Biden’s foreign policy is now a burden
President Biden’s Foreign Policy Experience: From Strength to Weakness
President Joe Biden’s extensive foreign policy experience, which was once seen as a political advantage, is now becoming a potential weakness as the 2024 election approaches. Former President Donald Trump has already begun to exploit this vulnerability, especially in light of concerns that the Israel-Hamas conflict could escalate further.
Biden’s foreign policy expertise, honed during his time in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was a key reason why former President Barack Obama chose him as his vice president in 2008. Biden was meant to balance Obama’s relative lack of international experience.
However, while Biden’s administration initially focused on the COVID-19 pandemic, his presidency has now become defined by his handling of China, Russia, and Iran. This has caused concern among liberal Democrats who worry about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, as well as Democratic lawmakers who question his authority to respond to Iran-sponsored attacks.
Biden’s decision to withdraw from Afghanistan against military advice has been widely criticized, with some calling it a ”low point” of his administration. Additionally, his failure to hold Iran accountable for its proxy attacks has allowed the situation to escalate, leading to the current conflict between Israel and Hamas.
Former Trump officials, such as Robert Wilkie and Richard Goldberg, have criticized Biden’s national security team and his approach to American enemies. They argue that Biden’s policy of appeasement and fear of escalation has weakened the United States’ position on the world stage.
Despite these criticisms, some experts, like Michael O’Hanlon, believe that Biden has maintained a bipartisan Middle East security posture that, while imperfect, has helped to prevent further problems. However, others, like Carrie Filipetti, argue that Biden’s foreign policy decisions have been driven more by a desire to undo Trump’s actions rather than a strategic vision for the future.
As the 2024 election looms, Biden’s supporters and critics are already debating his foreign policy record. While Trump warns of the potential for World War III under Biden’s leadership, his supporters highlight his respected and sensible approach compared to Trump’s unpredictable and divisive style.
Despite the political pressure, the White House and the Defense Department have stood by Biden, emphasizing his commitment to protecting American troops and national security interests. They dismiss any suggestion that his decisions are influenced by political calculations or the electoral calendar.
How has President Biden’s stance on trade, prioritizing domestic industries and imposing tariffs on allies, strained relationships and undermined global economic cooperation
On reestablishing relationships with traditional allies and rejoining international agreements such as the Paris Climate Accord and the World Health Organization, his handling of recent foreign policy challenges has raised concerns about his effectiveness on the global stage.
One of the most glaring examples of Biden’s foreign policy weaknesses is his response to the Israel-Hamas conflict. While Biden expressed support for Israel’s right to defend itself, his initial hesitancy to publicly call for a ceasefire and his willingness to use the United Nations as a mediator raised doubts about his leadership. This perceived indecisiveness allowed critics to paint him as weak on Israel and question his ability to navigate complex international conflicts.
Furthermore, Biden’s decision to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan without a clear plan for stability has created a power vacuum, leading to the rapid advancement of the Taliban and a deteriorating security situation. This has not only endangered the lives of Afghan citizens but also undermined the credibility of the United States. The chaotic evacuation from Kabul showcased a lack of preparedness and foresight, further weakening Biden’s image as a competent global leader.
In addition to these specific incidents, Biden’s approach to foreign policy can be characterized as overly cautious and inward-looking. He has prioritized domestic issues such as infrastructure and economic recovery, often at the expense of projecting American strength and influence abroad. This has left a void that other nations, such as China and Russia, are more than willing to fill. By neglecting to assert American leadership, Biden risks allowing these authoritarian regimes to shape the global order according to their own interests.
President Biden’s foreign policy weaknesses also extend to his stance on trade. While he has taken a tougher approach towards China, his decision to prioritize domestic industries and impose tariffs on allies such as the European Union and Canada has strained relationships and undermined global economic cooperation. This protectionist stance not only harms American businesses and consumers but also weakens the United States’ position as a global leader.
As the 2024 election approaches, it is clear that President Biden’s foreign policy experience, once touted as a strength, has become a potential weakness. His handling of the Israel-Hamas conflict and Afghanistan withdrawal, along with his cautious and inward-looking approach, risk diminishing America’s standing on the world stage. It is crucial for Biden to address these weaknesses, demonstrate strong global leadership, and reaffirm America’s commitment to its allies. Failure to do so may result in further erosion of trust and credibility, making him vulnerable to criticism and jeopardizing his chances of reelection.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...