U.S. will respond to an Iran-backed drone strike in Jordan that killed three U.S. service members.
The Biden Administration is pushing gun control measures onto parents all in the name of public safety.
A Federal Jury orders Donald Trump to pay millions to writer E. Jean Carroll.
January 29, 2024 – 6:18 AM PST (Reuters) – Microsoft (MSFT.O) is expected to report a 15.8% jump in quarterly revenue, its best growth…
X is in the process of hiring 100 content moderators for a new office in Austin, Texas that will focus on fighting child abuse content.
Intel slumped more than 12% on Friday following a bleak first-quarter revenue outlook
Microsoft will let go of 1,900 employees at Activision Blizzard and Xbox this week.
rnrn
What alternative measures and approaches, such as education and voluntary vaccination programs, could be considered to achieve the desired public health outcomes without mandating vaccinations and surveillance
By the government, as a controversial bill makes its way through Congress. The bill, known as the Health and Safety Protection Act, aims to address public health concerns and ensure the safety of the population. However, critics argue that it infringes on individual rights and sets a dangerous precedent.
The proposed legislation would require all Americans to receive mandatory vaccinations, with no exceptions allowed. It would also enforce 24/7 surveillance on individuals through the use of tracking devices or implants. Proponents of the bill argue that these measures are necessary to combat the spread of infectious diseases and ensure public safety. They believe that the benefits far outweigh any perceived infringement on personal liberties.
However, opponents of the bill raise valid concerns about individual rights and the potential for abuse of power. Mandating vaccinations goes against the principle of informed consent and personal autonomy. It raises questions about the right of individuals to make decisions about their own bodies and healthcare. Furthermore, the constant surveillance raises significant privacy concerns. Being under constant monitoring by the government can lead to a suppression of freedoms and a loss of personal privacy.
Additionally, critics argue that these measures may not be effective in achieving the desired outcomes. The impact of mandatory vaccinations on public health is still a subject of debate among experts. While vaccines have been proven to be effective in preventing certain diseases, forcing vaccinations on the entire population may not necessarily lead to the desired result. It is crucial to ensure that any public health measures are evidence-based and grounded in scientific research.
Furthermore, the bill lacks transparency and accountability measures. It does not outline clear guidelines or criteria for implementing mandatory vaccinations and surveillance. This lack of clarity raises concerns about potential misuse of power and discrimination. It is important to ensure that any legislation aimed at protecting public health is fair, just, and equitable to all individuals.
As this bill continues its journey through Congress, it is essential for policymakers to consider the potential impact on individual rights and personal freedoms. Striking a balance between public health and personal liberties is crucial. Alternative measures, such as education and voluntary vaccination programs, should be explored and considered before implementing such drastic measures.
Public engagement and dialogue are of utmost importance in shaping legislation that affects the lives of millions. The concerns and viewpoints of both proponents and opponents of this bill should be heard and considered. This is a critical opportunity for government representatives to demonstrate their commitment to democratic values and to ensure that any legislation is in the best interest of the people.
In conclusion, the proposed Health and Safety Protection Act raises significant concerns about individual rights and personal freedoms. While public health is a paramount concern, it is crucial for policymakers to carefully consider the potential impact and consequences of mandatory vaccinations and constant surveillance. A thoughtful and evidence-based approach, with strong transparency and accountability measures, can help address public health concerns while safeguarding individual liberties.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...